Message from @Arch-Fiend
Discord ID: 432740707678289922
but a claim like that isn't starting a war.
ill say were consiterably mild compared to then
Even in cases where it was over land, what do they want the land for?
i mean napolian only wanted to one up alexander, and he got away with trying it twice colapsing frances economy twice
even hitler was only interested in europe because it was a matter of pride to reclaim the sutendatenland
_fucking butchered that language_
i don't really care about why someone wants land. At the end of the day, its because someone wants land.
some times its pride, sometimes its resources.
so the question is, what land does russia want and why?
it seems like they want the old USSR back
which i highly doubt would lead to a real WW3
most times its pride, its usually resources when the opposing faction is absolutely so weak they are consitered another species to the conquirer or its soviet russia
or the mongols
eh the mongols it was a matter that once the khan united the tribes the only way to keep them together was to send them to war
they seem more content to be cheeky bastards and hide behind "local" forces. If they wanted WW3, they'd have out right invaded people by now.
same thing happened with atilla
america is also one of those rare places that only wars for land and doesent care about anything else
because we are ruled by nihilistic capitalists
the good of the people is in spite of progress not the goal in the land of oppertunity
they want land so any future enemy doesn't have it
theres a reason we use a disproportionate amount of oil compared to our population
you gotta burn money to make money
or it could just be our general power usage
yes
I mean, war is pretty much a zero sum game.
Anything you gain, is a loss for someone elese.
Even resources you gain in land you already own, more resources is an advantage over ones adversary.
So I guess its kinda resonable and paranoid to think that way.
that is if you take war as only an issue,
War forces quick adaptation and evolution of combat,
WW2 was amazing for innovating technology, in fact the first electronic analog computer was a product of this
not to mention that after a war which ends in stability, the economy booms because all the old wares were destroyed, allowing a fresh new generation of equipment to be built and directly implemented
Kind of like bacteria and anti-biotics in a way,
the bacteria either adapts and becomes resistant, and this resistant strain makes the old anti-biotics useless.
Or the bacteria dies off
and if it survives, its stronger than before, because the weakness has been removed
economies don't boom in the countries devastated. Unless you are not taking the massive decline in the economies during the war.
thats why i said, in wars that end with stability, like the west in WW2
@Timcast https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/830148525853396992 i don't know if you get notifications of people @ ing you on minds, so i figure id share it here as well just to be sure. i just watched the culture war podcast, and this post of mine on minds provides some sources to stuff that went down during #gamergate, since you asked for it
so he's partying with Saddam in heaven now? if southpark is accurate
@Timcast hey i made this comment on your video today and i thought it might help to have it here too "there's something actually semi-misleading about how you've presented the result of your test here tim, while i think its a good experiment, its results arnt as clear cut and definitive as you present them considering you haven't shown the videos you claim to have had your advertisement put on for the following reason. you put on content filters, however not all category of content filters will filter out all videos if completely checked for every sub filter. only the filters under group "digital content labels" are applied to all content on the platform, those under "sensitive content" do not as some videos wont be covered under the filters of anything under "sensitive content". basically you forgot to do a control with every filter under "sensitive content" checked when you ran your ad, even then you probably didn't get your ad on every video on youtube, as such even if you did do a control, then did a "sexually suggestive" and "sensational and shocking" filter test there's no guarantee you could tell that you had more results from the latter 2 by simply looking at the numbers"
Just remembered. I gotta call Tim out on something he and others like H3H3 kinda messed up.
Alright you know the whole creepy kids show debacle from a few months ago. Well I think there was an innocent channel caught in the cross-fire.
Do you remember the channel "Hey Kids"?