it seems one of the reasons we do not have more concrete proof of the chemical attacks in syria is that investigators are not allowed to go where they want to.. all other evidence like satelite and social media pics can be potentially doctored, but there have been a lot of incedents which put the blame with the syrian government.. these still use weak evidence though

https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2018/04/12/vranckx---stoor-me-enorm-aan-de-propagandaslag-rond-syrie-op-het/

so one of the reasons people cant put forward definitive proof, is that investigators are not allowed to go where they want to go

so crappy social media posts and satelite images is all we have to go on

Maybe

the UK is a different place

He should have tried to get on the ballot

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/backpage.com-pleads-guilty-to-human-trafficking-in-texas

Attorney General Ken Paxton announced today that his office’s prosecution of Backpage.com has resulted in the company pleading guilty to human trafficking in Texas and its CEO Carl Ferrer pleading guilty to money laundering. This comes less than a week after the attorney general’s office assisted the Department of Justice with permanently shutting down the website.

Can we get some damned evidence of what happened here? :/

Why does this have to be happening in Texas? :/

lots of meheecans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a65tt9mbdsQ life comes at your fast

shold I go to the march for science

theres nothing really to report there and the only video i could do is calling out the left for claiming to be pro science but being as anti science as everyone else

If you have a better topic than that for your next video I'd say don't bother but if not you might as well.

Yeah, I'd have to agree with CreativeRealms.

Tbh that video has been done before, i wouldnt bother with it

Make a video when it changes, that would be news to me

@Timcast Do something on the Bully Hunters nonsense.

I don't understand the response the Bully Hunters thing is getting. I mean, yeah, it's silly, it's cringe, but it's been getting a pretty exaggerated reaction to it all things considered.

i was thinking about the bully hunters thing but i havent followed ti enough

oh right that one

that's a doozy

i wonder who started that mess up

If you get harrassed/talked down to during CS:GO, you can 'hire' a 'Bully Hunter' to come into your game and take them out.

I'm not sure if an exchange of money is involved or not, though.

I'm curious if such a system can be abused, or even be used in place of people who would otherwise resort to 'swatting.'

I know that seems a bit out of nowhere, but it is a curiosity. lol

What happens if the Bully Hunter fails? What happens if the Bully Hunter turns around and begins to 'bully' the person who called them? What if the other person hires a Bully Hunter in response?

what if the bully hunter ends up being bullied to the point of having him hire a bully hunter 😛

bullyhunter-ception

What if two parties hired Bully Hunters on each other? Would the two Bully Hunters have to fight to the death?

what if the bully hunter gets banned from the server

For harrassment.

posted something related in <#398973785426100234> , as I can't post images here

We need some common sense Bully Hunter control laws.

all i need to know about that bullyhunters thing is that someone posted this: https://www.youtube.com/embed/iXhQww6NYd4?start=20&autoplay=1&auto_play=true as the "theme song" for it.

And the fact that the 'demonstration' they gave involved setting it up, including a fake 'harrasser' and a fake 'victim'

i mean what are they gona do? the bully hunter joins the game and then what?

they play the game?