Message from @Cool Cat
Discord ID: 566014097787977771
And you know more about sociology than him because?
Also being against the wall is absolutely nothing to do with marxism @kotten
And fun fact, Israel is not the same country as America and likely doesn't have the same type of circular flow of immigrants because of the different geopolitical conditions
That's assuming your statistic you sent with no source and no way to back it up is true
Claiming it would not have any effect is frankly stupid.
You can be a gender professor and say there are 52 genders but that doesnt make it so in reality.
I just dont attribute his statue as being a professor as being enough as "I should shut up". Especially in such a subjective and tangiable field as sociology.
Islam bad. Change my mind
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-arrested-police-london-n991236
An AMAZING day for JUSTICE!
>risks lives of soldiers.
>risks lives of innocent Iraq/Afghan civilians
>exposes sources, methods, etc.
>doesn't show any crimes or wrong-doing.
and that's just from the Manning leaks.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3933088/Department-of-Defense-Final-Report-of-the.pdf
And no, wikileaks/Assange/Manning, etc are not whisteblowers:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R45345.pdf
```Whistleblowing is “the act of reporting waste, fraud, abuse and corruption in a lawful manner to those who can correct the wrongdoing.”```
or, https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/Whistleblower.PDF
```A whistleblower is an employee or contractor who reports to authorised individuals certain classified & unclassified matters that involve: A violation of any law, rule or regulation. Gross mismanagement. A gross waste of funds. An abuse of authority. A substantial and specific danger to public health & safety... *Making an unauthorised disclosure of classified information does not constitute whistleblowing nor is it an act of free speech.* "```
Can’t believe they finally got him
DRUMPF IS DONE FOR
NO MORE 2020 RUSSIAN LEAKS
It surprises me that you're not skeptical of a definition of whistleblowing that inherently relies on the exact same authority to determine what constitutes "legal" reporting as what might be doing the unethical thing in the first place.
Put simply, if you do not allow for the reporting and release of materials that a naturally corrupt government would consider _illegal_ to produce, you've a lot wrong with your worldview. Case in point, you could not consider North Korea unethical if it shoots people for attempting to spread news of the outside world. For in their government such activity is illegal.
If law itself is what makes a thing right, then you cannot criticize any state for any law.
So, no, this is not justice. Not unless you equally define justice, arbitrarily, as merely the enforcement of law however unethical the law is. Such a poverty of a definition that would be, I don't believe you truly believe it.
<:kek:538084230408830987>
For that matter, I don't care whose lives were "endangered" or "risked" for unethical, occasionally illegal, and downright maliciously lied about, activities in foreign countries we shouldn't have been in. I would equally have no pity for CIA agents who, giving the cartels ridiculous amounts of money to enhance instability in Mexico, would be murdered by being discovered. Why should I, under any definition, have pity for such persons?
You do list yourself as a "statist", so perhaps you do unironically believe (as statism philosophically and originally implied) that whatever a state says is "right".
Wikileaks is a scam in a way or another
Don't ask
with the execption of sanders and harris.. they are running because muh legacy
they are running against orange man so they either want to be known as the ones that defeated orange man or that they tried to defeat orange man
sawell....... buttplug (idk how to spell) why
RIP Democratic Party 1828-~~1964~~-2020
U cute
>Democratic Party collapsing
Doubt.
No doubt
It is falling
Slowly
you wouldnt think it if you have ever been to r/politics
Don’t look at reddit that much
its for the best if you want to learn anything unbias politically
that you dont look at it
I heard reddit is for toxic people
And doxers on it
ehhh