Message from @beyond_gravity
Discord ID: 580433239878139914
ohhhh
I see what youre saying
yes exactly
This whole new rule system is so vague that it can apply to anyone, especially considering that Mr. blue non stop calls us trolls for disagreeing with him, which could then be taken as acting immaturely because that dude thinks we're trolling
Id also like to talk about the Gillette ad
The one thats targeted at men
well nvm i gtg
The new Gillette ad is clearly back pedaling because of the backlash lol
>new gillette ad
wat
most recent one is 5 months ago
This one
>cant thumbs down
>cant comment
<:kek:538084230408830987>
For obvious reasons
-rolemenu c political roles
Dude use the <#508201721009537025>
@beyond_gravity Suck ass
Hello
guys?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002 i like to know your opinion about this
This led to accusations that the war game had turned from an honest, open, free playtest of U.S. war-fighting capabilities into a rigidly controlled and scripted exercise intended to end in an overwhelming U.S. victory,[2] alleging that "$250 million was wasted".[4]
GG @YourFriend, you just advanced to level 4!
Navy Captain John Carman, Joint Forces Command spokesman, said the war game had properly validated all the major concepts which were tested by Blue Force, ignoring the restrictions placed on Van Riper's Red Force that led them to succeed. Based on these findings, Carman stated that recommendations based on the war game's result on areas such as doctrine, training and procurement would be forwarded to General Richard Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.[3]
restrictions on red forces made blue team win(USA Won in that challange)otherwise red force could have won(iranian simulated force)
@Lil Fed 🍇 how am i harassing? did mr blue complain cause im talking about his huge mistake and he didn't like?
Oh man
Will Witt
i couldnt give less shit about news ads in the us
but if it affects youngsters and adults its bad
>> lower grades >> free study >> <a:ahmming:535055833864601601>
Not really
And the thing about Oxbridge is they're almost 50% private school when private school people make up 5% of the country