Though if Hillary hadn't been running and Trump *had* run as a Democrat, we probably wouldn't be seeing all of the socialist agenda right now

true, he might've rallied the Democrats into an economic party instead

then again, his platform was very anti-DNC

Stopping immigration,
Lowering taxes,
More hardballing the world

I mean, I'm no mind-reader or political expert, but I think the primary reason he didn't run as a Democrat was because Hillary was running... again

He probably saw that the Dems were going to try and get her into the Presidency through any means necessary

I mean, why else would she run again after being defeated so soundly by Barack Obama?

and with Bernie's popularity among young people as well

tbh i think his desire to change sides was a bit older than that

considering how he was one of those prominent anti-Obama birther people

I'm still of the belief that he never intended to win, but just wanted the publicity.

I beleive he didnt care about winning, until Obama mocked him

I knew trump was always a dem but sometimes you forget because trump as the prez you find it hd to believe he was a dem

New yorker dem

Funny that. DIdnt he say the dem party left him not other way round

It makes sense.

Love how he was friends with the clintons then bashed te fuck out of them when his opponent was clinto

He was friends with alot of people

And id imagine behind closed doors hed sit down with his opponents.

Thats what politics is about though ^

Alex jones and info wars banned from apple services and facebooks

Leftists everywhere: WTF i love corporations now

Who is the host of infowars.com ? The registrar? Wonder if that's next.

“ who is ‘designated survivor ‘ at inauguration?”
By CNN

This Jan 18 news segment by CNN details exactly who you would need to kill at the 2017 presidential inauguration in order to keep the Obama administration in power.

Why would they tell their audience this?🤔
https://youtu.be/qxIG4dduqy0

good question

this seems like the logic went: "the people are angry, they have made threats against him, so lets run a segment on what happens if this goes down.... also, lets get a paid promotion"

That was definitely a big part of it, but I think it also portrays a level of malice. This is how they decided to start their coverage of the Trump Administration. Obama had threats and talk of assassination, but I doubt that you would have ever seen a segment like that, even if a paid promotion was available.

i don't think there was malice there

mostly because this information is nothing new really

and it can be used by both sides

I still wouldn't risk it, assume someone does just that, CNN would definitely be held accountable to some extent.

you gonna hold that show accounable?

how about Tom Clancy? his books were so accurate that the CIA and Homeland had questioned where he got his info at times.

we gonna go after wikileaks?

tim?

where do you draw the line on reporting on publicly accessible information

the same logic is what fuels SJWs.

"you are spreading the message that trans people are mentally ill, therefore if someone kills a trans person stating it was because they are mentally ill, you are responsible"

this is how we get words == violence

i dont think so

I think there is a fine line where you get to the point where you say, here is a a plan on how to get something done by killing this specific person before a specific event

If that information incites someone to kill that person there has to be some sort of accountability