Message from @JULZIFICATOR

Discord ID: 489100151194124298


2018-09-10 22:03:06 UTC  

hmm

2018-09-10 22:03:18 UTC  

seems like CNN updated this article without telling people because the title seems slightly different

2018-09-10 22:03:38 UTC  

didn't Tim share something that tracks news edits?

2018-09-10 22:06:49 UTC  

newsdiffs

2018-09-10 22:07:09 UTC  

excellent, let me check to see if this article has been changed

2018-09-10 22:07:45 UTC  

actually, I found it on wayback machine

2018-09-10 22:08:10 UTC  

nope, it says the same thing

2018-09-10 22:08:28 UTC  

let's see if newsdiff says anything

2018-09-10 22:08:59 UTC  

no change log. huh

2018-09-10 22:09:05 UTC  

in any case

2018-09-10 22:09:32 UTC  

both my girlfriend and I agree the title is worded to make it sound like Williams was fined _because_ she lost

2018-09-10 22:10:11 UTC  

does it seem that way to you?

2018-09-10 22:32:42 UTC  

nope

2018-09-10 22:57:52 UTC  

Nah, it says she was fined for violations. It just says those violations were during the game which she lost.

2018-09-11 00:37:27 UTC  

^

2018-09-11 02:14:38 UTC  

Nah, dosent look like she was fined cause she lost

2018-09-11 11:03:35 UTC  

"Serena Williams is fined $17,000 for violations during her US Open loss"

doesn't sound like she was fined for losing. Just that she committed violations during her match that ended up being her loss.

2018-09-11 11:07:45 UTC  

there is not even a way i can rewrite that would read she was fined for losing. Unless it straight up read "She was fined 17,000 in violations for us open loss"

2018-09-11 11:09:56 UTC  

the "during" is what really makes the difference because it means the fines happened before it was a loss, therefore cannot be because she lost.

2018-09-11 15:49:23 UTC  

i mean her first violation (the coaching) did not lea dto ther loss

2018-09-11 15:49:39 UTC  

her smashing her racket did

2018-09-11 15:49:50 UTC  

and the bithcin out hte ref was teh cherry on the cake

2018-09-11 15:54:49 UTC  

either way, the fines where not because she lost and the title doesn't make it sound like that.

2018-09-11 15:58:47 UTC  

yeah she just lost as a consequence of them. well breakign the racket specifically

2018-09-11 15:59:12 UTC  

i mean its well known u get fined for those offences but yeah exactly it should be more clear

2018-09-11 17:40:48 UTC  

She most likely did those things because she was already losing badly. Same as when she threatened to force a ball down that line judge's throat 10 years ago. She was losing and got a minor penalty, so she threw a tantrum.

2018-09-11 18:09:33 UTC  

yeah bringing sexism into it jsut makes her look bad. lol had to fact check the CBC radios reporting on it for my mom cuz they left out a few important details like that her coach admitted to it to stop my mom from yelling at the radio XD

2018-09-11 22:41:36 UTC  

She never was fined for winning but let’s be honest. If you’re fined $17,000 USD after winning $1,800,000
I don’t think you’d care

2018-09-11 22:41:49 UTC  

For not winning *

2018-09-11 22:56:48 UTC  

*sigh* A friend of mine just unironically made the Jet Fuel Doesn't Melt Steel Beams argument...

2018-09-11 22:59:28 UTC  

Jet fuel does not in fact melt steel beams

2018-09-11 23:00:11 UTC  

But it does make it very soft and malleable

2018-09-11 23:00:58 UTC  

mmhmm

2018-09-11 23:01:39 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399204742846349312/489208937640624129/temperature-strength-metals.png

2018-09-11 23:01:47 UTC  

Would you look at that?

2018-09-11 23:03:42 UTC  

Yeah jet fuel just made them weak. It didn’t melt them 🤷‍♂️

2018-09-11 23:03:46 UTC  

Is this Reaaaaally gonna happen

2018-09-11 23:03:52 UTC  

Hahahaha

2018-09-11 23:03:54 UTC  

of course it would

2018-09-11 23:04:03 UTC  

That's the point.