There's also people like Tim trying to freelance it

i don't think news was ever unbias or boring. the trope of news being sensational is as old as news.

Yellow Press. Exactly.

Reminder that even in the "Free" land of 'Murica you can still be sent to jail for investigative journalism, if you investigate too deep.

Sensationalism backed by a multinational corporation pays well. Actually having integrity and a will to find out the truth, not so much.

Who got sent to jail?

Look at the Journalists that the Lefts favorite black President sent to jail

who got sent to jail tho?

ree

John Kiriakou, is the most topical one, as Styx was talking about him recently.

oh

thanks bookie

Taking bets all day.

I got 10 to 1 odds that RBG contracts pneumonia from broken ribs.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/21/africa/south-africa-ramaphosa-interview-intl/index.html

https://www.news24.com/Analysis/ramaphosas-killings-of-white-farmers-comment-what-the-president-meant-20180927

I hope youve already bought your guns walsp

He meant it as he said it, he wants to kill the evil white man because they are too sucessful

@Misomania you sir ~~ are a liar and spreader of fake news ~~. Euthanasia is illegal in denmark. I Would like for you to source this opinion you are spreading.

@tritrium you have been lied to

looks like the New York Times published a big pile of <#399204742846349312>
https://youtu.be/WGO3neRpv1o

@4AM_critter 🐉 you from denmark then?
I have no idea about denmark i only know its possible in belgium but under very strict conditions

Yep, as the Americans say. I am a sugary piece of pastry

Addendum:
It seems there was a mixup between denmark and netherlands, two tiny european countries.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_in_the_Netherlands

you mean two, don't you?

Yep just edited 😃

Danes and Dutch. The classic mixup.

was juggling another article about the suicide tourism industry actually at the same time, and others about how certain advocate's activities are promoting the allowance of it's spread and others about the expansion of those cases in existing national laws and how they seem to be gaining traction as it spreads through other nations (canada and the US as well). Just swapped two of them in that giant stack of articles I was cross referencing.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/canadian-public-opinion-of-us-hits-38-year-low-survey/ar-BBPXCpp?ocid=spartanntp
I absolutely *love* articles like this. They hit you with the results of the poll right in the headline (which too few people will read and move on without going through the article). Scroll down a ways and you find out they only polled 2,000 people to represent all of Canada (36.7 million people). The article isn't worded to inform people either, it reads as though it is attempting to convince me why the poll represents the truth (whether it does or not).

And of course more Canadians wouldn't support Trump. You guys in the U.S. have an America First president, while up here we have a Canada Last prime minister and as a result Trump can pretty much have his way with us because there's nobody to fight him on it. When Trump tries to get the best deal for the U.S. it will mean that Canada probably won't come out on top which is enough to make a lot of Canadians dislike him at least somewhat. Our media also doesn't really like him either (not quite CNN levels of partisanship, but getting there) which doesn't help Trump in Canadian public opinion. I'm actually surprised that public opinion of Trump isn't worse up here.

I bet it is lower tbh

I used to be able to convince people that it wasn't as big an issue as they thought but after we got re-shafted on nafta that stopped

We need a Canada First party

As much as I'd like an actual Canada First party, those kinds of things have a tendency to attract the wrong type of people unfortunately. I'd much prefer a Common Sense Party of Canada, comprised of center-left and center-right libertarians looking to get rid of political extremists and ideologues so we can get back to focusing on actual important and relevant issues.

by "get rid of" I mean specifically to eliminate their ideas through debate

I'm just gonna throw my weight behind Mad Max

@H E C K , I want such a party here too.

@H E C K shame that those ideas cannot be argued because of the sunk cost fallacy. Proving them wrong in their mind makes them right

just a shame that debate often causes those your debating to double down even harder in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are wrong, it's a wierd result

The people being debated may not have their opinions swayed, but the people watching the debate could be convinced. Perhaps not all, but some. Of course there are people with crazy levels of bias that they could never accept that their position is wrong (I've seen some shit like this on Dr. Phil), but they will be a minority.

On the other hand, silencing these people instead of debating them will not only confirm their beliefs to them but it will convince others that they are right. At least debate will keep the amount of political extremists to a minimum