Mimi
Discord ID: 226071525369839617
1,862 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/19
| Next
!agree
I only know one good tumblr artist who I think uses it because they post mainly nsfw stuff and other sites don't really let them do that.
am I the only one who thinks those late shows are stupid?
like for the most part, they're just, cheap and easy humor that gets old after one or two episodes.
somebody call greenpeace, that beluga whale needs to be sent home
So basically he's another dime a dozen late show host?
I actually don't trust him after the video he did with prageru on columbus day..
he called wounded knee a battle and not a massacre, stretching the truth and trying to make it seem like what happened to the native americans was just losing a war. And no, by that standard, I have people who I can be sure will say it how it is, and not stretch historical truth to fit their narratives.
a battle becomes a massacre when you slaughter the innocent, unarmed, and defenseless.
There is a fine line between directly firing upon civilians purposefully and say a stray bomb in the second world war being dropped on a house.
purposeful murdering of civilians is a massacre, by definition.
indiscriminate slaughtering, which is what wounded knee was, is, by definition, a massacre.
We use the term to coin other events which historically had less deaths than the wounded knee massacre, so yes, I would, based upon that, coin this as a massacre rather than a battle.
It's more of the fact that he bent the truth and made it seem like the only deaths were US soldiers and Native American warriors, and omitted truth to push the narrative he had in mind that really grinds my gears.
Neither side is sinless, no, but it's completely ignorant to act like we didn't completely decimate the native american people of north america.
it's pretty simple to coin something a massacre if you look at how it plays out. It's not a very broad term, it just has one simple definition.
A massacre is defined as 'the act or instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under the circumstances of atrocity or cruelty'
And yes, many wars DO have massacres in them, in which innocent people are lined up and shot, burned alive, etc.
you should check your dms, I'm not allowed to send screenshots in this server. Dictionary.com
Most definitions vary in their wording, but the concept is the same throughout
Just looking at what happened at wounded knee would technically classify this as a massacre, just as massacres happened in vietnam, and all the way back to the times of rome.
which is why I found you a more concise and appropriate term.
yet for some reason, no matter how many times I point said difference out, you refuse to even acknowledge it.
You can think that, but in reality you're very wrong. You've basically ignored me pointing out the actual definition of my terms, and continued to point the finger of 'emotional nuance'
Haunted, usually it's on civilians though, or disarmed soldiers. people who can't fight back.
He who declares himself the victor is usually the prideful, ignorant one.
Would you not agree though, that Wounded Knee was a massacre, and to undermine the gravity of what happened that day is historically faulty?
a bunch of native american women, men and children were shot down during a conflict with the US Army.
some were warriors, yes, but there were also civilians.
you kinda have to research these things. But yes, it is dubbed, by historians, as a massacre.
I find it funny how Undead Mockingbird shut down any form of constructive argument and declared victory despite his faulty claims against me.
soldiers were ordered to open fire on defenseless women and children.
estimated 300 out of 350 of the original tribe were killed.
it's likely the other fifty or so were able-bodied people who fled when they saw entire families being mown down.
ESPECIALLY in the past like in wars like Vietnam and the world wars.
yeah they fled, were hunted down, and slaughtered.
Though native american tribe structure is usually that there are multiple tribes of different types of people.... so while the tribe may have been basically killed off, they're PEOPLE probably have 3-4 other tribes.
By normal I mean do they act and think logically like a normal human being
A woman is based more upon personality, actions, and appearance in my opinion. My best friend is actually a transgender, and they're about as far from a leftist as you can possibly get.
I'm a big history buff and I hate it when people twist history to their political agenda. I thought the right would be free from that, but one of the so-called heroes of the right, steve crowder, has proven himself a liar as well.
You wanna joke at my friends expense, I'm not dealin' with that shit after being up all night.
Don't. Mock my friends. Even jokingly. It is not at all amusing to me, nor is it comedically tasteful.
I thought of all people he would be honest. but then he pairs with those scumbags PragerU?
Yeah. Also, making jokes at the expense of the friends of a stranger is not your best play.
They're likely to get more than a little annoyed, and for good reason. At least, if they have any form of decency or a sense of loyalty towards said friends.
probably. Those people at PragerU are pretty fuckin' stupid sometimes.
but it's completely outweighed by the founder pushing his religious ideology into the videos like it's fact.
so the rules about using channels is pretty much meaningless?
if you want a breakdown of cults and religious zealots behavior I have a channel for that.
I would do historically based videos if I didn't have such a shoddy, drawling voice.
and I actually had a decent mic.
people don't seem to get the 'illegal' part when dealing with immigrants.
if they came here illegally, they broke the law on purpose and, of course, will be punished for doing so.
Not to seem racist or anything, but if you came here illegally, you really don't belong here.
1,862 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/19
| Next