Message from @Bookworm
Discord ID: 520317846484549633
I
Want
To
Believe
You
But
I
Need
A
REASON
explain the point
For democracy you have to change the ideological bedrock
I’m on your fucking side, I just want to make sure you people can raise actual points when you’re in a serious discussion
@halfthink You know any philosophers that argued for democracy?
If I tried to defend monarchy, I would say that it is a better representation of societal structures and can provide superior mechanisms for selecting a superior leader.
Hobbes
The ur-social unit is the family, with the father at the helm, making decisions for the unit and directing it.
Thomas Hobbes was very much in favor of autocratic governments
As social units grow in size, there still must remain a singular unit at the head, directing it.
This force leads the individuals which comprises the unit, but does not draw authority from it, anymore than a father draws authority from his children.
Rousseau, I think, was a fan of democracy.
Kinda
on small scales
> If I must be a slave, I would rather be privately owned than publicly owned
lmao
US citizens pay tax on global income, whether connected to US or not
the only other country that taxes the slaves globally is the Philippines, iirc
there is, indeed, a case to be made that we are publicly owned slaves
Lol
Not the muh wage slave argument
in most cases, the tax liability applies only within a geographic jurisdiction
for US and PH citizens, the liability attaches to the person
yeah, that's a problem
that is not the wage slave argument at all
i wouldnt mind being a slave as long as i got food and a place to sleep its not like thats much different from what some people have nowadays
citizen = serf
No representation without taxation.
perhaps I am not familiar with the wage slave argument
what is it?
its the commie labour theory of value argument
not the libertarian tax is theft argument
oh, right - yeah, this is not the wage slave argument
and it's not really the taxation is theft argument, either
it's more a proof that we are chattel property of the state argument