The majority of whites are dead weight, and their characters has been bred to be lemmings

And the people who even listen to New Awakening should re-evaluate their stance

Their leader is a pedophile who grooms kids in Roblox

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdj5JFRm-Ok

Live

No

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Without_Nazism

@Deleted User you made me color a garrison 😉

or wyat

I mean

God jul

@Bravos what's your views on national socialism

I mean what do you see as important parts of it

alright

@Bravos are you christian?

what's your beliefs when it comes to sex before marriage and those sorts of things

why is chastity important?

what has marriage to do with sex being less degenerate?

anyway, I agree with everything else, but we don't hold Christian values.. modesty is good and sex can be a distraction but it's not something that is morally wrong

You might talk about the current stiuation but it's not relevant for the concept of national socialism

this would not apply in national socialist state

I don't fully disagree with you, but I don't think this as black or white honestly

having several sexual partners isn't bad per say

that's some christian thought

it's not something to strive for, but it's not wrong in itself, and lets not make this a circle argument.. I get what you mean with attachment

So what about single mothers?

It's acceptable in national socialism, it's not morally wrong

*"It is self-evident that the total state views marriage as the foundation of the family and engages itself with all emphasis for the protection of marriage. But it demands just as empathetically the respect for the nation's life-will and hence respect for the will for child in every congenitally healthy woman. In other words: for the nation, the congenitally healthy child of an unmarried woman is infinitely more valuable than a cretin, who has resulted from a marriage “blessed” by all churches. For the nation, an unmarried mother, who in defiance of all moral and bourgeois-social inhibitions happily affirms her child, is preferable to a married woman who intentionally excludes herself from the blessing of children or is even only without blame infertile. The total state, in its population policy as well, looks at the whole while morality sees only the portion, the exterior. Moralists see in this realisation and demand of the total state the danger of a loosening of morals, of a degeneration, perhaps even of an intentional immorality. But that they in their morality, for example downright demand abortion, they do not want to admit. But instead, they like to preach “abstinence”. They thereby place themselves under the shadow of the cross, which combats life-will itself and in its radicalism demands the dying out of the “sinful” drive for life."*
- Kurt Eggers

*"Total state demands empathetically the respect for the nation's life-will and hence respect for the will for child in every congenitally healthy woman. In other words: for the nation, the congenitally healthy child of an unmarried woman is infinitely more valuable than a cretin, who has resulted from a marriage “blessed” by all churches. For the nation, an unmarried mother, who in defiance of all moral and bourgeois-social inhibitions happily affirms her child, is preferable to a married woman who intentionally excludes herself from the blessing of children or is even only without blame infertile."*
- Kurt Eggers

having children is far more important than whether the mother raises the child alone or not

in a national socialist state, the state would help raising the child as well

Yeah, you can't have "SS" soldiers marry every woman they breed with

so the mother has to be single, but the child will be brought up by the SS together with the mother

Why?

I mean why wouldn't they do that without marriage

https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb60.htm

This is a good article by Goebbels about morals

@Bravos you need to drop your christian mindset it's not what national socialism is about

I understand where you're coming from, and your goals are righteous but it's not national socialist to think in christian morality

and I'm not sure the man "owns" the womans sexuality

I don't think that's national socialist, but yeah.. thanks for discussing with me

maybe today the culture is so degenerate that cheating on your partner might happen for anyone, but if the culture were healthier and it happens shouldn't the man be to blame since he couldn't keep his wife to himself, his character must have caused it

I don't really know if anyone is to blame, being unfaithful is wrong but anyway I don't think Christian values has anything to do with it

before christianity being faithful was still core to our culture as well as letting kids be kids

yeah, we shouldn't encourage sleeping around but it's not morally wrong neither if it's in order to find a life partner

but todays culture is degenerate, but that is due to the circumstances in finding a partner and how todays values are wrong

the jews created feminism and it's part of cultural marxism, so it's just a way to break down the natural order and stability of the society they want to reshape

the people don't always know what's best for them

or else direct democracy or something like that would be the way to go

we are open to the people making choices in some questions whether the state has to decide what's best for the people as a whole in other questions

*where as

eventually when the culture and genetics are healthy enough it will become an organic state

still hierarchical, not some socialist thing

I guess so, you can't and I don't see any benefit from micro managing people like that

we're not anti individuals or individual differences

but maybe anti individualism if you see that as a philosophy or political stance or how you would classify it

anyway you need to be able to sacrifice your own beliefs, wills and wants for the race or people as a whole to be able to cooperate effectively

you don't have to abandon them, but everyone can not pull the rope in their own direction

yeah, it's about being taught correctly mostly

Germany was never as USSR

people were happy and did these things voluntarily because they would benefit from it

I don't know, why can't they be the same

indoctrinate people with the truth

just give them healthy ideals

and it will sort itself out

they can be critical but of what?

our state isn't what MSM portrays the third reich as

instigators might not be so appreciated, but it all depends on what the motives behind it is and so on

yeah, but that wouldn't be a problem

we wouldn't allow that

you know that it's the jews that cause that

and anyone who would do that would be a traitor or enemy of the people anyway

a few of course, but they are easy to take care of

and we have more sympathy

we don't act like pests

no

the jews need to exist as part of the history books

they need to be dealt with

I will have to sleep now though

I meant they should only exist as part of a fairy tale or as something that exists only in history books but not in real life

Heil Hitler

Teach them, maybe they'll listen more to you than someone of their own. You can also contribute to us in other ways than money. You can write for Nordfront, you can discuss for our sake online. You can do journalistic research or digging or a binding stories anything that could be useful to us

If you prove your dedication you might be a part of us although not full member but it's all about trust and accepting your place within the movement

"Once you win the war"

just go home now

if you don't plan on doing something actively

although I rather see you here than some non NS shitskin

No

Your monocle SS fetishm is false

So how is calling a non-white a shitskin not NS?

or not up to your conception of NSDAP

So using epithets for you isn't NS because of that? RACE is above all else

You have the physical race, the spiritual race and character

all are intertwined yet not the same, but still connected

you shouldn't say you are a strasserist