*role nationalist

*role

Ideals that prioritize the race, the family

anything higher than that is unnatural

We aren't abstract creatures, we are of matter and our ideologies have to prioritize our nature

National Socialism is sane in its symbiosis with nature

It promotes what is strong and eradicates what is weak

@O.Staaf

I am a theist

Women's chastity needs to be preserved

The family is the priority, not an individual's right to be a degenerate.

Chastity is important moreso today than ever before

because women cannot pairbond as effectively after having multiple sexual partners

Sexual liberation of women gives women power over men, and can select men with their values

basically I have slippery slope arguments

In that environment social pressure would keep people from being promiscuous

at least openly

I'm not Christian but, as long as women are controlled it shouldn't be a problem

Single mothers . . .

They chose a bad man or they drove a good man out

assuming he didn't die

These unfortunates I would use as a warning to society

They would have to rely upon charity

If I had to choose, even the weak among my people would have to be discouraged

I would not encourage the behavior that results in single mothers by rewarding those that had a part in it

Even White people are capable of degeneracy, I believe in eugenics whole heartedly

At this point I agree with the demographics problem

but in the future, I want the best to breed the most

I don't think I'm for marriage in all cases

but marriage still has to be seen as an institution that is sacred so that men will contribute to society

for their women

and children

Marriage is an agreement so that the woman will be taken care of in her old age
It is also an agreement so that the man owns her sexuality

The husband will have monopoly over sex

her sex

I will read this

No problem

I enjoyed this discussion

Hm,

This rests on the question of a woman's autonomy

It makes sense people will search and play the market until they find someone who wants to purchase them

I think that men and women will naturally create a system that has to be mutually beneficial without the government rigging it in one gender's favor

Society at large will determine whether or not they will tolerate promiscuity

Once the government cannot bail out women that have been foolish

True

In regards to what women will want long term and men will want long term for their family lives that will have to be satisfied voluntarily between the two of them.
Crying foul after using your sexuality and asking the government to bail you out will enforce behaviors that are toxic to society.

I agree that if the state prioritizes the race above anything else then it will probably result in policies that benefit the healthy and smart, while punishing the dumb and weak

Yeah, otherwise it would be central planning to the point of mismanaging your capital - in this case your human capital.

Hm

I would probably say that individualism in a system that is run by destroyers will result in individuals benefiting themselves at the destruction of their people

Which is what we have today.

In a system that is run by protectors and sustainers, then people who wish to benefit themselves will act in a way that strengthens their people.

From everything I have observed, I know that the majority of people respond to incentives. They might feel strongly about something but are too lazy or cowardly to sacrifice for it. That's why the system has to incentivize people artificially.

Yeah, the education is compromised as well.

I don't think that people need the truth, they need to be indoctrinated.

We need loyalty.

Either way they won't be learning how to think critically

Which gives them the inability to disagree with the status quo

Whether it is the truth or not

As long as it results in action that benefits the race

and as many individuals within the race as possible

Right, I think as long as no subversion of the education system or media is allowed to happen then healthy disagreement can be had.

I'm wary of egalitarian thought.

It spreads like a disease.

I think if White people can be main proponents of egalitarianism they can still subvert.
If Jews ever were out of the picture, there would still be subversive intelligent people.

They just wouldn't be able to work in concerted effort for years because of the lack of tribal bindings and differences that can keep them polarized against the host nation.

Maybe White people are more controllable . . . They are smart, but orderly.

True

I think an interesting question is the final solution to the JQ

At this point do you really think they can be left alone?

Do you really think they can exist on the same planet as us?

@O.Staaf

I like that

They should only be remembered as monsters in fairy tales

Does anyone know a good Norwegian server for me to practice my Norwegian?

@Deleted User Because I am going to live in Norway

The United States

I have family in Norway

and I'm ethnically Norwegian

so it's where my heritage is

I want to live there for a year or two

and see how it goes