It makes sense people will search and play the market until they find someone who wants to purchase them

before christianity being faithful was still core to our culture as well as letting kids be kids

yeah, we shouldn't encourage sleeping around but it's not morally wrong neither if it's in order to find a life partner

but todays culture is degenerate, but that is due to the circumstances in finding a partner and how todays values are wrong

I think that men and women will naturally create a system that has to be mutually beneficial without the government rigging it in one gender's favor

Society at large will determine whether or not they will tolerate promiscuity

Once the government cannot bail out women that have been foolish

the jews created feminism and it's part of cultural marxism, so it's just a way to break down the natural order and stability of the society they want to reshape

True

the people don't always know what's best for them

or else direct democracy or something like that would be the way to go

we are open to the people making choices in some questions whether the state has to decide what's best for the people as a whole in other questions

*where as

eventually when the culture and genetics are healthy enough it will become an organic state

still hierarchical, not some socialist thing

In regards to what women will want long term and men will want long term for their family lives that will have to be satisfied voluntarily between the two of them.
Crying foul after using your sexuality and asking the government to bail you out will enforce behaviors that are toxic to society.

I agree that if the state prioritizes the race above anything else then it will probably result in policies that benefit the healthy and smart, while punishing the dumb and weak

I guess so, you can't and I don't see any benefit from micro managing people like that

Yeah, otherwise it would be central planning to the point of mismanaging your capital - in this case your human capital.

we're not anti individuals or individual differences

but maybe anti individualism if you see that as a philosophy or political stance or how you would classify it

Hm

I would probably say that individualism in a system that is run by destroyers will result in individuals benefiting themselves at the destruction of their people

Which is what we have today.

In a system that is run by protectors and sustainers, then people who wish to benefit themselves will act in a way that strengthens their people.

anyway you need to be able to sacrifice your own beliefs, wills and wants for the race or people as a whole to be able to cooperate effectively

you don't have to abandon them, but everyone can not pull the rope in their own direction

From everything I have observed, I know that the majority of people respond to incentives. They might feel strongly about something but are too lazy or cowardly to sacrifice for it. That's why the system has to incentivize people artificially.

yeah, it's about being taught correctly mostly

Yeah, the education is compromised as well.

Germany was never as USSR

people were happy and did these things voluntarily because they would benefit from it

I don't think that people need the truth, they need to be indoctrinated.

We need loyalty.

I don't know, why can't they be the same

indoctrinate people with the truth

Either way they won't be learning how to think critically

Which gives them the inability to disagree with the status quo

Whether it is the truth or not

As long as it results in action that benefits the race

and as many individuals within the race as possible