Nemets
Discord ID: 390359108609638401
454 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/5
| Next
40% of english ancestry comes from anglo-saxons
Ilhan Omar's district is almost 70% American
Rene Guenon basically did that
@NateDahl76 which countries?
lot of stuff to digest in this one - african genetic history has a lot unanswered questions
Hello @everyone - first discussion on Rules for Radicals will be starting at 7:00 pm EST
Called the switchboard, and they just transferred me to the comments line, which was closed.
@Mick Medieval Russia 980-1584
if it's 600+ pages and the 1 star reviews on amazon aren't about formatting errors or freudianism it's usually at least half decent @Mick
I'm enjoying it, but it is pretty academic
I'm only 7% into it so far - but a lot of it is past the arrival of ryurik
he was a viking of finnish background that united a lot of slavs and founded Rus'
his descendants would rule russia until the death of Ivan IV "The Terrible"
russians are a mixture of a lot of different peoples, just like americans
slavs are the main group, but they have a lot of finnic and ugrian ancestry, with a sprinkling of tatar and german
in a lot of ways he was
yeah
no problem
after mongols destroyed kiev and a lot of principalities, base of russian civilization shifted north of the forest line to places where nomadic hordes were less capable of attacking
moscow was a very loyal servant of the mongols, and gained a lot in power and wealth relatively during that time
by the 15th century, the mongols were destroying themselves through fighting between descendants of genghis khan and new warlords
so moscow was able to retake a lot of territory that had been lost
a lot of the various principalities had their own identities at that time, and regularly rebelled against moscow
Ivan IV is pretty famous for sacking novgorod, a major city that had its own identity, and he played an even larger role in his grandfather Ivan III in promoting russian identity in the territories he controlled
as time went on, the various principalities gradually lost their identities and became russians
however certain places like galicia and volhynia remained outside of russian control until 1945, and never adopted a russian identity, and instead kept their old identities as part of the old principalities. These identities became the modern ukrainian identity
so Ivan IV was part of a broader trend of centralization and russification that continued until 1917, but was exceptionally good at it
but he was still part of the old system in a lot of ways
hope that makes sense
I think I was searching for medieval russian history on Amazon
it was $38 for kindle edition iirc
will do
@Myndrian check out some of the papers posted in <#393251982258995201>
inclusive fitness and reciprocal altruism evolution are a lot more plausible than group selection
for Turchin, he is talking about state evolution, not genetic selection for traits
his argument is that states on "metaethnic frontiers" are able to reduce rights and privileges of groups in their state and mobilize more resources, enabling them to dominate less efficient states
I just don't get how there is selection at the group level genetically. Sure socially, culturally, and politically, but not genetically
creatures where group selection occurs are usually eusocial, like ants or bees
hamilton's rule comes into play here
not sure if everyone views their own race as most trustworthy - a lot of whites here in CA greatly prefer our mestizo, asian and subcon neighbors to conservative whites
in group racial preference is socially and culturally conditioned to a large extent
in past, religion was the largest divide, and in many parts of the world it still is
as for the ashkenazim - they are hardly unique. karelians are still clearly distinct from other finns today, but they little conception of nationhood and are being absorbed into russian and finnish populations rapidly
just doesn't seem likely that racial in group preference is a genetic trait - although in group preference in general might be
neither whites nor azhkenazim are particularly unique. Chinese of the Tang dynasty invited in hordes of iranians and turks, and provided them with plenty of opportunities which they immediately abused. Same for the Hindus with the Moslems in the subcontinent, iranians with their turkic and arab minorities, congo with its tutsis, etc. not all that different from white foolishness.
as for the ashkenazim, check out the armenians of the various caliphates, the sogdians of the tang era, the greeks of the middle ottoman period, italians of the levant during crusader times, etc
gujarati merchants and tamil brahmins are other good examples
very little outbreeding from those groups
not yet - I've been meaning to
Does it have the math showing how genes promoting group selection spread through a population?
Been a while since I read a population genetics book, but have vague memory the numbers for group selection didnโt work out
he's saying that we weren't calculating for polygenetic traits back when their theory was first proposed, and that current computer models show that their theory is plausible
that isn't true by the way - the infinitesimal model has been around for ages
as for bacteria, they are almost clones of each other
he is saying that critics were criticizing their theory by saying 1 trait = 1 gene, and that we know now that many genes affect a trait
but in the infinitesimal model it is assumed that an infinite number of alleles affect a trait
Interesting guy: US Department of State, Rockefeller Foundation, Gates Foundation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajiv_Shah
yeah - he's a gujarati bania - the transnational merchant caste
Portuguese like Albuquerque and Almeida were well aware the subversion threat that his types posed
@Wood-Ape - OK/MN "Conquerors" by Crowley is a pretty fun read on Portuguese adventures in the Indian Ocean
this medieval russia book is pretty good so far
Yes
people seriously underestimate Kamala Harris - people in the subcontinent such as Vatal Nagaraj have been trying to warn the world of her caste for decades
truly incredible how many Indian communists leaders come from her mother's very small caste
she is a tamil brahmin - definitely not a dalit
I was warning jazzhands about gujarati bania jati a few months ago - was hoping he'd share the news to his listeners
that is the transnational merchant caste based in India's northwest that is very similar to the role jews played in eastern europe for a while
jati just means subcaste
yes they are - one member of her jati was leader of the maoists in kerala (southwest india) and another was the leader of Communist Party of India for a while
no
nimrata is a punjabi sikh
Does anyone know a good book on Reindeer Herding?
@Clayton_H_ATX read "Udems" as "Udmurts" for a second
454 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/5
| Next