genetics
Discord ID: 393251982258995201
50 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
Interesting, my uncle used to love anything he could find on Neanderthals
tldr version - first race in india was distantly related to negrito races like papuans. Then sardinian-like race showed up in modern pakistan, and somewhat mixed in with the older negritos. This mixture becomes the dravidians and spreads over India. Then the aryans show up sometime after 2000 BC. Worth remembering that the aryans mixed pretty extensively in Central Asia before they invaded India though.
tldr: pygmies around the world aren't closely related, but evolved in the same way towards small size
tldr: unrepresentative study of Argentines shows them to be only about 65% white on average, with a lot of variance
the amren article goes well with the paper - lots of indian immigration in the last 90 years, but it used to white
tldr: mysterious armenian type ancestry in lipka tatars, but 70% euro and 30% asian otherwise
annoyingly, it does the admixture plot and includes the volga tatars, but doesn't discuss them
Three racial replacements in NE asia. Also, no hint of melanesian type ancestry in ancestors of Amerindians. Seems to imply melanesian first model for peopling of the americas
the ancient north siberians are also the ancestors of the ancestral north eurasians. The ancient north siberians split from west eurasians 40k years ago. So that solves the question of why some thought that western hunter gatherers appeared to form a cline with ANE
Showing differences between African and European peoples.
tldr: at least three races in americas that we don't know much about, and at least one was here prior to amerindians
Maybe Joseph Smith wasnโt 100% full of it
Haha maybe Brigham had some good stuff too
good point - mormons could use this
How long until we discover "politically incorrect truths".
can't believe I haven't posted this - about the indo-european conquest of europe
@Nemets What do you think the implications of that are?
for our people?
there aren't any - I wouldn't stop being pro white regardless of whatever came out of genetics
just interesting to know more about our history
Yeah but I meant what are the implications for genetic tendencies?
what does that say about our people?
it's just a paper about ancestry, not any tendencies
k
40% of english ancestry comes from anglo-saxons
lot of stuff to digest in this one - african genetic history has a lot unanswered questions
a third nonhuman species that was as distantly related to us as denisovans and neanderthals interbred with humans
So Africans have neither Neanderthal nor this third source introgression?
They have both from a later backmigration
Ok, answer me this. Australian aborigines are Homo Sapiens or Homo Sapiens Sapiens?
Weโll find out in the next few years
looks like some northern amazonian populations used to have a large population in the past - perhaps related to the Amazonian agriculturalists that Charles Mann talks about in 1491
paper on the how the various medieval spanish kingdoms left a genetic impact
50 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1