👑 ✝SteveBannon⚡NationalPopulis✞

Discord ID: 742882385783292047


374 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/4 | Next

@Void is he look like that one dude from the netflix series “shameless” lip

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/448280209830051840/780893777060954152/image0.gif

NYC will not win the supreme court if he doesn't show evidence which include videos and recording of an accident that occured
Because affavidat witness doesn't apply for anything. I watched Gulliani Rudy affivdatives witness, they are just statements and claims not evidence of videos or recording to show to the court

That was a partial recount, Trump has to pay for a full recount. Some courts will ignore a case and look into it later because the witnesses and affavidat might show lack of evidence

Court can order a recount and find constitutional violation of changing election laws in each state without legislature approval

That is all they can do

A criminal investigation would need some sort of recording and videos from the election workers and offical stating that they have been cheating and should be arrested

In Bush vs. Gore. The court decided to end the election after the recount was finished because of deadline regulation.

There is a certain extend that the court gets tired of listening to voter fraud when there has already been a recount

and end a election from there

If the courts block the certification by means of litigations and the governor tries to appeal it. It will end up going to the general assembly (Legislator branch). The state election and governor does not decide the electorals as stated in the 12 amendment " Article 2 section 1 Claus 2 "Each state as a legistator thereof direct a number of electors"

What do you mean by violating equal protection clause?

such as holding some ballots to a different standards?

Do you think there will be violation under the equal protection clause as Rudy stated?

Its not just faith. Its about evidence that they can prove in the judicial system

Where is the evidence?
\

I know they start counting in the day of night and they stated that they were going to be closing the election office

There is a difference between being present and observating the ballots. And so the election offical had to change the rules to prevent people from getting any closer.

The state legislature claim that they will not change the outcome of the election

The state legislature will attend Judy Guliani committe hearing

How will the Scotus going to rule this case?

Is all of the states going to the supreme court?

They are more concerned about filling a vacancy then packing the supreme court

Its about how solid and strong the case is than just how judges cast their decisions

@Thomas Marik I heard the Amy Comney didn't have the time to analyze the illegality of Mail-in ballots before the election. A Decision like consitutional violation such as absentee deadlines and Equal protection clause will be ruled?

I said that supreme court didn't have enough time to rule against mail-in ballot BEFORE the election started @Thomas Marik

The associate press, State election or governor does not determine the outcome of the election

Its never stated in the constitution

The consitution only states Article 2 section 1 Claus 2 "Each state as a legistator thereof direct a number of electors"

What happen if the State Legislature does not uphold the consitutional authority after being ruled by the supreme court such as when the state secretary of Michigan mentioned that they will not change the outcome of the election?

The Michigan recount will be extraordinary

Imagine if the State legislature claim to accept the election results because they are following the law to let the state of election to certify the results after one electoral was threatened and their kids stalked

But State of Canvass "Aninimously voted" overwhemgingly

Does the voting by mail violate the the Penn constitution

I have been trying to find the PENN consitution it doesn't say otherwise

As with prior historical attempts to illegally expand mail-in voting by statute, which have been struck down going as far back as the Military Absentee Ballot Act of 1839, Act 77 is another illegal attempt to override the limitations on absentee voting prescribed in the Pennsylvania Constitution, without first following the necessary procedure to amend the constitution to allow for the expansion.”

The state legislature wrote against this or they didn't added Mail-in-ballot? @Thomas Marik

The judge will block the certification and interpret the constitution as it is written

@Thomas Marik Will this legal case be in the same executive or judicial branch that supported the mail-in-ballot?

Just curious, are the judge bias against this

Were they elected by democrats

This legal case is in the federal judge?

The PA supreme court overrule against the federal judge to reject mail-in ballot?

and now its going to the supreme court in DC

You mean amy comey and and brett kavanaugh ?

MI should be going to the supreme court then

@HighTestLadyKiller Didn't the supreme court reject trump from going against mail-in-ballots?

Was it the 3 day extension or the allowance of mail-in-ballots?

So this is going to the Scotus right?

So there are two legal case, the extension counting and the mail-in-ballot which violate the state legislature

and the supreme court decision

Why is this not happening anywhere else including arizona, Michigan and Georgia?

What will happen with those states

Challenging the 3 day extension or mail-in-ballots?

@HighTestLadyKiller Any good news for any other states like Georgia, Arizona, and Michigan?

Any similair aspect to Penn legal case

"If the state flips back over to President Trump after a recount, the overall election result will not be impacted, as President-elect Joe Biden will still have won a majority of Electoral College votes." @RALPHY88

@RALPHY88 You mean Judy Guiliani didn't take other swing states into account?

@RALPHY88 But are they taking Legal cases on mass fraud in Georgia and Arziona?

Or is it only a recount?

Bro its not going to be a recount

its going to be getting rid of illegel ballots

and counting legal ballots

@RALPHY88 I'm just going to listen to Rudy Guiliani cases in all of these states

It will be a domino affect

is the same judge throwing out cases in Georgia will go to the supreme court @HighTestLadyKiller

He doesn't have time to go to another judge

He will have to ask the state legistrator

Judy Guiliani is going to the state legistrator he doesn't have time for the courts to reject him

There isn't much criticism in the State legistrator especially in Georgia

But in Michigan its different

I don't know whats going on with Syndey Powell

There are cases against the governor?

How does a check stub to be paid for ballot harvesting be proof of anything?

Does it has their signature in it?

Probably their routing number in it lol

There will be a criminal charges in these organization once they get the signature and check stubs

374 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/4 | Next