Wait what

Since when

Wait, no, I think I misinterpreted Trumpetition

Court can order a recount and find constitutional violation of changing election laws in each state without legislature approval

That is all they can do

A criminal investigation would need some sort of recording and videos from the election workers and offical stating that they have been cheating and should be arrested

That is what sidney is doing

In Bush vs. Gore. The court decided to end the election after the recount was finished because of deadline regulation.

There is a certain extend that the court gets tired of listening to voter fraud when there has already been a recount

and end a election from there

Recounts don't help

They are just recounting fraudlent ballots without challenging them.

Meaning Nothing is gonna change

They need to audit and throw ballots out

In GA they identifed (through private means) that there were 20k+ voters who moved states before the election and still voted by mail. The margin in GA is only like 10~

If the courts block the certification by means of litigations and the governor tries to appeal it. It will end up going to the general assembly (Legislator branch). The state election and governor does not decide the electorals as stated in the 12 amendment " Article 2 section 1 Claus 2 "Each state as a legistator thereof direct a number of electors"

Bush v gore wasnt the courts getting tired of hearing about fraud. They stopped it because the democrats were violating the equal protections clause by holding some ballots to a different standard.

any updates lads?

Which is why rudy points out in PA that ballots from some counties were allowed to be "cured" while most could not.

Hey lads I'm gonna post an update in General-shitposting, can someone elaborate it?

no

<:TimeToDiePepe:589190018174812210>

What do you mean by violating equal protection clause?

such as holding some ballots to a different standards?

They were counting votes different. Holding the ballots in miami dade to a different standard than the rest of the state.

Do you think there will be violation under the equal protection clause as Rudy stated?

There already is?

Is it possible to make taco salad and not overload your plate?

There obviously is. My faith in the judicial system is somewhat wanting though.

Its not just faith. Its about evidence that they can prove in the judicial system

Where is the evidence?
\

I know they start counting in the day of night and they stated that they were going to be closing the election office

They coralled poll watchers into pens, there is video eveidence of that, and then they boarded up the windows so nobody could see in

also video evidence of that

In that time period hundreds of thousands of ballots were counted with no way of being challenged

Compared to 2016 we had HUNDREDS of thousands more mail in ballots. In 2016 the rejection rate was up in the 3-10% range with only tens of thousands of ballots. In 2020 the rejection rate dropped to <1% despite there being hundreds of thousands of ballots more.

There is a difference between being present and observating the ballots. And so the election offical had to change the rules to prevent people from getting any closer.

Their 'rule changing' also went against the constituion. The pennselvaniyan court doesn't have the power to change election rules, that goes to the state legislature, yet the PA court did anyway

The state legislature claim that they will not change the outcome of the election

The state legislature will attend Judy Guliani committe hearing

I’ve been in the woods. What have I missed?