Also interested in this!

What is the name of this software anyway? Just curious.

Isn't software besides the point though? I thought the paper ballot investigation was more promising. Focusing on the machines and all that, rather than the paper ballot and the ink does indeed seem like "smoke and mirrors".

Robust measures like 0 (Zero) chain of custody requirements.

It is a wet dream. Especially when those making the claims are not being heard. Especially when democrat judges refuse to hold 50+ requested evidentiary hearings on the voter fraud issue... It is a wet dream. China's wet dream.

You have records for the evidentiary hearings that took place for these cases? Please point me in the right direction and I will gladly agree.

I never said states don't have chain of custody laws. Chain of custody was violated on many levels.

How hilarious is it when that same judge refuses to hold an evidentiary hearing?

How does a judge look at evidence?

😄

Yes. Evidence being eyewitness testimony, audio recordings, video recordings, multiple eye witnesses. All of which we are to just... Take the word of the judge that they single handedly sorted it all out in record time and came to the conclusion that there shouldn't be a hearing?

These kinds of cases take years. \

https://hereistheevidence.com/election-2020/stats/ Baby steps. Start here.

So do you have some sites for me? Some hard truth sites where this is so easily debunked? It must be very easy to do. Should post it on the thing people use to transfer information in the modern age. (Its called the internet)

No. Click the link, dont just look at photos.. oooo ahhhhh

No problemo friendo

So you have no other answer than "accept what you are told slave-peasant"? Yeah, you should move to China. They like your type.

Lol. You have dozens of pictures from fox news and cnn?

You seem to fail to understand that evidence takes time to review. You seem to think that these singular judges are reviewing all this evidence? No. What they are doing is releasing statements and saying that the evidence has no grounds, no merit, blah blah blah... It's very easy to see. These kinds of cases take years, not days or weeks. These judges threw this stuff out without looking at it. It's that plain and simple.

Formalities like peer review?

Give people time to present their evidence for peer review?

Or just throw it out?

Where was the evidence provided? Where and when?

I understand what you are explaining.

The media hype is all that they are after. You guys have clearly learned nothing from how Trump won last time...

I think people are smart enough to know who I am addressing. If its broad for you, then maybe its for you 😄

If it works it works. Does the shoe fit?

Haha, even when present for the conversation? Fascinating. Lets hope we put you in charge of absolutely nothing.

Yes, but we are all virtually present. This is the norm here. I disagree with technology. Use paper. No reason to not use paper other than convenience, and voting shouldn't be an inconvenience for anyone. It's a responsibility. Show your ID. Show your face. Make the mark with your own hands.

On offical printed ballots.

official*

You do know that you're only posting conjecture right?

Recounting unofficial ballots is still unofficial. Look at the paper, look at the ink. The paper is the target and the contention in this election, not the count, not the machines. If you've been paying attention you would know that recounting the ballots isn't what we asked for, we asked for a forensic audit.

For the record, I don't have a problem with technology itself, but not for something this serious, especially WITHOUT ID!!!

Then we should make it.

Because this election is fraudulent!

You should rename yourself deadhorse

I mean, thats what the narrative is. What was the narrative last election?

So who won the election?

If you believe the narrative, sure.

Astounding thing for someone familiar with software to say. Just saying haha.

Well, given the history of mail in ballots around the world, perhaps we should see how many ballots are officially printed, and how many are on copy paper. How many are adjudicated, and how many are not, which counties they are from. If Biden is the president, he's the president, but we have rules to keep ballots for 22 months for a reason.

And who prints the ballots?

lol pretty sure it's companies like Runbeck that print them, not the DHS

Which btw, they do have watermarks and qr codes. Which is where that conspiracy likely comes from. That's why people want an audit of the ballots, the paper, the ink.

The one where the count was different 5 times

Allegedly = Conspiracy

I'm sure anyone that questions the election results is a Trump worshiper lol

What indeed.

Trump "insert noun of your choice"

Trump Car

It's not a conspiracy, it's a Trump "noun"....

Whoa. Nobody else saw it? Fascinating. How do we confirm the seeing of things?

You're asking the wrong questions.

Same, which is why i disagree with your logic on Judges reviewing the evidence.

Does this make sense now?

Hey, now were getting somewhere at least. So which judges didn't look at the evidence and how do we determine that?

I mean, yeah the Texas case is your typical Texas Dogma. Not surprised there at all. Totally agree.

You still have not looked at my link I see.

It's been posted multiple times yet you do not look? AH! Photos, i forgot!

If's it's been confirmed so many times can you point me in the right direction? Fascinating that you assume so much about my character.

If you scroll up, you'll notice that the link he just posted is the first non picture he's posted for a source.... lol My mocking style is based in evidence and experience. Yours seems based in incomplete data.

So from what I gather in this, is that they are saying the data from Sure was incomplete due to missing counties. Then why is the image citing that only a few small counties remain? Keep in mind, the individuals making the statement are ones who would inevitably be apart of the fraud, should it exist at all. Just saying.

I'm sure it would be very easy, but no judges wanted to pursue it. lol.

Is that what it tells me?

I'm saying the dismissal seems a little too swift lol

If you say so.

I disagree with the use of exigent. I don't think the cases need to be rushed. The electors cast their votes, business as usual. The investigation gets... investigated.

Yes, of course. None of which happened.

Meh, writing an essay is too much. I disagree with the rapidity of these dismissals because I believe the media in which we are discussing them is convoluted and corrupted. The perception is wrong. I think the ballots should be looked at, and that the foreign ties and financial backing should be looked into... Half ass working atm.

Because their opinion is conveyed in the media and their conclusion panders to the anti-trump crowd.

I didn't say they don't like Trump, you said that because you want to put me in a box. No No! Their statements have words, words mean things. They pander to the left by using their words in a certain manner that lacks decorum. "conspiracy theory" is a word the left uses to undermine credibility and insinuate some kind of insanity, but the word itself isn't inherently crazy. They could simply dispute the information, but instead they stoop down and use words that lack decorum. This behavior, coupled with their swiftness, the history of voterfraud, the throwing out of observers, boarding up walls, convenient pandemic 6' rules to view ballots, freudian slips etc. It's all pretty odd.

So one must be in a box to identify other boxes? Interesting.

All you have to do is deny the box lol.

I am doing so. 😄

When did I say this?

I'm not disagreeing that I am putting people in boxes lol...

I'm not going to embrace your box if it's the wrong box lol

I never put you in a box and you never denied a box? You are just trying to put me in a box.... And you failed.

I agree with most of your Trump point. I disagree with Biden. I believe bloodshed is really the only answer though, unfortunately.

Founding fathers seemed to not think so.

Lol. What exactly does that mean?

😆

Then I agree! Our immune systems are ancient!

Of course, proxy wars fought on brown people soil. Who cares about those...

Didn't say you did.

or didnt

I totally agree with you about technology and risk.

The sonic stuff is cool. Alot of the sound tech is very fascinating. Directional control and what not

Thank you for the reference? Honestly I hope it goes up on Pay Per View. I'd love to see the security cam footage in the white house as it goes down.

"Wait! There's more!" Waiting for this one.

Lol. I'm sure his time frame doesn't agree with anyone elses time frame

In Wyoming and North Dakota you can basically arrange marriage for anyone as long a judge agrees with it... Religion and cult followings have alot of power over peoples lives when it comes to marriage and sexual consent in these states...

The idea of agency changes given cultural beliefs, accepted truths.

I agree with you.

It is in other countries.