Every hardcore Trump supporter willing to speak truth to power is thrown under the bus immediately.

Astounding thing for someone familiar with software to say. Just saying haha.

@Mox, you just advanced to level 4!

I mean, this goes for most programmers as well. Not to say we don't make mistakes and things go under the radar, they do.

Sometimes it's a simple syntax error, misplaced ; or extra set of brackets which are hard to spot, but ruin the entire function and/or the entire program forcefully terminates if there is no error handling.

Well, given the history of mail in ballots around the world, perhaps we should see how many ballots are officially printed, and how many are on copy paper. How many are adjudicated, and how many are not, which counties they are from. If Biden is the president, he's the president, but we have rules to keep ballots for 22 months for a reason.

I mean, sure, seems fine.

We can’t even get the rumor mill aka Trump legal team to be honest about who prints ballots

Who cares who prints them when their votes get flipped in adjudication

And who prints the ballots?

This would show up on hand count.

The states not the dhs in a secret conspiracy using special paper to prove fraud

lol pretty sure it's companies like Runbeck that print them, not the DHS

Which btw, they do have watermarks and qr codes. Which is where that conspiracy likely comes from. That's why people want an audit of the ballots, the paper, the ink.

the hand count in which state

The one where the count was different 5 times

Allegedly

Allegedly = Conspiracy

coffee county

It’s not a conspiracy just a Trump elector disagreeing with what happened 😆

I'm sure anyone that questions the election results is a Trump worshiper lol

What?

It’s a bit odd claim to make

What indeed.

Literally no one implied anyone who doesn't accept the results is a Trump supporter.

This sounds like some random strawman.

Trump "insert noun of your choice"

Trump Buck?

Trump Orange?

Trump Car

So the machine counted the ballots 5 times and got different results but nobody else saw it and then the hand recount matched and then the 2nd recount matched?

My point still stands, it's kinda a random strawman.

It's not a conspiracy, it's a Trump "noun"....

That’s pretty lucky

Whoa. Nobody else saw it? Fascinating. How do we confirm the seeing of things?

How did they know which of the 5 results was the actual vote count

You're asking the wrong questions.

What are the right questions? How does seeing work isn’t doing it for me

Same, which is why i disagree with your logic on Judges reviewing the evidence.

Does this make sense now?

Sure, some judges didn't look at the lawsuits.