They have weighed the law state legislatures should overturn elections and said no. They have weighed if being upset about changes to election laws should invalid votes and said no. They have weighed if a state should be able to dictate how another state should run its election and said no. They are weighing if the VP should be able to just choose a winner and will say no.

Agreed.

They're all incompetent.

All sides

If there is no risk of accountability, dems will push much more radical stuff if left unopposed.

yes they are.

Agreed, everyone is incompetent.

I have some dozens of judicial verdicts but I dont want to get too spammy 😄

Lol. You have dozens of pictures from fox news and cnn?

Judges are reviewing the cases not just dismissing them on laches or standing. They CAN toss them aside without looking at them but instead choose to review what was there and explicitly say even if standing and laches was not a problem you still have no case.

Pretty polar opposite.

No most of my clips are from the direct legal documents. I just didnt feel like tracking that singular Fox one down

But you could just look at the docs themselves they cite.

You seem to fail to understand that evidence takes time to review. You seem to think that these singular judges are reviewing all this evidence? No. What they are doing is releasing statements and saying that the evidence has no grounds, no merit, blah blah blah... It's very easy to see. These kinds of cases take years, not days or weeks. These judges threw this stuff out without looking at it. It's that plain and simple.

They take years primarily because of formalities and red tape.

Formalities like peer review?

Formalities like deadlines.

Giving people time to respond, etc.

The judges are allowing the cases to be expedited. You still need to produce evidence and legal arguments

Give people time to present their evidence for peer review?

Or just throw it out?

Where was the evidence provided? Where and when?

I'm explaining why cases take years.

I understand what you are explaining.

https://www.newsweek.com/pro-trump-lawyer-lin-wood-said-he-might-actually-second-coming-christ-lawsuit-1558400

Ugh Lin Wood.

@meglide Happy New Year

_insert expletive._

What's to stop the Trump team to pull up in an 18 wheeler at the different polling locations and demand that the truckload of ballots be counted? Fight fire with fire

Kraken "experts" were produced in those cases. Courts found them to be not experts and/or commiting obvious perjury. Many of the "star witnesses" have been presented places like when Judge Kenny reviews Carone's testimony and found her with no knowledge on the process and lying and not squaring with hundreds of other people there. Cases like in AZ let them do their full lineup of witnesses and found nothing there. Michigan they brought in tech testimony vs dominion and failed. Georgia as well.

Lin wood is a National Treasure.

The media hype is all that they are after. You guys have clearly learned nothing from how Trump won last time...

@Mox, you just advanced to level 3!

You're making a pretty broad assumption here when you say 'you guys'.

nobody voted for HilaRY?

They asked to prove the "potential" fraud like double voters or dead voters and they could not. They asked to prove ballot stuffing and they could not. They asked how Georgia beat the paper recount and they could not explain it.

seems Trump forgot how he won also

I think people are smart enough to know who I am addressing. If its broad for you, then maybe its for you 😄

Trump won by stealing a bunch of facebook data and manipulating persuadable folks 😄

Weird logic, but okay.

let's face it, nobody liked Hilary.