need to find out what lead to the completely 180

```In the years preceding the massacre, Huguenot "political rhetoric" had for the first time taken a tone against not just the policies of a particular monarch of France, but monarchy in general. In part this was led by an apparent change in stance by John Calvin in his Readings on the Prophet Daniel, a book of 1561, in which he had argued that when kings disobey God, they "automatically abdicate their worldly power" – a change from his views in earlier works that even ungodly kings should be obeyed. This change was soon picked up by Huguenot writers, who began to expand on Calvin and promote the idea of the sovereignty of the people, ideas to which Catholic writers and preachers responded fiercely.[11]```

this also was an issue

from the same article

unf the killing of the Huguenots lead to more anti-monarchial sentiment

much like how the Easter Rising in Ireland lead to anti-monarchial sentiment against the british in Ireland almost 300+ years later

martyrs are the vanguard of any revolution

```The royal marriage was arranged for 18 August 1572. It was not accepted by traditionalist Catholics or by the Pope. Both the Pope and King Philip II of Spain strongly condemned Catherine's Huguenot policy as well.```

this was also another compounded issue

rough

oof

hard times incoming

"The Israel Lobby" by John Mearsheimer is good too

Yeah but the read is good regardless

https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/israel-lobby-and-us-foreign-policy

the pdf is in here

you'd be surprised lol

it's beginner stuff, which is why it's a good read

"lol we know so we don't need to expand upon it"

for people who support israel it's an eye opener at just how much money and influence they have

then when you compare it with "russian interference" it dwarfs

ok fed

i hate all jews (((my fellow whites)))

👀

Yeah dude, know where to buy unmarked firearms? That'd be awesomirino if you could tell me

^

no serial number

untraceable

^

@LimaGolf he doesn't get it

whoosh

precisely

@21ooAB ok reposter

absolute autism

he's the resident autist in one of the other servers we're in

where do you think he got the post

but he's our autist <3

Doubt, I don't think he'll run

Hawley or DeSantis

ye

Hawley is about the same

ping again and there will be shit on on your pillow

._.

#3 I would say applies only to our brothers and sisters in Christ

Pagans/Atheists BTFO

>trump does inflation thing

>"fiat is dead"

how braindead can you be to believe this

"haha the printer go brrr so banks die"

LOL

the truth is just the opposite of rational wiki

https://twitter.com/SergGroyper/status/1249373349869785088

The issue with a linear dichotomy is that if you dont do it right you get contradictions like that skele

lel

I think a linear dichotomy in general is fake and gay ofc

The 4 quadrants are far better

y-axis: authority vs. liberty
x-axis: left vs. right economics

left economics usually mean more control, either by the state or the people (as literal owners),

right usually means more control by the people (as consumers) and by the corporations/large firms

authority vs. liberty is simple

dont need to explain that

you can (sort of) put ideologies on either axes for the economics

not so much for authority

nigbo

correct

probably the best way to describe it

authoritarian collectivists (i.e. center on economics) seek a mix of group preference and worker's profit

Charles Coughlin, Huey Long, and Teddy Roosevelt for example

I would still consider that liberal

That is sort of an oxymoron

"live and let live unless you're x"

this is how you get publicly pushed and enforced homosexuality

transgenderism

etc

correct

its a gay pov