Message from @rybus
Discord ID: 701491509559820448
@(JUMP) 璟熙帝 are you Chinese?
no i'm just an obsessive anglo who likes china.
Based
So you wanna Qing dynasty back?
New BitChute exclusive video will be out today.
@WanderingRusski uhhhh'
oof
I hope that groypers show up at those "hear questions from undecided voters" events
@Mr.Fisch(炫龙) sorry I had to go, if I were alive as a chinese person in 1912 i would have supported the Qing, in modern day restroation isn't really possible.
I see
Chad
So is collectivism inherently right-wing and individualism left-wing? If so then why is Marxism, a very collectivist economic system, considered left wing and capitalism, a very individualistic economic system, considered right wing?
The issue with a linear dichotomy is that if you dont do it right you get contradictions like that skele
lel
I think a linear dichotomy in general is fake and gay ofc
The 4 quadrants are far better
Different positions kinda manifest themselves in different ways when looking at the political compass.
left economics usually mean more control, either by the state or the people (as literal owners),
right usually means more control by the people (as consumers) and by the corporations/large firms
authority vs. liberty is simple
dont need to explain that
you can (sort of) put ideologies on either axes for the economics
not so much for authority
nigbo
Libertarians will champion harbor individualism, but we’ll champion a more collective mindset. But of course the left and right will interpret those things differently. Right wing individualists will champion self sufficiency and such, while left wing individualists tend to champion shit like sexual liberation and such. Right wing collectivists tend to seek advancing their own group’s interests, while left wing collectivists in my view tend to seek material equality amongst all humans.
correct
probably the best way to describe it
authoritarian collectivists (i.e. center on economics) seek a mix of group preference and worker's profit
Charles Coughlin, Huey Long, and Teddy Roosevelt for example
An lib right would most likely personally oppose LGBT stuff but have a live and let live mindset.
I would still consider that liberal
That is sort of an oxymoron
"live and let live unless you're x"
this is how you get publicly pushed and enforced homosexuality
transgenderism