So, you are giving me a quote from one author to say that feminism is not what it is defined to be?

Well, I don't think so that we can talk anything meaningful if you will prop out a custom made definition as a rebuttal.

Lol, the point is simply this, which you seem to ignore. If what you are saying is actually right, why didn't Marxists critique it for so long?
Well, Cuck Philosophy gave the answer himself. It is because that even promoted this form of equality, at least as a slogan

The point is you are literally absolving Marxists of being what you think was anti Marxist behaviour all along

So, Marxists cannot be trusted?

I cannot fathom that. You said that equality is not a goal for Marxists. But then say that they pushed it as a slogan. That is not disingenuous?

Do you think pushing something as a slogan though you don't believe in it is untrustworthy?

Because I think it is

That is what I am talking about

Jordan Peterson also does not say that about Marxism. Cuck Philosophy, I think he was who did that, strawmanned him by taking a quote of him out of context

In the Joe Rogan podcast, Peterson made clear that he was talking about class distinction

And on his numerous lectures

Me. I am an idealist

Well, I would find myself on Right, I guess. Maybe far Right. Though I don't subscribe to many Right Wing ideas

Because materialism does not explain mind, and Dualism fails to explain Chalmer's Problem

It cannot. For it to explain that, it would require to explain qualia

And intentionality

Why would Marxism/Communism abolish class? What is wrong with class?

No. I am Right Wing obviously

That means no boss, lol.

But would you allow him to exercise his power even if he fails a majority test for a specified duration?

So, he is boss in name only, right? It is more like a direct democratic system

So, no boss essentially. Because a boss could make no rules and do nothing without majority approval

The role of boss is to act as an intermediary between the owners and the workers

It is just that. If management says that you have to work for one more hour, it would make owner happy, but workers unhappy

Well, that is the role of a boss. Lets say we have a boss like you say. Before making every decision he would have to take care that his approval rating does not fall, right?

There is no direct democracy in cooperative system

AnCaps don't believe in laws

Labour power is a commodity in capitalism too

lol. If labour power is ability to use labour, the ability to use labour power is the ability to use ability to use labour

What that even means

You said this -
Where labour power become a commodity
Or more accurately the ability to labour is a commodity

In any case, the ability to use labour is in capitalism

So, what is the problem?

Problem with capitalism

Well, labour has a value in capitalism. So, what is the next critique of capitalism?

Isn't cyclical economic crisis much better than an economic crisis that always persists?

To have a recession, you need to have a period of good growth.

Lol, Russia's story of growth is an exaggeration

Do you have some stats for that?

Lol, I won't trust CIA. Which period you are talking about?

Lol, I won't trust CIA. Which period you are talking about?

If you think that CIA is trustworthy then no one can help you

Because we think CIA is not what it seems to you.

Even Marxists disagree with you.

https://www.marxists.org/history/ussr/government/economics/statistics/growth-rates.htm

Lol, I thought Marx also believed in conspiracy theory of bankers.

What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.…. Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities…. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange…. The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general. - Karl Marx

If those Jews get in power, would they still regard money as highest goal?

We know that Jews are in very powerful position by just observing statistics. The only question is whether they have some other motives

And Karl Marx agrees that they have

Thus we find every tyrant backed by a Jew, as is every pope by a Jesuit. In truth, the cravings of oppressors would be hopeless, and the practicability of war out of the question, if there were not an army of Jesuits to smother thought and a handful of Jews to ransack pockets. - Karl Marx

It can be both. White Guilt?

Male Guilt?

I just referenced you quotes. Lol. Anyways

It is not the corporations. It is the people. There are people who want to regulate speech. Corporations are just a tool.

It is not profitable for Google to censor Conservatives.

That is simply untrue. In that leaked video, it was clear that they are being driven by ideology. Moreover, have they not seen a single poll? Most Americans said that they hate political correctness but still they implemented live chat censor ship feature

I find it hard to believe that they don't see polls and current affairs. They can easily analyse their own data and see how many people like political correctness or transgenderism

Which is against political correctness. Their average consumer does not want them. Only 9% gen z are progressives.

Or as I remember

Lol

Well generation after millennials

I don't know what the survey used but neither the population now nor of future wants Google to do this

I don't think Marx would have loved trannies tbh

20% are far right

Well that is not what the survey asked

It just asked people to self identify

As people grow older they become more Conservative

Boomers are NPC

It is not immigration. It is because they are facing consequences of liberalism

Conservatives are not liberals

Not liberal.

Do you think all liberals would accept America as it was in 1840?

They won't because freedom of speech and capitalism are not inherently liberal.

Before Marx almost everyone was a capitalist.

This is why Fedual lords retained earnings made on their land

Or part of it

Capitalism is just a system wherein giver of capital enjoys share in profits

Enlightenment led to Marxism actually. Feudalism lost because of industrialism

And colonialism was start of industrialism the main reason to make colonies was to get resources.

To support industries

Incidents like Paris Commune show otherwise

It would make no sense for people to not capture unproductive parts because it would be a very low cost to acquire them

That is like saying why would people take a free tissue with dinner

Supposedly yes

"scientific"😂

It is not. The only two theories that are dominant in economics for example, Keynesian and free market, both are different than Marxist economics

Only Marxists says that their view is scientific. No one else does

It is simple. Whether you agree that these two are only dominant theories and whether Marxism is different than them

I am trying to break down the argument in logical form.

Well I just call myself on Right and even that a little uncomfortably. I am not a Neo con or traditionalist or conservative or rothbardian or libertarian.

Do you want me to lay my every position? 😂
I know that.

Well. I believe that capitalism is good for growth and social welfare should be provided locally by communities like as in Mormons have

No. Because there are many positions wherein I differ from conservatives. But if you think that alone makes you conservative then fine.

Lol. On a lot of issues. Like I am pro environmentalism and pro animal welfare. I am ok with hawkish stance but do not like democracy. I do not support extreme punishment for serious crimes

Neither. I am surely not a liberal

No. Not a vegan

I don't find any problem with milk 😀

I think government is a bad actor that is why @Reeves !Musicbot