"Suspected far-right extremists veiled a Holocaust memorial in Lakewood, New Jersey, with a banner displaying an ethnic slur against Jews. It comes amid ongoing police investigation into massive welfare fraud, implicating a local rabbi."

Lol these responses on Twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/ADL_NJ/status/881567556041138176

I like how they're offering a 10k reward for info on this "defacement"/"hate crime" when it literally consists of a sheet that these goys probably paid ~$5 for

Is there a cleaner burning oil that can be used in the torches instead of the tiki crap?

That was awful last time

Have you ever spent time in the middle of 150 torches all burning citronella crap?

I can't imagine it'll be better with the number tripled

Would've preferred mosquitos tbqh

Alt tiki fuel: https://www.hunker.com/12409766/homemade-tiki-torch-fuel

"A simple oil lamp fuel made from isopropyl alcohol and distilled water will burn in a tiki torch. Pure olive oil or coconut oil will burn clean in a tiki torch and do not require mixing."

@Commander Davis (TWP) I love that flag. Tbh libertarians aren't so bad once they realize the racial foundation necessary for their model of society.

Alex Jones has joined the meme war against CNN: https://www.infowars.com/20k-prize-infowars-great-cnn-meme-war-contest-announced/

Yes, most of the intellectually honest ones have already come to our side.

Well, they use it. So...

Indeed. And that's what libertarians see themselves as trying to defend.

Or, rather, they used to anyway.

Lol. Go ahead and stop them, I guess. But they've been using it for quite some time, and that's the association made by many people when they see the flag.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The libertarians themselves use it, and think of it as theirs... so that's where the subversion aspect comes in by making it into a fascist flag.

It doesn't really matter what other people associate with it, in this context.

You should fly one of these instead

Lest people mistake you for a libertarian lol

I guess it's just come to represent too individualistic an outlook for me to identify with the Gadsden flag

Idk, I think it would just give them more a reason to openly disavow

The fasces Gadsden might get them curious since it's similar, but also representing an idea many libertarians reject immediately - the sense of a cohesive "us"

Yes.

https://youtu.be/aq9ceia8wY8

A year ago I would've laughed if someone told me Fox news would be talking about the superiority of the West, while denigrating the SPLC

Here's the segment that was before that one: https://youtu.be/rZDFRwGEcZs

I'd say he's probably somewhere around Proud Boys powerlevel right now. Hopefully he continues moving further right.

No, that's a trad gf

Trad and fashy are not interchangeable tbh

I doubt that

Mask laws will absolutely be enforced

They were at the KKK rally

Bring her to cville but not the rally.

Well, that's my advice.

There will be plenty of other things to do down there that won't include potential bricks to the head.

Leaving before everyone else does is probably going to be a bad idea. Best to stay with large groups of people.

K

It's private now

Get there before dark 👌

@MadDimension there are people on /pol/ who will counter signal literally anything we do that doesn't involve anonymously posting memes online, so I wouldn't worry too much about their reaction to be honest. They'll be at home watching the live streams & if antifa get violent /pol/ will autistically go thru footage to identify who did it & report them to police. For the most part, their role in all this is purely online activity, anything that involves IRL happenings is going to get talked about as if it's part of a super secret plan that the (((elites))) have come up with.

That's not what net neutrality is, I think. Afaik it's more along the lines of websites and services being able to pay ISPs to allow more bandwidth for their sites / ISPs being allowed to charge some websites and services more if they exceed a certain bandwidth

It's not about blocking specific sites, but rather giving more resources to some. Net neutrality bill prevents ISPs from being able to do this

IE ISPs want to charge services like Netflix more and/or services like Netflix want to be able to pay a premium for higher bandwidth and net neutrality would prevent that

Exactly. That is the type of thing people AGAINST net neutrality are worried about

Oops

Reverse that

People supporting* net neutrality

It's in our interest that ISPs not be allowed to pick and choose which sites to dedicate more resources to

Yep. Even if we need the government to force ISPs to keep it that way haha

Well that's a whole other issue

I don't think they can use ICANN to take down any of our sites, tbh.

How exactly do you think ICANN will effect anything??

But ICANN doesn't deal with content disputes

That would fall to the domain registrars

@Tyrone I guess I'll worry about that *if* it happens.

Frankly, I don't see how having the US involved would make anyone feel better about it.

Nah, I just know that there are always ways to get around censorship, so I'm not too concerned about it.

Especially on the internet.

Why would they shut down the best avenue for monitoring our activities that they have?

I don't see how it would benefit the jews to force us all into communicating in ways other than electronic

Harder to monitor on a mass scale than websites open to the public are.

Real life interactions.

I absolutely agree that localization is important, (for more reasons than just ease of organization abilities in the case of an internet shut down).

And yes, we freely give away a lot of information about ourselves even though pretty much everyone is aware of how it's being collected and used. Our risk/reward evaluation in regards to tech is really out of whack imo

Anyways, even things like phone calls and sending physical mail are harder to mass monitor than online activity is, assuming they've now got efficient methods of sorting through data collected online.

Is it actually a problem if the chemicals in the water turn the frogs gay?

@MadDimension they probably won't include any reasonable talking points.

The only good articles and videos of interviews by the MSM I've seen are the ones where /ourguys/ are blatantly trolling the journos

@MadDimension they'll probably overlay your statements with videos of the Klan or something

@Tyrone All of our talking points are reasonable but can easily be put into context where they sound absurd

@MadDimension https://youtu.be/fgq03ZDapLI

@MadDimension https://youtu.be/mf2njPRdxsM

@MadDimension It's obviously up to you and other group leaders, but I wouldn't grant them an interview.

@MadDimension Yep. That's why we have our own media now. Put them in the position where they have to pay people like @V I T A L I T Y and Red Ice for content to use

I think interviews for nightly news segment is a bit of a different ballgame than a highly edited production like Nat Geo documentaries, though. With the normal news, at least you know what context they'll be using it in (coverage of whatever event you're at/talking about), a documentary could be anything. "Why White People Should Die" featuring white supreeeeemist Jason Kessler

I'm not arguing that Kessler isn't qualified. He's done some great interviews. Nat geo is just blatantly anti-white & don't deserve the opportunity for an interview when we already know what type of shit they'll use it for..

@The Inquisitor [☧] something like this

😢 I was hoping for rainbow armbands so everyone would know that we believe diversity is our strength

I'm willing to become a martyr for diversity . Prefer woodchipper, though.

Alex Jones will be proven right about everything in time

Hmmmmmm

It looks like it's a sort of family friendly cookout for more normie right wing people

@Athena Marie nah, I'm more worried they might end up with some antifa showing up to surprise them. They were in the Facebook event talking about bringing kids 😕

Lol that's what I'm thinking. I wonder though if someone should warn them..

@Jack Danson - KG I think it's up to whatever group you're coming with, but might as well not make it trashy. Polos and khakis looked good last time.

Hmm?

Oh the swastikas. No, I was just responding to the general question about dress code.

But yeah, flip flops are a really dumb idea

Well, when you're uniting with NS, there might be a swastika or two.

^^

No contact lenses either.

Might be better off going half blind from the get-go tbh

No need to fight about this. The organizers are advising people not involved with security not to carry to avoid legal problems. No one is stopping you from doing it if that's what you want to do.

I'm not sure that it's a question of optics