https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKqMNQdo6Kw

https://twitter.com/Amish_DB_lives/status/1001163920114003968

Dayum

HAIL ELON

also escaped South Africa, the ultimate redpill

You mean new Zimbabwe ?

In Tommy's case, the defense attorney can rightfully argue that the jury didn't evaluate the case on its merits, but on how the media presented it to them, and ask for the sentence to be overturned. So it makes sense the judge wouldn't want media bias interfering. Tommy should not have done that reporting, in both instances.

Now, the gag order about Tommy himself, that was overstepping reason.

firstly, i got into a bit of a debate with a person who claims that (after some reasonable debate) count dankulas case should not be given the same considerations as the trial tommy robinson was attempting to cover. it was my consideration that as a matter of principle, both cases should have been givven the very same considerations one way or the other universally. however they believe i am wrong. what say you well reasoned and not entirely trollish group of pepe's? (post above is reply to this one)

I think both should have been given the same treatment, because both cases ruins reputation

The gag order should relate to the grooming gang case.

and i agree. i see it more as a matter of principle that one way or the other both cases (and to be more general, ALL cases) should be afforded the same fundamental protections by law to prevent undue influence, or none at all should. there should be no in-between

How they decide what to blank out and not I have no idea

Dankula's case had no jury.

true, however they had one person judging the case

and one is just as easily influenced as 12 or however many jurors there are in a british trial

what science do they use to determine what, when and who can film what where and when?

Dankula should have had a right to a jury, and receive the same protection against smearing by the media.

To me it seems they just want the rape gangs under wrap

It could be. We still don't know many details of Tommy's case, like whether they refused him to contact is attorney or not.

It doesn't help that the usual suspects were trying to exaggerate/lie by omission to score some PR points. Like the rumor that Tommy was beaten in prison.

i am mostly a centrist by nature, so i have conflicting views on most subjects, however in this case, the principled path would be to choose an 'either, or' option. either both have media blackouts regarding the trial, or they do not

any partiality just shows the inequal method by which people are tried

-shrugs- i know i've got him on the ropes as he's intentionally ignoring the 'or' side of my point

either way i've given him enough of my brain power for the day, moving on

The gag order is to prevent biasing the jury. If there's no jury, the gag order serves no purpose.

The unfairness to Dankula wasn't that he didn't get a gag order to protect him from the media's smear campaign. It was that he wasn't allowed a jury.

Also, having no gag order actually helped make his case more public.

ffs our version of BBC outright lied about the Starbucks incidendt and said the policy(where you dont have to buy before using bathroom or be inside the store for good lengths) was that before the incident
holy shit

i'm aware of that dko

it's one of my arguments that either they should have the same media coverage, or not have any media coverage

as it skews one way or another with or without them

to make the argument more concise i made the point that 'you cannot eliminate all biases in all counts, but you can eliminate the inequity of one trial having more protections than another by affording them the same protections period, it's only a matter of how you might decide which version of protections you use. by making invisible trials from the public, or by making all trials visible to the public

https://youtu.be/QYRjYE4MnAY

Shapiro argued that the whole thing about preventing jury bias is stupid, and shouldn't be a law. Even more so because the UK can't prevent foreign outlets from reporting and commenting on cases.

https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/33714534_2170672106281760_8548834718504714240_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=061a9dfe257b357ff3faa7873caf3e0f&oe=5B8D665C

Leftist pro imigration propaganda be like:

"You don't want the wages to be lowered because of immigrants that are willing to work for much cheaper then you? Well let me as a upper middle class brat who never had to lift my finger in my entire life, except for when I am fisting myself, tell you how evil you the working class is and how I am standing up for the unpriveleged and hard working ~~only the non-white part of the~~ working class!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwkIy0SJzqQ

Watch this scene. This was 1999

https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/1001570489532284928

https://twitter.com/TheQuartering/status/1001574779554533377

https://www.dailywire.com/news/31213/watch-rncs-first-ms-13-ad-against-democrats-james-barrett

Nancy just keeps giving them ammunition

@DanielKO @Sin Its beside the point A: he was very careful not to introduce facts and B: It was the final session, he couldn't influence the jury anyway

And of coarse, you couldn't possibly get a report, arrest him, find out he didn't do it, find out he did something else, collect evidence, decide to press charges (pun not intended), find a court booking, hold trial, convict and finally sentence fairly in FOUR FUCKING HOURS

Only a 4000 away from 500k

What is?

The Robinson petition

Ah

@Lion Hamster GMT+999994 1. in totalitarian society, it is easy to come up with excuses to silence people. he gave them the excuse they needed, the issue was not what he did, but that he violated a court order and is now silenced for it. at the very least that's my take on it

2. it's GB, did you expect any less?

He didn't violate the court ordrr

They're claiming he did, but they're lying

O.O https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4uJqhVNRIM

This is what's on the ballot in my state.

Oh yeah, heard about that guy

The Californian David duke

That’s what happens when you have one political party dominate a district

Here's a restricted video where he starts off about the JQ and "dropping redpills out the bomb bay door of my the b-52 with my senate campaign" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxAMTc7q52Y&bpctr=1527663434

🤦

He’s destroying what’s left of the California GOP

straight up calling Jews evil monsters and claiming to be second in the polls to Dianne Feinstein

good lord this guy thinks 1 in 3 people in california is "woke to the JQ"

mfw I cringe so hard I almost go full retard

Lol

Here's the cherry on top, on the ballot, it says he's a "Civil Rights Advocate"

what a fucking joke

He’s so retarded

As long as he isn't claiming to be a Republican or a conservative 👌

Then again, they all seem to try

Whilst simultaneously dissing conservatives, so I guess that sums up a lot about their mindset in general really

^

They can't claim they are fascists or neo Nazis or something like that

So

Conservative it is

He's running as a Republican. 😐

Rip the California gop

Oh well

gg

Nuke California

Part of me thinks "well, it's CA, not like an R can win there anyway"

And then part of me thinks how Rs have been gaining ground there

I'm guessing this is just the primaries though

In which case he won't win

I think Duke ran as an R once, and even got the nomination, and the Rs still told him to fuck off

He also ran as a Democrat several times, which noone seems to remember 🤔

```Duke ran as a Republican in the 1992 presidential primaries, although Republican Party officials tried to block his participation. He received 119,115 (0.94%) votes in the primaries, but no delegates to the national convention```

120k

Duke is a member of the 1% it seems <:think_woke:378717098681171988>

Wew

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYRjYE4MnAY

One of the interesting points Shapiro brings up is how the French Revolution got it all wrong, trumping individual rights in favor of group rights.

France was a mistake.

mmm

Honestly most revolutions don't really turn out too well

>Honestly most revolutions don't really turn out too well
no shit

you're just burning everything down around you

He contrasts with the American revolution, that got individual rights over collective rights.

"silly trumptards! there's no pizza child sex ring!"

*m e a n w h i l e*

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/27/cnns-april-ryan-slammed-for-tweeting-article-about-trump-running-child-trafficking-ring.html