Message from @Crabtree
Discord ID: 450985879918477312
And the God they based their acts on, what it's like.
For instance, the fact that God can't be of the realm of men. Not a God King, God Emperor, God Pharaoh. There's a meaning behind this particular decision, on how to depict God. And it's most certainly not a universal trait of all religions.
The very concept that a King owes something to a greater entity, greater purpose, greater good.
if it was directed at me I wasn't brushing off stories in religious texts as nonsense , nor did I say so
Not you, but the likes of Dawkins and Hitchens.
k cool
I d like to see Peterson start a media network like brietbart
The Chinese emperors being buried with their armies, concubines, servants. Just so they could continue having power, sex and comfort in the afterlife. The Judeo-Christian God is a symbol that's directly against it. Why didn't the Chinese come up with that idea? They certainly had a very long history to figure it out.
also tho the story where Jesus was cursing the Figg tree for not producing fruit has a funny connotation .
And boy, do we have Figg trees today...
me idk about that , if you ask an archeologist , what we know about the past is really mixed up and very vague to say the least
We call them faggots though.
The education systen needs to be fixed tbh
https://youtu.be/zDZFcDGpL4U
nah, the Starship Troopers film sucks monkey balls, the book is what Sargon is going to be doing a video on
and ffs is he taking his time on it
would be funny if Peterson ends up turning the online atheists into a new crusade though =p
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1001305267768770561
TULSI <:covfefe:440543908846632980>
Dayum
also escaped South Africa, the ultimate redpill
You mean new Zimbabwe ?
In Tommy's case, the defense attorney can rightfully argue that the jury didn't evaluate the case on its merits, but on how the media presented it to them, and ask for the sentence to be overturned. So it makes sense the judge wouldn't want media bias interfering. Tommy should not have done that reporting, in both instances.
Now, the gag order about Tommy himself, that was overstepping reason.
firstly, i got into a bit of a debate with a person who claims that (after some reasonable debate) count dankulas case should not be given the same considerations as the trial tommy robinson was attempting to cover. it was my consideration that as a matter of principle, both cases should have been givven the very same considerations one way or the other universally. however they believe i am wrong. what say you well reasoned and not entirely trollish group of pepe's? (post above is reply to this one)
I think both should have been given the same treatment, because both cases ruins reputation
The gag order should relate to the grooming gang case.
and i agree. i see it more as a matter of principle that one way or the other both cases (and to be more general, ALL cases) should be afforded the same fundamental protections by law to prevent undue influence, or none at all should. there should be no in-between
How they decide what to blank out and not I have no idea
Dankula's case had no jury.
true, however they had one person judging the case
and one is just as easily influenced as 12 or however many jurors there are in a british trial
what science do they use to determine what, when and who can film what where and when?
Dankula should have had a right to a jury, and receive the same protection against smearing by the media.
To me it seems they just want the rape gangs under wrap
It could be. We still don't know many details of Tommy's case, like whether they refused him to contact is attorney or not.
It doesn't help that the usual suspects were trying to exaggerate/lie by omission to score some PR points. Like the rumor that Tommy was beaten in prison.
i am mostly a centrist by nature, so i have conflicting views on most subjects, however in this case, the principled path would be to choose an 'either, or' option. either both have media blackouts regarding the trial, or they do not
any partiality just shows the inequal method by which people are tried
-shrugs- i know i've got him on the ropes as he's intentionally ignoring the 'or' side of my point
either way i've given him enough of my brain power for the day, moving on