general
Discord ID: 267086373285134338
257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 465/1029
| Next
"sex assigned at birth" really puts the lie to the whole "gender is a social construct, sex is biological" thing
sex assigned at birth = doctor looks at your penis
says yup
that's a penis
shut up bigot it could have been a female penis
haha
until the US grapples with this entrenched hidden bureaucracy
there can be no real change in direction
it's unfortunate to see people losing faith in Trump due to apparent capitulations on the foreign policy front
where he is ultimately beholden to these entrenched interests
Presidents come and go
it is this apparatus that runs the US miiltary / geopolitical machine
these people have long term plans for various regions that will proceed regardless of who is in office
all that may happen is minor re-orientation
Trump's only asset is ordinary people, he doesn't have anything else to bring to the table in terms of tangible assets
he has no connections or good will with the entrenched people, he doesn't represent some other large interest like wall street or industry
he is a populist in the truest sense of the term, and to fight the above he needs for this support to stay strong and unwavering
for the most part it appears ordinary people are holding on and staying strong
but online, in alt right circles etc. there seems to be a strange attitude, where people signal their purity by being anti-Trump
sort of like a mirror image of liberals I guess
Well why isnt trump building up a military force outside of the state something like the SA or SS in Germany that he can use as a pressure tool to get his way and hopefully abolish the republic and establish absolute monarchy and cleanse the foreign elites that subverted academia, media and finance of the plane of existence
Why the fighting
We are all people yes, we bleed the same we shit brown the same
I put my shoes on one pants at a time like you friends
We are equal yes
trump's been compromised via jared kushner
things might work themselves out though, especially since /pol/ is getting close to figuring out the nitty gritty of seth rich's death
*oh shit*
that alone would weaken the forces keeping trump from doing what he said he would
what a fucking mess tho
This Kushner stuff is ridiculous
Kushner has no leverage
Why would he have pull over Trump rather than vice versa
Even in opposition
People absorb media narrative
By subtly forcing adoption of inverted narrative
Putting thinking in a box basically
So like becoming a communist from anti fascism
Or a feminist from anti islam
Or anti Kushner from pro Bannon
When its all noise
because he's ivanka's husband
and he took out a $250 million dollar loan from george soros
also ivanka was in the flight logs to lolita island
Epstein had a lot of elite friends. This in itself does not point to anything. Trump himself knew Epstein well.
As for being Ivanka's husband, that should make Kushner Trump dependent rather than the other way round
Kushner offers Chabad networking which makes him useful for dealing with Russia and Israel through non deep state channels
kushner runs the online trump stuff
He gets shit because he is a jew. That is about it as far as I can see
research more
Yeah, on Trump's recognizance though.
I know all about it
Say something substabtial, not research more. I wont cast aspertions on what you know
"Perhaps the most devastating psy-op that the Deep State has run against the Alt-Right was to implant the idea that Jared Kushner had begun to sabotage the President's agenda, against a more loyal individual like Steve Bannon (in reality, the two are Trumpists). This hysteria culminated in a #FireKushner hashtag trending on Twitter for an entire evening. Whoever was in charge of that psy-op was rewarded very handsomely for identifying the paranoid tendency within a subset of the Right, and figuring out who was obsessed with individuals rather than interest groups. Only such an audience would buy such a story."
The above is the only reasonable analysis I have seen but I do think most people have a hesitant approach to such labelling
He correctly identifies the trend in the alt right towards snowballing demonization
Personalities are not unimportant but have to be in the context of what they offer/the power they have
The alt right umbrella has some very credulous people under it now it seems to me
Early on the adopters were more skeptical and big picture
Anglin sort of stuff made the environment more breathless offense and trolling
Which may have been good I dunno
But certainly has some negative effects
A big issue with focus on enemy is lack of focus on oneself
Which is very important in the anti leftist struggle
It is primarily a war in the subtle realm. A war of ideas. A war for hearts and minds.
In a sense a spiritual rather than temporal war
The temporal issues are played up but are not so important
Immigrants vastly outnumber locals in gulf states but they maintain local power and culture.
The immigrants could be expelled in a month if need be
As the gulf states have an attitude conducive to that
the alt right is teeming with entryists
@sampletext if you have something to show me regarding Kushner I am all eyes/ears
What about the 666 building
Certainly that's odd
What is that
666 5th avenue?
He would still be a yid all things considered
And the smiling when the lady was crying about her dead husband
Those are the only two things that really stuck out, plus the soros connection
Coulter said he was doing a good job
He could be an evil representative of the occultic kabbalist luciferian order but he still would not have pull, that is the issue. His agency.
right
he's important to trump
obviously
Yeah whatever the scenario he would be useful to Trump
Trump seems to value loyalty very highly
An old school approach
Good for what he needs to do
Everyone was angry that Trump said he hoped Comey would see that Flynn is a good guy and drop the probe but I respected that loyalty. Same with his defense of Lewandowski over that Breitbart reportress's assault fib
This sort of stuff should be tuned out honestly
Even people who understand the pervasive lies of the media
Remain dependent in it to form their views at some level
To validate their views I guess
Even the illegitimate media is considered legitimate in a doublethink fashion
Because there is nothing else really
Trump said he hoped, which may have been dropped deliberately but doesnt matter either way
yeah. they try to slide stuff past people without the rhetorical tools to see the trick.
I deal with the same thing at work all day. it would be funny or interesting if it weren't so sinister
The Jews are the most blatant at attempting it
Dunno why
dunno. cultural tradition of rabbinical / hermeneutics text-parsing coupled with a constant feeling of being on the outs?
anyone think anything will come of Kim Dotcoms announcement about Seth Rich today?
THAT IS WHY YOU NEED
A CASTE SYSTEM
WHAT ARE THE OPINIONS OF PROLES ON POLITICS?
A: GRAFFITI
here's a question though:
What is the benefit of a delineated and known caste system vs. a "de facto" caste system that functionally exists but isn't written down and enforced legally
a system without drawn borders does not exist
Right but do those borders have to be clear and legal
or can they be softer and cultural
THEY MUST BE CULTURAL AND LEGAL
But let's say they're only cultural
what's the argument for making them true legal boundaries
IF SOMETHING IS GOOD, WHY NOT MAKE IT LEGAL?
AND IF YOU DO NOT, IT WILL BE ATTACKED USING THE LAW
your second point is really good I think
that's what's happening
THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE LAW
I PREFER RULE BY ARISTOCRATS
ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS
for example, supreme court upholding disparate impact challenges under the fair housing act
ENTIRELY
LAWYERS ARE NOT LEADERS
THEY ARE BUSINESSMEN WHO DEPEND ON A MONOPOLY
my fave super hero is a lawyer
i'm going to law school
are you blind
I'm a lawyer
spiritually blind
nice
nice
how bad does it suck
I like my job. but i'm in a specific niche I made a lot of sacrifices to get into
yes
lawyering seems hard
and greasy
like a greasy sort of affair
did you sacrifice your soul
it's a big field. there are greasy areas and fine areas. diversity_is_racism is right about lawyers and leadership/policy. They shouldn't be making decisions.
I didn't sacrifice my soul. I'm doing exactly what I wanted to do and it's really interesting. But I know a lot of people who did.
lawyers who get paid to defend child molestors shouldn't make laws to begin with
or advocate or anything
i dunno man it seems like they take cash no matter what
why cant we just go back to public executions
like in the center of town square
leave the bodies rot in the open so ppl wont want to break laws
most lawyers defending child molesters get paid dogshit by the state as public defenders
well
i mean thats good
dont defend the shitty public ud get paid more
I and Foucault agree with you on public executions
its save us so much money and time
esp if its proven without a doubt
just takem from the court to the hangin block
or heck even pillarys
those are fun
Pillorys
i think the prison system is a joke tbh
its too cushy compared to some places. its a money grab as well. and the "death row" people who never actually get killed at the end of the day costs the tax payers more than what some folk make in a year
i think what we should do is do a clean sweep of the prison system once the wall is buily
purge them all. empty it. minor offenses/nonviolent crimes should be given a mandatory service in our military under a special branch or something and made to earn their freedom back
the rest can be dealt with more permanently.
now im not saying to just round them up and shooting them or whatever.
why not just starve them out or something.
i dunno man the world is weird
explain
Hmm i think that the last sentence explains it quite well, what is unclear for you?
that last message makes sense
sorta like how me and my sister got in a fight over rent
she wont pay her half unless i give her spending money
so she wont pay cus i said no
so she violated
But consequently if she doesnt pay shell have an eviction on her record
not I
since shes the renter and im just payin to stay til college
that makes a lot more sense if you use real life exaples
well arguments about the definition of "law" are kinda esoteric and the picture you linked makes no argument. It just says what does and doesn't count as law. But jurisprudence scholars like Hart or Dworkin would disagree on many points.
But I'm asking what the picture you linked is relevant to?
its could just be a pic he linked
sometimes puddles are just puddles
I just want to know what the picture is relevant to haha. It's a topic I'm interested in.
yeah i get ir
how old are you
late 20s
oh okay makes semse
the actual response
Whats that
He looks russian
/topic test
This place doesn't work like IRC.
/topic Nigger
_SODOMIZES THE WEAK_
this is irc for stupid people
like slack
Truly my phone is racist
Accidentally deleted pic, don't care
What is amerika up to
noiticed Amerika.org got reposted to Red Ice. nice going
controlled
Why is/was the middle east so dysgenic they literally practiced polygamy for millenia shouldnt the higher reproductive success of higher status(which supposedly are more intelligent/stronger to acquire such position) lead to a eugenic effect or am i missing something?
Polygamy is only eugenic in a warrior society
werent the muslim a warrior society?
I think what we are missing is the female side, the higher quality man have to marry downwards in terms of genetic quality
MK at the end of the day muslims and all other middle easterners are trade people
it rewards used car salesmen
so the elite used car salesman gets 20 pretty wives and gives birth to 300 used car salesbabies
eugenics is in place but only to make better liars
In the west a man had to own property before he could marry and then reproduce this lead to a good portion of men not being able to reproduce and the same was true for the female side(low quality woman cant find suitable man because their arent enough available) this seems to be more eugenic then the polygamous strategy, another andvantage is that you dont have unmarried man around that have literally nothing to loose -> incentivizes high-risk behaviour, criminality , instead they direct their efforts towards production and acquiring of capital for his family. The advantage of polygamy is that you can send a lot of those man which have no prospect of acquiring a mate towards others and say to them dont kill me and take my stuff/woman but go over there and take their stuff and woman.
We in the west invest a lot more capital in each soldier with higher production in the back
that shit is exactly what we have now dude
post 2008 life: everyone poor as shit and prolonging having kids until they can afford it
Kids arent that expensive to be honest, if you get a property and become as autark as possible in terms of food/water/weaponry/energy you can live on 100 โฌ per mont
And if you have many children they tend to entertain themselves so the work load for your wife isnt that high
autark
For weaponry learn to make booby traps to mine your property, weaponry semi-automatic/automatic and drone for reconaissance
what you say makes sense in that I see why you would believe it
the overall concept of owning land, living off of it and making all your own food, trapping it etc. reveals some wrong assumptions
all of that is illegal either outright or de facto
well than get yourself in a position in which you can produce it yourself
there is a minimum amount of societal participation that the herd demands of you by force
for example, property taxes
no matter what, you have to do enough economic activity to pay for that
you have to pay property taxes when you buy it after you bought it its yours and you dont have to pay taxes at least thats my assumption
what country are you in
because that is not true of america at least
germany
generally property taxes are recurring annual expenses here
i am not actualyl sure if this is true so you could be right here
don't know about there
society expects/demands a minimum amount from all of us
it demands property taxes or rent (paid to the guy who them pays property tax)
it expects we do not grow all our own food (illegal)
it expects we do not booby trap our property (illegal here)
It is illegal to grow your own food?
in america? yes
what i dont belive that
the laws say no, but if you try it bad things tend to happen to you
I mean it's not like you are the first person to come up with the idea, yet you don't see people doing it
they use zoning laws, "you could grow it all but only in this part of town, you live on the wrong side of some line so it's illegal"
or they will find other ways to bust you over it
join any permaculture forum and you will find examples fast
that's the thing foreigners unfortunately don't understand about this place
257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 465/1029
| Next