Message from @custer
Discord ID: 316615885928398848
IF SOMETHING IS GOOD, WHY NOT MAKE IT LEGAL?
AND IF YOU DO NOT, IT WILL BE ATTACKED USING THE LAW
your second point is really good I think
that's what's happening
THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE LAW
I PREFER RULE BY ARISTOCRATS
ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS
for example, supreme court upholding disparate impact challenges under the fair housing act
ENTIRELY
LAWYERS ARE NOT LEADERS
THEY ARE BUSINESSMEN WHO DEPEND ON A MONOPOLY
my fave super hero is a lawyer
i'm going to law school
are you blind
I'm a lawyer
spiritually blind
nice
nice
how bad does it suck
I like my job. but i'm in a specific niche I made a lot of sacrifices to get into
lawyering seems hard
and greasy
like a greasy sort of affair
did you sacrifice your soul
it's a big field. there are greasy areas and fine areas. diversity_is_racism is right about lawyers and leadership/policy. They shouldn't be making decisions.
I didn't sacrifice my soul. I'm doing exactly what I wanted to do and it's really interesting. But I know a lot of people who did.
lawyers who get paid to defend child molestors shouldn't make laws to begin with
or advocate or anything
i dunno man it seems like they take cash no matter what
why cant we just go back to public executions
like in the center of town square
leave the bodies rot in the open so ppl wont want to break laws
most lawyers defending child molesters get paid dogshit by the state as public defenders
well
i mean thats good
dont defend the shitty public ud get paid more
I and Foucault agree with you on public executions
its save us so much money and time
esp if its proven without a doubt
just takem from the court to the hangin block