Message from @diversity_is_racism
Discord ID: 316705689823346689
that makes a lot more sense if you use real life exaples
well arguments about the definition of "law" are kinda esoteric and the picture you linked makes no argument. It just says what does and doesn't count as law. But jurisprudence scholars like Hart or Dworkin would disagree on many points.
But I'm asking what the picture you linked is relevant to?
its could just be a pic he linked
sometimes puddles are just puddles
I just want to know what the picture is relevant to haha. It's a topic I'm interested in.
yeah i get ir
how old are you
late 20s
oh okay makes semse
the actual response
Whats that
He looks russian
/topic test
This place doesn't work like IRC.
/topic Nigger
this is irc for stupid people
like slack
Truly my phone is racist
Accidentally deleted pic, don't care
What is amerika up to
noiticed Amerika.org got reposted to Red Ice. nice going
controlled
Why is/was the middle east so dysgenic they literally practiced polygamy for millenia shouldnt the higher reproductive success of higher status(which supposedly are more intelligent/stronger to acquire such position) lead to a eugenic effect or am i missing something?
Polygamy is only eugenic in a warrior society
werent the muslim a warrior society?
I think what we are missing is the female side, the higher quality man have to marry downwards in terms of genetic quality
MK at the end of the day muslims and all other middle easterners are trade people
it rewards used car salesmen
so the elite used car salesman gets 20 pretty wives and gives birth to 300 used car salesbabies
eugenics is in place but only to make better liars
In the west a man had to own property before he could marry and then reproduce this lead to a good portion of men not being able to reproduce and the same was true for the female side(low quality woman cant find suitable man because their arent enough available) this seems to be more eugenic then the polygamous strategy, another andvantage is that you dont have unmarried man around that have literally nothing to loose -> incentivizes high-risk behaviour, criminality , instead they direct their efforts towards production and acquiring of capital for his family. The advantage of polygamy is that you can send a lot of those man which have no prospect of acquiring a mate towards others and say to them dont kill me and take my stuff/woman but go over there and take their stuff and woman.
We in the west invest a lot more capital in each soldier with higher production in the back
that shit is exactly what we have now dude
post 2008 life: everyone poor as shit and prolonging having kids until they can afford it
Kids arent that expensive to be honest, if you get a property and become as autark as possible in terms of food/water/weaponry/energy you can live on 100 € per mont