so the elite used car salesman gets 20 pretty wives and gives birth to 300 used car salesbabies

eugenics is in place but only to make better liars

In the west a man had to own property before he could marry and then reproduce this lead to a good portion of men not being able to reproduce and the same was true for the female side(low quality woman cant find suitable man because their arent enough available) this seems to be more eugenic then the polygamous strategy, another andvantage is that you dont have unmarried man around that have literally nothing to loose -> incentivizes high-risk behaviour, criminality , instead they direct their efforts towards production and acquiring of capital for his family. The advantage of polygamy is that you can send a lot of those man which have no prospect of acquiring a mate towards others and say to them dont kill me and take my stuff/woman but go over there and take their stuff and woman.

We in the west invest a lot more capital in each soldier with higher production in the back

that shit is exactly what we have now dude

post 2008 life: everyone poor as shit and prolonging having kids until they can afford it

Kids arent that expensive to be honest, if you get a property and become as autark as possible in terms of food/water/weaponry/energy you can live on 100 € per mont

And if you have many children they tend to entertain themselves so the work load for your wife isnt that high

autark

For weaponry learn to make booby traps to mine your property, weaponry semi-automatic/automatic and drone for reconaissance

what you say makes sense in that I see why you would believe it

the overall concept of owning land, living off of it and making all your own food, trapping it etc. reveals some wrong assumptions

all of that is illegal either outright or de facto

well than get yourself in a position in which you can produce it yourself

there is a minimum amount of societal participation that the herd demands of you by force

for example, property taxes

no matter what, you have to do enough economic activity to pay for that

you have to pay property taxes when you buy it after you bought it its yours and you dont have to pay taxes at least thats my assumption

what country are you in

because that is not true of america at least

germany

generally property taxes are recurring annual expenses here

i am not actualyl sure if this is true so you could be right here

don't know about there

society expects/demands a minimum amount from all of us

it demands property taxes or rent (paid to the guy who them pays property tax)

it expects we do not grow all our own food (illegal)

it expects we do not booby trap our property (illegal here)

It is illegal to grow your own food?

in america? yes

what i dont belive that

the laws say no, but if you try it bad things tend to happen to you

I mean it's not like you are the first person to come up with the idea, yet you don't see people doing it

they use zoning laws, "you could grow it all but only in this part of town, you live on the wrong side of some line so it's illegal"

or they will find other ways to bust you over it

join any permaculture forum and you will find examples fast

that's the thing foreigners unfortunately don't understand about this place

america likes to portray itself as this land of anarchic freedom and opportunity

europeans are generally smart enough to know that isn't exactly true, but they are often quite surprised how much is illegal here

for example, where I currently live, if I even want to change a few boards on the siding of my house, I have to hire an engineer to draw up plans of what I want to do, then present it to a city government and get it approved

on my lawn, I am allowed to grow grass and only grass, and it must be less than so many centimeters tall or I get fined