Wow couldn't post what i was going to say

@HeadlessCowboy what do you think about Matt Gaetz?

The articles were passed in 1789, and then revised in 1992. Neither time did they include the preamble, which was there at the initial passage in 1787

Do you have any evidence to suggest otherwise?

speaking of the constittuion, i made some body delete twitter the other day

during that Ted Cruz shit

Lol

Sophia, think of the algorithm the upheld/pass/pass/upheld

What ted Cruz shit

@HeadlessCowboy no, your algorithm is wrong.

It isn't

Can you answer the question?

You just don't understand it

You’re currently failing to defend your algorithm

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 22!

So obviously it’s wrong

It is hard to type so fast

So can you answer the question, yes or no?

I understand your feeble smooth brain has trouble typing out big complete sentences with your sausage fingers

with every assume you make.

But try to wipe the tears and respond like a big boy

Nah, It is right. I know it

Now you have claimed that the preamble was passed with the 14th amendment

Is that accurate? YES or NO

trump is a jew puppet

Trump isn’t president

It was, same as the previous parts otherwise we wouldn't have them today

Trump is a false flag operation to make republicans OK with a 3rd Obama term

upheld/ then pass / pass / then upheld once on the constitution

Obama is still President, no one has seen trump except for rallies, he’s just an actor

^ 5d chess

@HeadlessCowboy ok, so it’s your belief that the entire constitution is renewed every time an amendment is passed, is that correct?

It is every nano second

That’s less retarded from a jurisprudence standpoint, but still totally irrelevant

Nothing in it says it is to last forever - just passed

Ted Cruz quoted two people that were not at the COnstitutional Convention to respond to Mayo Pete's statement about "The writers of the Constitution"

Ok, so we’ve concluded after this long debate that laws currently in effect of current

And that other laws are not

ted cruz is a cuck

Is this your grand discovery?

Ted Cruz is a cuck

There is more to it @Deleted User You have much to learn young grass hopper

Wow, really old reference

lol

Did they just get that movie in your country?

@HeadlessCowboy can you just tell us what your first language is?

No hate, we are just curious

Yeah, why is this such an issue

Latin 😉 just kidding English, probably took spanish too soon

Isn’t it better to be a non-native speaker than to have us think you’re just retarded?

trump is a moron and a puppet, the left is also

GG @Fire, you just advanced to level 1!

Like honestly, your English is bad. Really really bad.

It’s absolutely nothing to be ashamed about if it’s not your first language

Hey @Fire How was law school? Have fun with this old thing:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Jny0CZ9knlAtdq6-ZZpgxFRJ_I5ervaq

GG @HeadlessCowboy, you just advanced to level 12!

It's a weird lie, like Trump and his father's birthplace

Trump is what everyone was aspiring to have. Someone more stupid than the average American voter.

He got a million dollar loan.

@HeadlessCowboy what does that suppose to mean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRKwwk7CXBQ

@Fire Remember someone a long time ago? Or are you someone else not from the minecraft forums

```If you say “oranges” instead of “origins” once, it’s a slip of the tongue. But when you do it three times in a row, it’s dementia.

```

Lol

i dont remember being a minecraft brainlet

Yeah, trump’s actual mental acuity is an interesting thing

I think liberals probably have more compassion

A flaw

If it happened to Obama they’d say “that poor man, someone get him some help”

100% winning 2020

Do you remember Mathematics with Words using Codes? - funny name.

@Fire

But with trump, they just say “nuh uh he’s a stable genius libtards”

Obama can have decent moments though and actually be human.

I liked Obama Care 😉

Remember, every conservative has had at least 3 smirinoff ices before you talk to them

Trump is responsible for the largest US economic growth since 1960

Partly ^

Trump loves to troll everyone.

^obama’s and Clinton’s were both significantly greater

And Obama is responsible for the only economic downturn since World War 2

Lol

see trend. see Trump

Got to squint hard to see that

Unemployment is down

i use Black unemployment there since they love that one

Poverty is at record lows.

Yeah

It isn't going to last though

Yea it is

Why not?

No, it isn't. There is a bubble

Here is a fun one though

All depends on the economist you ask.

black unemplyoment dropped cause they all shot 😂

ouch

@Sh0t what is that for?

Unemployment stats are a game to govts though.

True

It isn't the real number

it's real enough

Democrats or Republicans

the second graph is a graph of multiple job holders

It is a real number but admins can manipulate it.

key takeaway: look at the trend in the chart, and when Trump comes in

7 years of trend, then trump, continuation

The only thing I hate about trump is he only cares about economy

He is willing to destroy a national park in Minnesota just for Copper

only thing i hate about trump is that hes just another jewish puppet

Though the stats fall down when you take into account these are likely min wage jobs.

And those folks might be on food stamps and assistance programs.

that data is available

New Jersey minimum wage went up because of trump

$10

Economy rolling under trump!

Now its $11

And so do prices. 😜

Nope.

In 2021 they will go up

here is a fun one:

For now more money less prices

Dems are rolling in their sleep over trumps supreme intelligence in office.

Here is another fun one for Trumpers to defend:

Quantity over quality.

all that talk about manufacturing, but hours are down

Is anyone here below 18?

Quick question

Cuz I'm 12

The young people are upstairs in <#542037236053442561>

Well, robotics is kinda the deaths door for old school manufacturing. You will always need to employ technicians and cleaning staff though to pop in and take care of the machines though.

Doesn't have to be at all

Until they invent an ultimate roomba.

The automation thing is a big myth too

i.e., Yang et al

The unemployment is a function of unspent income from the productivity gains

for any era or sector

the labor shift is an externality that only the gov can really solve within any reasonable time frame, basic fiscal action to retrain people or repurpose them

many conservatives and libertarians hold the idea that free market economy 'rations scarce resources', but it doesn't. it efficiently produces wealth, which is very different

The gov also gets in the way when they bailout dinosaurs like the automakers, etc. those factories could have been sold off to 30ish different companies and turned it other things by now, including maybe a dozen or more car companies

You might agree/disagree but not bailing out homeowners till it was far too late was the worse sin. It created a big personal debt trap and made large numbers homeless.

I generally think the govt needs to do way more to deal with home ownership, especially in CA.

I would have done something comprehensive about the banks and the housing situation in general

I would not have reinflated the housing bubble, would have let all the bad bets play out, including the foreclosuers and then auctions, done something else with the mortgage holders

put on gov balance sheet with their payments wrapped up in taxes

CA seems like it is over regulated and bars high rise developments to artificially maintain property values.

that moral hazard regarding big home buying is not something gov should encourage though

not all of CA, but some parts yea. I was in CA at the time

i did opposite and bought a cheap place counter cycle

i watched friends ride the condo frenzy in socal

i made about a mil shorting financials

The irony now though is all those homeless camps and folks sleeping in cars, and toilet waste on the streets, also lowers property values. Neater to just have affordable property.

In some cities in Cali, the issue is definitely building out instead of up, partially to avoid having to do any public transit. especially in san diego which had the perfect weather for a walkable area

yea I think fedgov + states should just do a pop capped homeless building project, with transit to connect them to hubs if NIMBYs complain

I priced it out using military style numbers, it's pretty cheap

San Fran in particular is poorly laid out and has a big lack of public toilets, which promotes gross waste on the streets.

San fran and the bay area have some of those green space laws that purposefully restrict supply

San Jose I think is culprit #1

I was just visting San Fran, and the only toilet I could find in a major metro area was in the back of a clothing store.

So homeless are barred entry of course.

something more tough lovely is just moving the homeless to cheaper areas like Arkansas

if it's a federal issue

I also think the fed should take a lot of muni debt on its balance sheet instead of private bets

like the complaining about California is silly when it pays so much federal tax and some states pay none

```something more tough lovely is just moving the homeless to cheaper areas like Arkansas``` That doesn't work, as they were born in the state and have family connections often. They end up just coming back.

CA was at one point suggesting something akin to a Star Trek episode. xD

shut up you're literally black

Forced detention camps for the homeless.

We can make it work, they can be housed and have a much better QoL in lower cost areas. same goes for a lot of welfare spending

we pay people to live in expensive areas, it's silly

Trump is being impeached

close channel

No, he is impeached

Gobus clearly doesn't understand the American Government.

https://youtu.be/OPeKOQzheOw

Nice try democrats you all fail he is not Impeach

This is definitely gonna be repeated for a while, isn't it?

Yep

Yeah, well, it's still untrue.

Just wait till 2020 when they try to impeach him again

But he was successfully impeached.

There's a trial coming up.

Yes but there’s no evidence on anything he’s ever done he’s never did nothing wrong there is no evidence

I’m pretty sure they’re going to dismiss it when it happens

No evidence means no trial

*

They do this everytime.

They stall with all these accusations back up with, *nothing*.

Waste of breath, they shouldn’t be given a voice for any future impeachments.

They actually have to denounce their own party by taking the senate oath xD

Turns out there's just one thing you need to know - Trump said, "Do us a favor, though..."

🎵

The timeline of the aid's release is even more interesting.

But it surely is nothing for Trump's fanbase.

Longer you wait for evidence to come out, the more likely it is forged. The dems clearly went about that wrong.

Do us a favor. Not do me a favor

Plus I don't think that qualifies as impeachable. When Biden said in a conference while he was gloating how he influenced the Ukranians to fire the investigator that was looking into a company that Biden's Son Hunter was on as a board of directors.

Alot of the times I feel is that Democrats accuse the Republicans of offenses they themselves commit.

Yeah the call itself definitely isn't the strongest evidence (though I'd argue it's enough). But it's the only part simple enough for some of the smarter Republicans to grasp and maybe start to put two and two together.

So we're going after Biden as well

I was also referencing a Colbert bit - he has a jingle that goes that way

Right?

Well whatever "we" is, obviously is

Actual law enforcement agencies are not because there's no evidence

<:honk:583238347124637707>

You are brainwashed

Why the democrats are only going to lose the moderate democrats that won the house in 2018

Impeachment was more or less who supports the party

I mean I prefer ranting about Radical democrats than some Religious Republicans. More interesting

impeachment is going to become the new thing

I'm telling you

Our next 10 presidents are gonna be impeached but not removed

https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1212854924108816385

Pelosi is going to end up President at this rate

This is coming from Adam Schiff

Are you really quoting Adam Schiff

<:peepodumb:538083903835996176>

You have got to be kidding..

President Pelosi?

That's a good joke.

What about his statement do you have issue with?

Let's look at some of the major points.
> We subpoenaed them
That's true.
> and they refused.
Also true.
> Now we know why.
Speculation, but reasonable considering the content

He states in that tweet "A fair Senate trial...."

that says enough

says enough what

That they should not have impeached Trump to begin with??

If they didnt have all the evidence

What about the parts I quoted there

Why did they impeach him in the house

If they didnt have enough evidence

That's where Impeachments happen

They had evidence; they wanted more.

Then they should have waited to impeach

not to remove

It's proof that they have it out for him

Why, they moved ahead with what they had, which was bad enough

but more evidence is always better

They sub'ed for it, Trump ordered his people not to send over anything and/or testify

aka obstruction

No

You want them to wait for evidence Trump obstructed access to

If you are going to impeach someone

and you "Don't have all the documents"

Then you shouldnt impeach

until you "Have all the documents"

You are making shit excuses for these corrupt people

Your logic is saying they should wait for the criminal to send over evidence of guilt

> Then they should have waited to impeach

They subpoened for it, the White HOuse obstructed