Are you really quoting Adam Schiff

<:peepodumb:538083903835996176>

You have got to be kidding..

President Pelosi?

That's a good joke.

What about his statement do you have issue with?

Let's look at some of the major points.
> We subpoenaed them
That's true.
> and they refused.
Also true.
> Now we know why.
Speculation, but reasonable considering the content

He states in that tweet "A fair Senate trial...."

that says enough

says enough what

That they should not have impeached Trump to begin with??

If they didnt have all the evidence

What about the parts I quoted there

Why did they impeach him in the house

If they didnt have enough evidence

That's where Impeachments happen

They had evidence; they wanted more.

Then they should have waited to impeach

not to remove

It's proof that they have it out for him

Why, they moved ahead with what they had, which was bad enough

but more evidence is always better

They sub'ed for it, Trump ordered his people not to send over anything and/or testify

aka obstruction

No

You want them to wait for evidence Trump obstructed access to

If you are going to impeach someone

and you "Don't have all the documents"

Then you shouldnt impeach

until you "Have all the documents"

You are making shit excuses for these corrupt people

Your logic is saying they should wait for the criminal to send over evidence of guilt

> Then they should have waited to impeach

They subpoened for it, the White HOuse obstructed

They had testimonies

"Testimonies"

Correct, hours of them

Shut up cuck nazi scum

I watched about 80% of it for the lulz

Like the multitude of confessions about Trump's "Rape Accusations"

No scare quotes needed. They were testimonies