says enough what

That they should not have impeached Trump to begin with??

If they didnt have all the evidence

What about the parts I quoted there

Why did they impeach him in the house

If they didnt have enough evidence

That's where Impeachments happen

They had evidence; they wanted more.

Then they should have waited to impeach

not to remove

It's proof that they have it out for him

Why, they moved ahead with what they had, which was bad enough

but more evidence is always better

They sub'ed for it, Trump ordered his people not to send over anything and/or testify

aka obstruction

No

You want them to wait for evidence Trump obstructed access to

If you are going to impeach someone

and you "Don't have all the documents"

Then you shouldnt impeach

until you "Have all the documents"

You are making shit excuses for these corrupt people

Your logic is saying they should wait for the criminal to send over evidence of guilt

> Then they should have waited to impeach

They subpoened for it, the White HOuse obstructed

They had testimonies

"Testimonies"

Correct, hours of them

Shut up cuck nazi scum

I watched about 80% of it for the lulz

Like the multitude of confessions about Trump's "Rape Accusations"

No scare quotes needed. They were testimonies

The Dems aren't going to impeach Trump

@Solicitor claiming that some people are corrupt is fucking false as shit. Trump broke the mold cry me a river.

I didn't watch any of that, but these were under oath and a multitude of witnesses and some documents

these emails show that the witnesses were telling the truth

hence Schiff's tweet

your suggestion is circular. you want to wait for somebody obstructing to not obstruct before proceeding

Multiple of those Rape accusations were under oath too

Do you not see it

I dunno about that, I wasn't paying attention