The more offensive the better

you should've replied to it then

here

Nice

i entered a right wing discord server a few days ago, and someone was arguing for feudalism

really aesthetic

.....

Diablo

Do you think are strong enough?

?

*women

For what?

For battle or?

for what?

For guys

Thats what I just asked

Oh no

obviously not

So you think we shouldn't reproduce?

are women strong enough for guys is what you're asking? or compared to guys

Lifes biggest questions

For guys

Like do you think they can kill all the men?

Oh then yeah

No

we would have no life without reproduction

Not all

Some sure

@Diablo Prove it

Mr.E

How absurd

He knows what he is talking about

what a foolish claim

You shut your pie hole.

Sorry mom

I will

Because WOmen need sperm

TO actually have a kid

Doubt

THey do!

Prove it

YOU don't know!

Im a skeptic

Citation needed

You prove it!

Show me if

prove that they don;t need sperm then, Mr. E

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/scientists-claim-can-create-babies-7441572

....

Im fucking done

wtf

"mirror.co.uk"

the mirror is full of shit

transhumanism at its finest

If you kill all the scientist

They can't do it

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/18095147/ns/health-cloning_and_stem_cells/t/scientists-create-synthetic-sperm-cells/

Okay.

Maybe they can.

But maybe

They would be deform

Or something

Or this would be unethically.

If you kill all men you can still get pregnant by donor sperm

that doesnt prove that you dont need sperm for babies

it only proves you dont need men

Well there's not point in having sex anymore.

Yeah but still we can make it so we dont need sperm in the future

By cloning

and you need the cells for MALE BONES

See?

I can make all my arguments good even if its retarded

so wait what would happen if you had children with sperm cloned from yourself

lol

@Zero Two is back Thats why Im a virgin

So I can let robots impregnate women while I watch

@DA GOMMIE JOO#7269 then wtf

would the baby just be another you?

lol

who cares

Stop

omg I do say stop lol

what if we foound marx's sperm cell and cloned it

now everyone is marx

I wish

yes
everyone must be a descendant of marx

I wish there was a planet full of marx

Then commuism would happen again!

but they were under a capitalist system

so they were all pissed off

like the leader of the society is just me

then just clone adam smith's spirm if you want capitalism

*sperm

Why not adam sandler?

then everyone be unfunny

what would you do if 100 million adam sandlers wanted to have sex with you?

not laugh

Like you wake up one day, go outside to pick up the newspaper and see millions of adams with their dicks out checking you out?

run

That's a hell of a wet dream

and im a male and thats kinda gay

What about 1000 pornstars chasing after you.

Im too tired for this shit

@Zero Two is back fricking shoot myself

Ooh damn I said the word my mom says I cant say

Im so cool 😎

and edgy

E.

You wish.

Mr. Edgy

Mr Diablo

I need your Id.

So your not a Immigrant.

Im edgy and an emo

no

From Mexico.

Yes

Mexicans get out

reeeeeeee

im amurigan

Who did you vote for then?

Obama or trump?

i cant vote lol

im 15

Ah okay then you must be a mexican then

if you cant vote

lol

and who WOULD i vote for

idk

maybe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uccE4-GNVTM

lol

Idk how I feel about this tbh

but honestly

I support it

fuck it dude

It's horrible that the youth is suffering so much and having so much mental health issues

it's absolutely tragic and sad

Jordan peterson is really good for a lot of people with mental health issues

Highly recommend listening to him and reading his books

Faces of /pol/

@Diablo >Communists for trump

????!!!!!!

Why?

**MY EYES**

Oh Lord that flag

I’m now Hellen Keller

Lol

@Erika.ϟϟ🇮🇪 I think something is going over your head.

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Don't you love the alt-right?

No I don't support pure evil

They're my reference point for what not to do

So who do you support?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left

@koifish I'm far left in every sense of the word

except on a few things

Why’s that?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left ^^^

@koifish Out of respect for all people deserving to have the best opportunity to make most of their lives, to shake off the constants that have plagued human existence for so long, sometimes out of necessity, more often than not, however, out of mere spite, or ignorance.

I remember one time having an argument with someone about a particular policy. I can't quite remember what policy it was, maybe one payer health care or college for all. The only argument I could come up with was that the policy was socialism an affront to American ideas blah blah blah, they asked me what was wrong with it being socialist. I couldn't come up with an answer because I didn't know what socialism was.

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left It was sarcasm.

oh k

Well now that you know what it is, do you think single payer healthcare is socialism?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left

@koifish No

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left what’s the substantive difference between the government owning the means of production and the government redistributing profits gained by businesses using the means of production?

@koifish Taxation is nothing more than what the Capitalist class have to pay for the upkeep of society or the burden of it at the least e.g. government, social security, health funds, maintenance of roads etc.Although the working class are taxed as Marx pointed out workers are paid to their level of subsistence so the effect of taxation is negligible, whereas the wealthy spend vast sums on accountants to avoid paying.
Socialism on the other hand wouldn't have taxation as it is a moneyless system of society, all production will be for use as opposed to profit, no buying and selling or exchange

How's your day today comrade?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left but there’s a difference between taxation out of necessity and massive totalitarian redistribution of wealth. We’ve distanced ourselves so far from limited government over the past century. If you’re working hard every day, why should you give a third or more of your income away so some illegal alien can get a federally funded public health plan in California?

And p well

@koifish there is no communist rule that all workers be paid the same thing. The theoretical principle at work is "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" or, rather, the idea that all people ought to contribute to society as best as they are able, and in return society will provide for them as best it can

Why would you be opposed to being paid for what you deserve ?

@koifish Good to hear you're doing well comrade

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left So what is the equivalent of taxation in the commune then?

Forced labor?

@Deleted User I support very high taxation on the rich, and feel that taxation on the poor should be reduced to the absolute minimum required after this to maintain public services for the time being whilst they are forced to operate within a cappie society.

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Wait what? Didn't you say that you were against taxation as a whole? And if you just tax the wealthy, aren't you allowing for hierarchy to exist?

Sounds like a very socdem thing.

Oh

In a communist society?

Yes....

There would be no money, so there wouldn't be taxes. Communism is moneyless.

Then why did every communist country have money in that case?

Because they forgot the internationalist part of communism and couldn't establish a communist state as they were surrounded by capitalism

But the soviet union and china were very internationalist during the cold war, and made every attempt possible to spread communism.

May I remind you of vietnam, korea, afghanistan, cuba, africa, india, and greece?

USSR was isolationist for too long Stalin failed us

Trotsky would've likely handled the revolutions in Spain and elsewhere completely differently.

Stalin helped the republicans in spain too though.

Infact the only differentiating thing from stalin and the cold war politics of the USSR, was that stalin rarely funded uprisings, and rarely invaded to spread communism.

Would it not have been the case that with Trotsky's policy of the united front the different left wing factions could have allied to defeat the fascists during the Spanish civil war? From what I understand the infighting, caused by Stalin, was perhaps the largest cause of failure.

In numerous cases other than spain as well

I really hate to point fingers but that's the truth

And in reality, trotksy probably would have caused the union to collapse, due to his fanaticism that blinded him, and the probability that he would not have been able to solve the utter fucking mess that was the soviet political system that was tearing the country apart.
It is unlikely that trotsky could have won the spanish civil war, because the republicans, anarchists, and other factions hated each other, and it infamously led to the republicans disarming other groups and using their weapons for their cause, unless trotsky intervined directly, the civil war would have still been won by the fascists, and if he did intervene directly, then I doubt that hitler, or the league would have allowed it.

>US and USSR remain allies after WWII

>purge, killings never happen

.US sees no reason to see communism or socialism as evil; this plus the extra money available from the cold war never happening could have pushed the US to the left (but probably not to become communist any time within the 20th century)

>USSR still pushes to spread communism, but it is a very different communism from what we see in "communist" countries in our timeline and the US sees no reason to intervene at this time, allowing it to spread more freely without intervention from any major powers

-USSR caves into pressure to have a more democratic multiparty state, but does not dissolve the USSR

-The US and USSR are both better off fiscally, again since the spending on the cold war never happened

Lmao

Trotsky would've been worse than that paranoid psychopath I'm sure

Mhm

I completely agree Staln's purges were very good for communist PR

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left What? If WW2 started, it probably would have been because of trotsky and his attempts to spread communism, that would lead to the league or hitler responding violently, causing the USSR to be invaded, speculate how you will about how that would have gone down, but regardless, even if the exact same events happened, it is likely that the cold war would have still happened, there would be no way that the US would ever see marxism as a good thing, and would do anything to stop it.

Even if the soviet Union did collapse under Trotsky we would still be better fucking off today

How would you know?

@Deleted User I don't see your point Nazis would've still lost

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left How would you know?

@Deleted User the USSR would have gained strong allies and perhaps WW2 would have been shorter.

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Again, how would you know?

@Deleted User From most of the sources I have read, Stalin was an absolutely awful military leader. He attempted to make every single major military go through him, but when the Nazi's invaded he barricaded himself away for over a week, leaving the army commanders unable to respond to the invasion in any organised fashion. On the other hand Trotsky was extremely competent and had considerable experience, having founded and commanded the Red Army during the Great Revolutionary War.

Relax ladies, you're both equal

Equally retarded

Also the best of the soviet military wouldn't of been purged under trotsky

Stalin left the USSR's military in a shit-tier state after purging it's best and brightest

Go away fake Mr.E

??? fake mr.e

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Anx shat sources are those?

And if the military wasn't purged, when woulden't he more likely that they would have betrayed the union?

ure mom cD

x

@Deleted User What's with your creepy obession with Stalin?

Are you nazbol or something?

he gay 4 him

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Do not diverge, stay on topic.

@Deleted User Have a look at Robert Services books he's one of the many historians who agree with me

You love Stalin long time?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left So are you not able to back your own claims then? You just act like any other person and just screech "LOOK IT UP! IT ISN'T BECAUSE I CAN'T BACK MY CLAIMS, BUT IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE JUST IGNORTANT!"?

I don't know what you mean exactly

Care to explain why you love stalin so much?

Fiegning ignorance I see....

@Mr. X @Mr. X @Mr. X @Mr. X

I'm waiting

I've answered your questions this entire time

@Mr. X

@buyXRBpls Go onto the third postion server he's probably embarassing himself right now

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left I’m not against people being paid what they deserve, but I’m for people being paid what they agree to in a free and civilized society which is what happens in the United States

I refuse to go there

@koifish and what would you do if you didn't have to earn money to please your capitalist master for survival comrade?

That's not what happens in the US

Teachers are barely surviving of their pay in several states

Why would you even be a teacher?

It's like putting bomb on your chest.

Here at least

What if you didn't have to be a lab rat?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Nobody has to earn money or work, the government doesn’t force them. But that’s kind of beside the point. The beauty of capitalism when the government is fair is that anyone can rise to be extraordinarily wealthy which happens all the time. It’s what happens when a system is customer oriented instead of worker oriented

I encourage you to denounce your profit/capitalist way of looking at the world comrade

Fourth.