the search for more and more profit is the problem

The final stage of communism is stateless.

it creates a vicious cycle of exploitation whether here or overseas, destruction of environment and bodies

How does communism exist without the state

so you have some Countries that are overpopulated because of their own mismanagement and what it is everyone elses burden to look after them and share resources with them ?

the very definition of communism is the withering away of the state as marx and engels say, the interim before that goal is the dictatorship of the proletariat which granted led to disaster

Marx never worked a day in his life and looked down on negroes

But how does it exist without the state

a Dictator

Who redistributes

@gronkt Marx worked plenty, intellectual labour is very difficult

we have seen how it goes down many times already

and he got paid peanuts for it, his legacy is huge and writings are pure genius

Who redistributes? -.-

it is idealistic and can never work

the power of the people is all

Ok

I see

people are greedy selfish lazy animals

they are corruptable

happens every time

one can say that america in its early phases was one of the most successful communes since everything was decided by councils

that was before big government and the civil war

They do work until they get attacked...

lol

America was ancap

no it wasnt ancap because capitalist was in its early phases

Built on self starters

there is nothin wrong with self starters, but having an advantage like the americans or australians where your given land is not really ancap, that is communism

If you're sharing stuff with your family it's not communism

Which was all America back then

yes but if you also share with community it is

bartering local trade

Most communities back then were related to each other

decentralised everything is communism

so it is possible for a nation but not for the whole planet

then it becomes the NWO

i think federalisation within nations and maintain trade on a planetary scale idealistic but possible

It's possible

yes i agree i hate th idea of any nwo world governemnt

But retarded

hahah perhaps time will tell

Why would you want the world's economies tied together?

trade is necessary for a good life

why should one Country that worked it arse of mining resources just share them with another Country that has nothing and did no work to better themselves ?

plus all knowledge and technical advancement relies on sharing, localism is anathema to knowledge growth

Hmm

youre talking about a national spirit, as though the collective owns anything

There's really only one kind of national spirit and that's ethnic

i dont sacrifice myself for my country, in fact, i dont want the ideology of sacrifice for anyone or anything, that is for me to decide

Then can you say you're truly living for anything?

wel the people of that Nation should share in the profits of the resources of that Country which is where socialism comes in

access to health and education

i can take on any philosopht, epicurean, stoic, buddhist, christian, yes i can sacrifice to realise my spiritual potential, or artistic potential etc

but i will not sacrifice for some imagines nation

culture and tradition is important but all the greatest individual growth will also come from antagomism with it

Why do you say that

look at Sweden now, they should not be burdened with the people of Africa and the Middle East to the point that they lose their own culture

Are you orthodox @gronkt

it is a form of genocide

no I am Agnostic

i can see the merit of this argument, but this Malthus not Marx. Population growth and expansion is a problem of global capital as well, not ideology

It is how colonization begins

Someone doesn't like white people and they're looking for ways to destroy them.

Not sure who it is

and in fact, capital which wants profit from war has created untold numbers of refugees. make the poor countries rich and no one will want to leave

But it's pretty obvious

africa can be developed, and the west has to help fast otherwise more shit will hit the fan

If Africa is shit without intervention it should stay shit

No one needs to help them

Or should feel compelled to

thats not feasible because their shit already is your shit

Isn't a lot of the conflict in Africa due to how poorly drawn the borders are?

Which was due to imperialism

the world already is a global world

Nah

Goes back to Cecil B Rhodes who was funded by the Rothschilds

same cunts doing the Globalism now

africa had a chance with a state socialism style system in the 60s and 70s--it could have worked to bring them up to speed with western capitalism, but cia and other imperialists did not let history play out

cia are henchmen of the globalists

neocolonialism is a sadder history than colonialism, so many things go wrong with a too rapid development

nato UN

all the same shit

Countries should just leave eachother alone.

UN has some good points but there is a danger it could become the spokeman of global capital in the future, so i cant trust its motives either

Rothschilds funded Bolsheviks to cripple Russia

How? Russia became a world superpower

it is all a game to these people and communism and capitalism are just different tools they use for the same agenda

i think people exaggerate the role money played in the russian revolution

it was because the Tzar rejected a Central bank

you seem to have a cabal view of history--i think the cabal view obscures the deeper systemic nature of the disease, which is the profit motive

Are you talking about (((them)))?

facts are facts, all of this is documented

Antony Sutton has lots of books and videos on this

it is documented but unless mainstream history accepts it it is conspiracy theory

Ruling families of Europe

history is a vexed way to approach politics anyway since facts are not facts but interpretations--always

well it is dismissed as conspiracy but Antony Sutton is a respected researcher that worked for the government

not some alex jones, icke nonsense

david icke hahaha that guy is literally on another planet