Most communities back then were related to each other

decentralised everything is communism

so it is possible for a nation but not for the whole planet

then it becomes the NWO

i think federalisation within nations and maintain trade on a planetary scale idealistic but possible

It's possible

yes i agree i hate th idea of any nwo world governemnt

But retarded

hahah perhaps time will tell

Why would you want the world's economies tied together?

trade is necessary for a good life

why should one Country that worked it arse of mining resources just share them with another Country that has nothing and did no work to better themselves ?

plus all knowledge and technical advancement relies on sharing, localism is anathema to knowledge growth

Hmm

youre talking about a national spirit, as though the collective owns anything

There's really only one kind of national spirit and that's ethnic

i dont sacrifice myself for my country, in fact, i dont want the ideology of sacrifice for anyone or anything, that is for me to decide

Then can you say you're truly living for anything?

wel the people of that Nation should share in the profits of the resources of that Country which is where socialism comes in

access to health and education

i can take on any philosopht, epicurean, stoic, buddhist, christian, yes i can sacrifice to realise my spiritual potential, or artistic potential etc

but i will not sacrifice for some imagines nation

culture and tradition is important but all the greatest individual growth will also come from antagomism with it

Why do you say that

look at Sweden now, they should not be burdened with the people of Africa and the Middle East to the point that they lose their own culture

Are you orthodox @gronkt

it is a form of genocide

no I am Agnostic

i can see the merit of this argument, but this Malthus not Marx. Population growth and expansion is a problem of global capital as well, not ideology

It is how colonization begins

Someone doesn't like white people and they're looking for ways to destroy them.

Not sure who it is

and in fact, capital which wants profit from war has created untold numbers of refugees. make the poor countries rich and no one will want to leave

But it's pretty obvious

africa can be developed, and the west has to help fast otherwise more shit will hit the fan

If Africa is shit without intervention it should stay shit

No one needs to help them

Or should feel compelled to

thats not feasible because their shit already is your shit

Isn't a lot of the conflict in Africa due to how poorly drawn the borders are?

Which was due to imperialism