Why do you say that

look at Sweden now, they should not be burdened with the people of Africa and the Middle East to the point that they lose their own culture

Are you orthodox @gronkt

it is a form of genocide

no I am Agnostic

i can see the merit of this argument, but this Malthus not Marx. Population growth and expansion is a problem of global capital as well, not ideology

It is how colonization begins

Someone doesn't like white people and they're looking for ways to destroy them.

Not sure who it is

and in fact, capital which wants profit from war has created untold numbers of refugees. make the poor countries rich and no one will want to leave

But it's pretty obvious

africa can be developed, and the west has to help fast otherwise more shit will hit the fan

If Africa is shit without intervention it should stay shit

No one needs to help them

Or should feel compelled to

thats not feasible because their shit already is your shit

Isn't a lot of the conflict in Africa due to how poorly drawn the borders are?

Which was due to imperialism

the world already is a global world

Nah

Goes back to Cecil B Rhodes who was funded by the Rothschilds

same cunts doing the Globalism now

africa had a chance with a state socialism style system in the 60s and 70s--it could have worked to bring them up to speed with western capitalism, but cia and other imperialists did not let history play out

cia are henchmen of the globalists

neocolonialism is a sadder history than colonialism, so many things go wrong with a too rapid development

nato UN

all the same shit

Countries should just leave eachother alone.

UN has some good points but there is a danger it could become the spokeman of global capital in the future, so i cant trust its motives either

Rothschilds funded Bolsheviks to cripple Russia

How? Russia became a world superpower

it is all a game to these people and communism and capitalism are just different tools they use for the same agenda

i think people exaggerate the role money played in the russian revolution

it was because the Tzar rejected a Central bank

you seem to have a cabal view of history--i think the cabal view obscures the deeper systemic nature of the disease, which is the profit motive

Are you talking about (((them)))?

facts are facts, all of this is documented

Antony Sutton has lots of books and videos on this

it is documented but unless mainstream history accepts it it is conspiracy theory

Ruling families of Europe

history is a vexed way to approach politics anyway since facts are not facts but interpretations--always