general
Discord ID: 634367565304561675
1,011,369 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 146/10114
| Next
Weaboo degrades to greater depths of retardation every single day
<:droolingtard:494478974446207002> me rn after reading chat
he gud boi
Weaboo is too big brained
For you
its clear that you let a jew convince you that prohibition of something increases its consumption
you got jewed
dude
lets go through what would happen
if we just legalized
man
Read the book lmao
first you open the gates, then people vote your money
somehow profit
Again, I am describing what has happened in my country with the liberalisation of our drug laws
"buuut muh numbers! They're irrefutable!"
your solution to this incrased chaos is what?
21% of my country's population is now addicted to some substance
just more freedom, these random monkeys no longe rhave the law
This since the laws have begun liberalising
Not even joking with that number
@Banjod People who haven't read Libertarian theory have a dramatic misunderstanding of Libertarianism.
I have
I just am not a retard
You clearly haven't if that's how you think it would work.
it is
Yes, it's idealistic as fuck
Probably not gonna happen
NRx is a more practical ideaolgy.
so whyu talk abou tit
what's the point
Libertarianism is judaic empowerment for grug-tier goyim
Because its my ideal.
ancapism is against human nature
peopel don't want to work for things
Why discuss politics at all then?
they want it now
without anything for it
What is the point of an unachievable ideal?
you discuss politics for what can be done
not what is a fantasy that will never happen
the point is not dying fuast
you'ยจre not writing a fantasy novel
The modern democratic state will probably collapse anyway
"read a book which I haven't actually read which I think ***might*** disagree with historical statistics about a prohibition event using purely ideological reasoning"
the point of politics is to partake in achievable methods of human organization that are actually practical
@Nerthulas How would you know? You haven't read it.
no, you explain to me why prohibition of something will increase its consumption
And yes, your data is trash. Accept it.
we're not in politics you junkie
you don't even know, and you're using it to make an argument
His data is accurate
politics is a means
You not liking it doesn't determine it's accuracy
that was ***one*** study
Name some good anime I haven't seen
conceptually, its not even possible that it could not be reduced
its stops being a means the second it is no longer a tool for us
second of all
@TheUserNameofPeace Black Clover, assuming you are okay with some childishness
we have other cases than american prohibition of alcohol
countless
I'll check it out @Fรฉnius Farsaid
@Leaf Okay, prove it.
You may or may not like it
It is hit or miss
particularly the one we've been talking about, Russia's 42% decrease in consumption
i'll say this agian, he will just refuse it until you convince him emotionally
Ok one seond
this position is not a logical one
second
it's an emotion
feels over reals
you can ltiearlly see it, no matter what you say, he'll just keep saying "but I want x"
conceptually, its not even ***possible*** that it does not decrease, or increases consumption
its impossible completely
the book you're talking about probably does not even make that argument
"Research conducted by the Ministry of Health regarding the consumption of tobacco influenced both public education and state policy; in reflection of the discoveries of the administration's health department, considerable measures were taken to curtail the consumption of tobacco. These measures included prohibitions on the sale of tobacco to minors, of smoking in public areas and within the armed forces, restrictions on the advertisement of tobacco products. Additionally, several tobacco advertising and manufacturing companies were forcibly closed by the state. These measures, while successful in some regards, were limited in their effeciacy by the Second World War. Nonetheless, the daily tobacco intake of the average serviceman was reduced by 25% and prohibitions on smoking in public were effective in eliminating the consumption of tobacco among a majority of minors." @Weaboo Kempeitai
but makes other ones
I cannot speak for @Weaboo Kempeitai, but when I was an ancap my position(s) was not dictated by emotion, but by a priori reasoning. This is the case with almost every libertarian. It's philosophical for them, not practical.
ancaps endorse lying
its loyalty to ideology is what it is
I'm fairly sure this is true
that they just endorse it
@Leaf We're talking about alcohol tho
@TheUserNameofPeace
Shinsekai yori is breddy cool
No, we're talking about prohibition
It's loyalty to a philosophical principle.
@Banjod lmao
@Roko cool
I mean
imagine being loyal to fucking idea what a joke
Most AnCaps don't read theory
So, that's fair.
don't take his freedom of lying away
Most ancaps don't read
Yes
True
first of all, its conceptually impossible that it didn't
@Banjod stfu you accuse everyone of lying lmao
1,011,369 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 146/10114
| Next