Message from @Banjod

Discord ID: 634933555298041867


2019-10-19 01:57:39 UTC  

conceptually, its not even ***possible*** that it does not decrease, or increases consumption

2019-10-19 01:57:43 UTC  

its impossible completely

2019-10-19 01:57:56 UTC  

the book you're talking about probably does not even make that argument

2019-10-19 01:57:59 UTC  

"Research conducted by the Ministry of Health regarding the consumption of tobacco influenced both public education and state policy; in reflection of the discoveries of the administration's health department, considerable measures were taken to curtail the consumption of tobacco. These measures included prohibitions on the sale of tobacco to minors, of smoking in public areas and within the armed forces, restrictions on the advertisement of tobacco products. Additionally, several tobacco advertising and manufacturing companies were forcibly closed by the state. These measures, while successful in some regards, were limited in their effeciacy by the Second World War. Nonetheless, the daily tobacco intake of the average serviceman was reduced by 25% and prohibitions on smoking in public were effective in eliminating the consumption of tobacco among a majority of minors." @Weaboo Kempeitai

2019-10-19 01:57:59 UTC  

but makes other ones

2019-10-19 01:58:00 UTC  

I cannot speak for @Weaboo Kempeitai, but when I was an ancap my position(s) was not dictated by emotion, but by a priori reasoning. This is the case with almost every libertarian. It's philosophical for them, not practical.

2019-10-19 01:58:28 UTC  

ancaps endorse lying

2019-10-19 01:58:31 UTC  

its loyalty to ideology is what it is

2019-10-19 01:58:39 UTC  

I'm fairly sure this is true

2019-10-19 01:58:44 UTC  

that they just endorse it

2019-10-19 01:58:44 UTC  

@Leaf We're talking about alcohol tho

2019-10-19 01:58:47 UTC  

@TheUserNameofPeace
Shinsekai yori is breddy cool

2019-10-19 01:58:52 UTC  

No, we're talking about prohibition

2019-10-19 01:58:52 UTC  

It's loyalty to a philosophical principle.

2019-10-19 01:58:57 UTC  

@Banjod lmao

2019-10-19 01:59:04 UTC  

@Roko cool

2019-10-19 01:59:05 UTC  

I mean

2019-10-19 01:59:10 UTC  

imagine being loyal to fucking idea what a joke

2019-10-19 01:59:11 UTC  

Most AnCaps don't read theory

2019-10-19 01:59:14 UTC  

So, that's fair.

2019-10-19 01:59:16 UTC  

don't take his freedom of lying away

2019-10-19 01:59:17 UTC  

Most ancaps don't read

2019-10-19 01:59:22 UTC  

Yes

2019-10-19 01:59:23 UTC  

True

2019-10-19 01:59:28 UTC  

first of all, its conceptually impossible that it didn't

2019-10-19 01:59:31 UTC  

@Banjod stfu you accuse everyone of lying lmao

2019-10-19 01:59:38 UTC  

He is right every time too

2019-10-19 01:59:39 UTC  

second of all, that isn't the only example of prohibition that we have

2019-10-19 01:59:40 UTC  

@Fénius Farsaid that's a lie

2019-10-19 01:59:52 UTC  

I just provided example number two

2019-10-19 01:59:58 UTC  

Why does it need to be alcohol?

2019-10-19 02:01:03 UTC  

are you not a traditionalist?

2019-10-19 02:01:14 UTC  

alcoholism is part of european identity

2019-10-19 02:01:28 UTC  

@Leaf Because how you prohibit both varies greatly, also, cigs have never been totally banned in the states to my knowledge.

2019-10-19 02:01:39 UTC  

@Banjod I'm not, I just like alcohol.

2019-10-19 02:01:51 UTC  

I want it preserved because I think those aspects of Europe are cool

2019-10-19 02:01:52 UTC  

i was mocking you

2019-10-19 02:01:58 UTC  

And aesthetically pleasing

2019-10-19 02:02:04 UTC  

this is the things you've pretty much said

2019-10-19 02:02:27 UTC  

the bottle is the only asthetic thing to alcohol

2019-10-19 02:02:37 UTC  

have you ever noticed