Message from @Nerthulas

Discord ID: 634932903549206528


2019-10-19 01:55:22 UTC  

@Nerthulas How would you know? You haven't read it.

2019-10-19 01:55:24 UTC  

no, you explain to me why prohibition of something will increase its consumption

2019-10-19 01:55:35 UTC  

And yes, your data is trash. Accept it.

2019-10-19 01:55:40 UTC  

we're not in politics you junkie

2019-10-19 01:55:40 UTC  

you don't even know, and you're using it to make an argument

2019-10-19 01:55:41 UTC  

His data is accurate

2019-10-19 01:55:47 UTC  

politics is a means

2019-10-19 01:55:49 UTC  

You not liking it doesn't determine it's accuracy

2019-10-19 01:55:50 UTC  

that was ***one*** study

2019-10-19 01:55:51 UTC  

Name some good anime I haven't seen

2019-10-19 01:56:02 UTC  

conceptually, its not even possible that it could not be reduced

2019-10-19 01:56:04 UTC  

its stops being a means the second it is no longer a tool for us

2019-10-19 01:56:06 UTC  

second of all

2019-10-19 01:56:12 UTC  

@TheUserNameofPeace Black Clover, assuming you are okay with some childishness

2019-10-19 01:56:19 UTC  

we have other cases than american prohibition of alcohol

2019-10-19 01:56:24 UTC  

countless

2019-10-19 01:56:27 UTC  

I'll check it out @Fénius Farsaid

2019-10-19 01:56:31 UTC  

@Leaf Okay, prove it.

2019-10-19 01:56:33 UTC  

You may or may not like it

2019-10-19 01:56:35 UTC  

It is hit or miss

2019-10-19 01:56:40 UTC  

particularly the one we've been talking about, Russia's 42% decrease in consumption

2019-10-19 01:56:42 UTC  

i'll say this agian, he will just refuse it until you convince him emotionally

2019-10-19 01:56:47 UTC  

Ok one seond

2019-10-19 01:56:48 UTC  

this position is not a logical one

2019-10-19 01:56:49 UTC  

second

2019-10-19 01:56:51 UTC  

it's an emotion

2019-10-19 01:57:09 UTC  

feels over reals

2019-10-19 01:57:33 UTC  

you can ltiearlly see it, no matter what you say, he'll just keep saying "but I want x"

2019-10-19 01:57:39 UTC  

conceptually, its not even ***possible*** that it does not decrease, or increases consumption

2019-10-19 01:57:43 UTC  

its impossible completely

2019-10-19 01:57:56 UTC  

the book you're talking about probably does not even make that argument

2019-10-19 01:57:59 UTC  

"Research conducted by the Ministry of Health regarding the consumption of tobacco influenced both public education and state policy; in reflection of the discoveries of the administration's health department, considerable measures were taken to curtail the consumption of tobacco. These measures included prohibitions on the sale of tobacco to minors, of smoking in public areas and within the armed forces, restrictions on the advertisement of tobacco products. Additionally, several tobacco advertising and manufacturing companies were forcibly closed by the state. These measures, while successful in some regards, were limited in their effeciacy by the Second World War. Nonetheless, the daily tobacco intake of the average serviceman was reduced by 25% and prohibitions on smoking in public were effective in eliminating the consumption of tobacco among a majority of minors." @Weaboo Kempeitai

2019-10-19 01:57:59 UTC  

but makes other ones

2019-10-19 01:58:00 UTC  

I cannot speak for @Weaboo Kempeitai, but when I was an ancap my position(s) was not dictated by emotion, but by a priori reasoning. This is the case with almost every libertarian. It's philosophical for them, not practical.

2019-10-19 01:58:28 UTC  

ancaps endorse lying

2019-10-19 01:58:31 UTC  

its loyalty to ideology is what it is

2019-10-19 01:58:39 UTC  

I'm fairly sure this is true

2019-10-19 01:58:44 UTC  

that they just endorse it

2019-10-19 01:58:44 UTC  

@Leaf We're talking about alcohol tho

2019-10-19 01:58:47 UTC  

@TheUserNameofPeace
Shinsekai yori is breddy cool

2019-10-19 01:58:52 UTC  

No, we're talking about prohibition