He is an intellectual who rarely waivers on his principles

He literally lied about numbers to make a point

Which numbers?

We've had this talk before, PV had a video on it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1jsWrQu7CQ

Oh wait, not PV I guess

Anyway, he had a new one ripped in this video

PV = People's Veto I assume

That is the same guy you linked

He changed his name back to The Alternative Hypothesis

Ah ok

Yeah I don't watch a lot of his videos so I didn't notice

That incident was just a misunderstanding between them

No, it wasn't

JF straight up lied

Of course this discord doesn't agree with Sargon on returning to a better tradition, y'all furries.

I thought it was the conservatives who were constantly bashing Sargon for being a leftie.

But now that it's about keeping the porn industry intact, suddenly "go Sargon"

Plus, he unironically used the term "sacred" in his video

Sargon = Computing Forever 2.0? <:Veemote:501103628883591188>

The other day he told us that we should shower regularly

Can you imagine the gall

He shall be banished from our midst for such heresy

Sargon: Freedom of speech! Liberty or death!
Also Sargon: I don't know about porn, man...

Yeah, he's reasonable. I'm sure you don't like that.

Reasonable about what?

I don't know at which point he has used reason in that entire video

Still worthy to remember whenever that autistic shit is mentioned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQ90iSGpJM

It's practically about Alt-Hype and his apologists.

Have AR actually addressed that video?

Rather than beating Kraut over the head all the time.

Or retards like One Species.

Will give it a watch

You just posted a colttaine video! Based

Jews have multiple ethnicities, I can point them out on FST maps if you want me too

What you don’t seem to understand is that religions or certain sects of a religion will be around a certain ethnicity

@whiic also isn’t that video just criticizing how the supposedly the “AR” misuses regression to the mean?

@snake Ok, so what ethnicity are Catholics? What ethnicity are Lutherans? What ethnicity are Buddhists? Satanists?

Because what you said is a load of unbelievable hogwash.

Catholics are typically around the Mediterranean area of Europe, now they are also in Latin America in ex Spanish colonies that have roughly 50% Spanish admixture on average

Now you’re correct to say “no religions don’t neatly surround one group”

But with Judaism it is actually the case

Doesn't that pretty much debunk your religion is tied to ethnicity/race?

Jews seem to think they're a race iirc
https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.5220113

Not really, why hasn’t Catholicism spread into Arabic states?

Why do they maintain Islam ?

And we believe Kikes when we want to believe Kikes. If Kikes say original Europeans we wuz kangs, then Kike lies.

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-have-never-been-and-will-never-be-white/

> Jews have never been and will never be White

@Monstrous Moonshine Dammit, I was about to post that <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Why is it that Northern Europeans have Protestantism, southern meds have Catholicism, and Eastern Europeans Eastern Orthodox?

But when Kike says "Jews" is a race ... despite there being Jews in Ethiopia:

Same race, totally, because Haaretz says.

Aight, Antisemite.

@whiic As for that video, it is filled with idiotic strawman arguments and a misunderstanding of AR's positions

How come Haaretz is credible or totally nonsensical propaganda depending on convenience...

They claim to be jewish but there is doubt on if they’re really so

Like actual debate

Even Shaun, the Breadtube leftist, made a marginally better video lmao

It's funny how you Nazi spergs like to Kike propaganda what it suits your agenda.

Suddenly Kike not lie anymore.

>inb4 Katz posts something like "fellow white people" on titter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBc7qBS1Ujo

@whiic

Yeah because we aren’t denying what’s on the FST map

Ashkenazis cluster together

That shouldn’t be surprising at all

This is the one Alt Hype is currently responding to, in many parts

@Xaverius Yeah, the propagandists do the switch my race stuff often.

But we should trust the Kike when they say they are separate race. Not when they say they are white.

Well I think their white, just a different ethnicity

Most people disagree with me on that

However Jews will often say their white when they want to bash whites

Then say they aren’t when they want to be a victim

So it doesn’t really matter to me if their technically white or not

Yeah, they use "whiteness" to attack other whites (to get a pass from racism accusations). Then retract away from whiteness to Jewness to not be held to their own critique of whites.

They eat and keep the cake, so to speak.

Slimy tactics.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-rabbinate-accused-of-using-dna-testing-to-prove-jewishness-1.6902132
🤡 🌎

Yeah, and I think we all hate them for it

But no slimier than Alt-Right motte-and-bailey with descriptive and prescriptive ethnostate not being differentiated from each other.

Alt-Right is just Kikedom for Aryans.

Yeah but Idk what you want me to do there

You just kinda sperg out when I try helping so

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf

Apparently the black father myth has been debunked

I mean all my black friends have dads but i thought we were weird but ig not

I mean i talk to a lot of people from philly as well and their dads are still around

r/ZoomerRight banned

F

Now little wehraboos can't form pseudo-homosexual relationships on Reddit

Sad

Spiteful mutant spotted

When's hope rational / irrational?
What's hope?

@ETBrooD

Keep it shorter if you don't mind.

idk tbh, I was just throwing in my 2 cents <:slurpgon:583424900732157956>

Ah

BTFO

Sq crcl got GOT.

Eh?

i kid

I adult
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

This is something that I've been thinking about... With most of our transactions happening with credit cards/debit cards or online, should we get rid of physical cash alltogether?

If yes, why?
If no, why not?

Only yes if it isn't going to be another 'fiat currency'

No backing up means the 'operator' gets to scribble or take off zeros by their whims

https://infogalactic.com/info/Fiat_mone

So you don't want the bank to have control over all your money, basically?

no.
(a) "most" isn't "all". and sometimes card networks go down from time to time (which is *one* of the reasons why i like to always keep a bit of cash on hand)

(b) "getting rid of physical cash" would be a gov't action (cuz the gov't is the one authorized/responsible for printing money); thus effectively __criminalizing__ non-digital transactions (other than barter, ofc; but how many ppl would that effect?)

-which brings me to (c) what would be the real motive for the gov't to take such action?
there are 3 main institutions that would be the primary benefactors: tax agencies, law enforcement, and the intelligence community. (any banking interests would be simply consequential)
iow, this is how an even more intrusive police state is advanced.

Why would you want any bank to tell you how much your money is worth? @Swedishmafia101

it never ceases to amaze me how much privacy/liberty ppl are willing to forfeit for the sake of convenience.
smdh

Good points

What/how do you think?

I don't want to trust neither the government nor the banks to manage all of my money and transactions

How could that work in your opinion?

I mean... at least if I want to, I theoretically could withdraw everything from my bank account and hide it under the bed or something. If cash was abolished, that would not be possible.

tbh, i currently only do digital transactions when it is necessary.
for everything else, i go strictly cash.
ain't nobody's business how i spend my money.

If you had to make a guess, who do you think will be first booted off Yt now that the new TOS (viability bs) is in force?

Is it going to be someone (no order)

Political wrong thinker?
Math tutorial wrong thinker?
Reviewer wrong thinker?
... Etc

i think i need to fill your mouth with andrew yangs' yang cream

whipped cream

dont know where else to put this but here https://www.bitchute.com/video/mZpeJkSNjcA3/

quite interesting

Nope

why

Personal preference

(saw it today a couple of times already)

you watched a, idk 4 hour documentary several times today?

I didn't watch an 'idk 4 hour documentary', no.

im not sure how long it is

so you just saw the link posted a few times today is what you mean?

What I meant to say with my inaccurate wording (my bad) earlier on is that I've seen that content propping up in various channels throughout the day.

im sure it has a pro-nazi bias, but its interesting to see the rationality behind certain decisions

its not like hitler just appeared and went to war while burning jews

It sounds like you are minimising it down to '10 curious facts about a deeply troubled drug addict who loved animals and was vegan'. Is it just me?

what is your impression of me

Pfff

do you think im a hitler apologist?

do you think im an ethnat?

Need time for that dude/dudette

because it seems to me that you came out right away as if im on the side of Ford or Snake or Nick Fuentes etc

Even if you claimed one or the other, that doesn't mean your actions would line up necessarily. If I can, I take my time getting to know someone.

i linked a documentary that puts more detail on history, and why certain things happened, and you jump to me trying to reduce what hitler did as 'but he was vegan lol, not so bad'

I see, so that's what you perceive of how and what you did. Ok.

whether its entirely accurate or not, i dont know, but you went to some kind of character judgement very quickly

i put in here the debate channel to see what the reaction to it is if anyone has seen it or thinks of it

Did I? Where? How? Can you show me?

'It sounds like you are minimising it down to '10 curious facts about a deeply troubled drug addict who loved animals and was vegan'. Is it just me?'

right away it comes off as strawmanning

as if im saying OMG THIS IS SO TRUE, EVIL JEWS, HEIL HITLER

I must admit that I have my own biases.

Apart from that, would you say that this is void ofany moral consideration and focuses on the 'curiosities'?

"im sure it has a pro-nazi bias, but its interesting to see the rationality behind certain decisions"

having a bias doesnt mean everything is fake

the treaty of versaille happened

the jews being deported happened

hitler's life happened

Well, that doesn't answer my last question

and its good to see how certain things came to be

youre looking at the end result of what Hitler became, rather than what he was before that, and why he did what he did

is history in general just a curiosity to you?

not something to learn from?

Also, which part of the drug addict, vegan, animal lover is inaccurate?

i dont know

the video hasnt touched on those things significantly yet

and if it has, ive not recognizsed them

because ive watched the first hour of the video so far and you havent

You didn't know?

dont know dont care

its not relevent

Ah

Now I get it

hitler being vegen doesnt explain to me why he invaded the Rhineland

Those references were there to help

hitler liking dogs doesnt explain to me why he deported jews

hitler being a drug addict doesnt explain to me his entire life background to shape him into a country's leader

Sure. Don't know why you make it out like anybody said that but ok.

because you DID say it

No I didn't.

'It sounds like you are minimising it down to '10 curious facts about a deeply troubled drug addict who loved animals and was vegan'. Is it just me?
'

thats your initial impression

when it had nothing to do with anything in the video or why i linked it

done with this

Sorry, I'm not able to find the

1."hitler being vegen doesnt explain to me why he invaded the Rhineland"
Or
2."hitler liking dogs doesnt explain to me why he deported jews"
Or
3."hitler being a drug addict doesnt explain to me his entire life background to shape him into a country's leader"


Please, don't put words into my mouth. Is that ok with you?

"done with this"

Sure. Thanks for the reveal too.

https://www.sbs.com.au/food/article/2017/12/13/why-hitler-wasnt-vegetarian-and-aryan-vegan-diet-isnt-what-it-seems

there's a case to make that Hitler wasn't even a vegan

and AFAIK, I've seen it mentioned that he also ate meat to some extent (I don't remember how OFTEN, but it was mentioned that he DID eat meat) during the period of time that people consider him to be a Vegan or Vegetarian (though people use both words, it's actually Vegan, since apparently he just ate fruits and veggies), so that would actually exclude him from being either of them

youre a mong Sq

Name calling? That's where you choose to be?

no youre literally a mong

sarcastic mongery

you literally had no context of what i was saying because you didnt watch the video

you reduce what i was trying to say with >vegan dog drugs

Feel free to call me whatever you want, no worries

and then say you didnt try reducing what i was saying, by reducing what i was saying

all the time, not understanding the context of the video

which makes no mention of any of those things

big cock libertarians enter the chat

and i never expressed my reasoning to be reducing it to 'oh he just did 1 2 3 he must be nice'

Yes. I don't need to watch the documentary because I know he wasn't right in the head the first place. Same as with serial killers. I don't give a damn what they were thinking...

amazing

this is why youre a mong

'they was just insane'

fucking fantastic historical perspective there

not that he was ELECTED

not that there were reasons that people AGREED WITH HIM ON

he was just nuts

how convenient to never have to engage

Repeating doesn't make it true, only makes me respect you less and less

just dismiss people you dont like as being insane

and pretend ww2 was just a woopsie

with nothing to learn from

because 'he was always just a nutbar'

youre not right in the head Sq

there

easy

now what

Again, please don't try to put words in my mouth. Won't work.

'Yes. I don't need to watch the documentary because I know he wasn't right in the head the first place'

youre own words

in your own mouth

Hahaha

you absolute mong

Hahaha

Whatever

'he wassnt right in the head, but im not saying he was crazy!'

mongery

You have such a great vocabulary.

'why did X happen? cuz they was crazy ,move on'

great argumentation

mong mong mong mong mong mong mong mong mong mong mong mong mong mong

thank you for coming to my TedTalk.

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

i dont need to exercise my incredible diction of insults with someone with the argumentation ability of a fork

Mong. Do you know what does it mean ?

(I'm having too much time watching old Jimquisition videos.)

(Yeah, the guy is lefty, but he does good consumer advocacy, as long as he doesn't comment on games' narratives.)

https://i.gyazo.com/c878f7cd5537e198baa8d7621edfedca.png

fuckin supermarket trolleys

It was not a question.

Ref: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnzN-3N_0xw

Good debate

"Adolf Hitler-The Greatest Story Never Told" is a pile of pseudohistorical horseshit

✝️

NO STEP ON SNEK!

NO STEP