So you don't want the bank to have control over all your money, basically?

no.
(a) "most" isn't "all". and sometimes card networks go down from time to time (which is *one* of the reasons why i like to always keep a bit of cash on hand)

(b) "getting rid of physical cash" would be a gov't action (cuz the gov't is the one authorized/responsible for printing money); thus effectively __criminalizing__ non-digital transactions (other than barter, ofc; but how many ppl would that effect?)

-which brings me to (c) what would be the real motive for the gov't to take such action?
there are 3 main institutions that would be the primary benefactors: tax agencies, law enforcement, and the intelligence community. (any banking interests would be simply consequential)
iow, this is how an even more intrusive police state is advanced.

Why would you want any bank to tell you how much your money is worth? @Swedishmafia101

it never ceases to amaze me how much privacy/liberty ppl are willing to forfeit for the sake of convenience.
smdh

Good points

What/how do you think?

I don't want to trust neither the government nor the banks to manage all of my money and transactions

How could that work in your opinion?

I mean... at least if I want to, I theoretically could withdraw everything from my bank account and hide it under the bed or something. If cash was abolished, that would not be possible.

tbh, i currently only do digital transactions when it is necessary.
for everything else, i go strictly cash.
ain't nobody's business how i spend my money.

If you had to make a guess, who do you think will be first booted off Yt now that the new TOS (viability bs) is in force?

Is it going to be someone (no order)

Political wrong thinker?
Math tutorial wrong thinker?
Reviewer wrong thinker?
... Etc

i think i need to fill your mouth with andrew yangs' yang cream

whipped cream

dont know where else to put this but here https://www.bitchute.com/video/mZpeJkSNjcA3/

quite interesting

Nope

why

Personal preference

(saw it today a couple of times already)

you watched a, idk 4 hour documentary several times today?

I didn't watch an 'idk 4 hour documentary', no.

im not sure how long it is

so you just saw the link posted a few times today is what you mean?

What I meant to say with my inaccurate wording (my bad) earlier on is that I've seen that content propping up in various channels throughout the day.

im sure it has a pro-nazi bias, but its interesting to see the rationality behind certain decisions

its not like hitler just appeared and went to war while burning jews

It sounds like you are minimising it down to '10 curious facts about a deeply troubled drug addict who loved animals and was vegan'. Is it just me?

what is your impression of me

Pfff

do you think im a hitler apologist?

do you think im an ethnat?

Need time for that dude/dudette

because it seems to me that you came out right away as if im on the side of Ford or Snake or Nick Fuentes etc

Even if you claimed one or the other, that doesn't mean your actions would line up necessarily. If I can, I take my time getting to know someone.

i linked a documentary that puts more detail on history, and why certain things happened, and you jump to me trying to reduce what hitler did as 'but he was vegan lol, not so bad'

I see, so that's what you perceive of how and what you did. Ok.

whether its entirely accurate or not, i dont know, but you went to some kind of character judgement very quickly

i put in here the debate channel to see what the reaction to it is if anyone has seen it or thinks of it

Did I? Where? How? Can you show me?

'It sounds like you are minimising it down to '10 curious facts about a deeply troubled drug addict who loved animals and was vegan'. Is it just me?'