However Jews will often say their white when they want to bash whites

Then say they aren’t when they want to be a victim

So it doesn’t really matter to me if their technically white or not

Yeah, they use "whiteness" to attack other whites (to get a pass from racism accusations). Then retract away from whiteness to Jewness to not be held to their own critique of whites.

They eat and keep the cake, so to speak.

Slimy tactics.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-rabbinate-accused-of-using-dna-testing-to-prove-jewishness-1.6902132
🤡 🌎

Yeah, and I think we all hate them for it

But no slimier than Alt-Right motte-and-bailey with descriptive and prescriptive ethnostate not being differentiated from each other.

Alt-Right is just Kikedom for Aryans.

Yeah but Idk what you want me to do there

You just kinda sperg out when I try helping so

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf

Apparently the black father myth has been debunked

I mean all my black friends have dads but i thought we were weird but ig not

I mean i talk to a lot of people from philly as well and their dads are still around

r/ZoomerRight banned

F

Now little wehraboos can't form pseudo-homosexual relationships on Reddit

Sad

Spiteful mutant spotted

When's hope rational / irrational?
What's hope?

@ETBrooD

Keep it shorter if you don't mind.

idk tbh, I was just throwing in my 2 cents <:slurpgon:583424900732157956>

Ah

BTFO

Sq crcl got GOT.

Eh?

i kid

I adult
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

This is something that I've been thinking about... With most of our transactions happening with credit cards/debit cards or online, should we get rid of physical cash alltogether?

If yes, why?
If no, why not?

Only yes if it isn't going to be another 'fiat currency'

No backing up means the 'operator' gets to scribble or take off zeros by their whims

https://infogalactic.com/info/Fiat_mone

So you don't want the bank to have control over all your money, basically?

no.
(a) "most" isn't "all". and sometimes card networks go down from time to time (which is *one* of the reasons why i like to always keep a bit of cash on hand)

(b) "getting rid of physical cash" would be a gov't action (cuz the gov't is the one authorized/responsible for printing money); thus effectively __criminalizing__ non-digital transactions (other than barter, ofc; but how many ppl would that effect?)

-which brings me to (c) what would be the real motive for the gov't to take such action?
there are 3 main institutions that would be the primary benefactors: tax agencies, law enforcement, and the intelligence community. (any banking interests would be simply consequential)
iow, this is how an even more intrusive police state is advanced.

Why would you want any bank to tell you how much your money is worth? @Swedishmafia101

it never ceases to amaze me how much privacy/liberty ppl are willing to forfeit for the sake of convenience.
smdh

Good points

What/how do you think?