I guess you could argue that it could be proven that women would be happier, but even then there’s no way that could ever be universal so you’re just left with “ most women would be happy staying at home”

But even if you could prove that

Being happier isn’t intrinsically better

If that’s all there was people would just say “ it’s scientifically proven if you buy like a ton of cocaine and overdose on all of it in a day, that’s scientifically the best use of your time “

And “society being better off” also is again subjective

If there was an objectively “better” way to do society

We wouldn’t call it the Right and the Left

We’d call it the Correct and the Wrong

But society and reality don’t work like that

The stats prove woman have been getting unhappier since joining the work force. Also, divorce has sky rocketed and it is fair to say it might be a factor.

@Griselda happier lives sounds better to me

Stay at home moms have the highest happiness rates of any other career that women pursue

Children who come from families with stay at home moms are less likely to be involved in crime, do better in school, and lead more successful lives in general

That sounds like a net benefit to society to me

Yeah I’m agreeing that most of that stuff is better

I guess I was more arguing semantics

So that was just a flaw on my part

Oops

@Alexander Ramsey

I think the question is worded poorly

It’s wether they should do both or should be required to choose

That’s kind of a false dichotomy

A better question would be

Should they do both or shouldn’t they do both

Not should they do both or should they not have a say

Because there are so many in between

I think most people would understand single mothers, single woman, and married woman without children working. As a SAHM myself we have many things that will need to change in order for the majority of women to stay home.

Single mothers are the product of a dysfunctional society

^

net drain too

The majority of single mothers are on welfare

and their kids are more likely to become criminals and feed off welfare as well

The majority are minorities

I had a good resource but not on the PC im on rn

Im on vacation

I'm pretty sure I've seen what you would be posting anyway

The color of crime

thats the source

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

What's the easiest way to lower crime and its related activities?

societal change

ok i have a better daily question

Remove repeat offenders from society completely, and change the view of society on crime

ok nvm u wanna know the EASIEST way to lower crime

is have no crimes under law

aka ancapistan

mandatory intense prison-labor for all inmates

"Related activities"

remove blacks

I think what he meant by that

is how do we lower crime, and lower the rates of things considered crimes

that’s not easy when tyrone has evolved to physically dominate u 😃

not just "make it legal"

ur right i was being a smartass

it happens

labor camps, and tech advancement will counterbalance any incentive that might form for prison labor

Crime bye

Demographics change. But if that can't happen, bring back brutal punishment.

Lol i almost missed qotd cause i was sleeping

Anyway

**ahem**

INDIVIDUAL

Single motherhood needs to be discouraged. Also, can’t have people on death row for 20 years.

educate prisonersl

or execute them

just execute them

why do u want the easiest way to lower crime

shouldn't you seek the best way

because that way also allows for the most pragmatic use of government funds

The best way to lower crime in general is probably keeping people as busy as possible with a maximum buy into a lawful culture . High employment. Strong families. Involved communities. Clubs, fraternities. General brother and sisterhood. Zero social tolerance for criminal culture.

i

h,,,

@Deleted User that and educations. You are way more likely to be a criminal the poorer you are, and being uneducated is a ticket to poverty. The first step is always fix the school system

Always always always

what if children refuse education

@Deleted User that’s not acceptable. We need parents that actually raise and discipline

Children refusing education shouldn’t even be a concern if parents actually do their job

Children don’t have the capacity and foresight to realize the flaws in their actions

That’s the whole point of a parent

If a student is refusing education

You haven’t fixed the education system

how do you incentivize parents to make their kids not refuse education

'cus some kids will go to school but refuse to be educated in the process

''If a student is refusing education
You haven’t fixed the education system'' you said it was the parent's fault

Legalize all victimless crimes

Mfw injecting testosterone is a crime in 2018 only because of some faggots that watch baseball

fucken druggie cunt

@Deleted User the parents haven’t been educated on how to raise fucking children

So yes

I still see that as education

what is the way to 'raise fucking children'

That’s a question I could answer if I was educated on raising children

The way the last couple western generations have been known to do it is the wrong way

Even if I’m wrong in it being a huge factor relating to crime and education

I don’t think it’s controversial to see that that’s a big change we need going foreword

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should journalists that knowingly report false news stories lose their right to work in that field by law? If no, what should the response be?

depending on wha you define as "false news"

If any misunderstanding happened when reporting then little to no reprimanding should occur

no, it brushes the stroke too broad and the truth is a living thing not set in stone forever; all details about a particular subject don't immediately come out. In fact, I'm pretty sure we didn't find out why Elvis died until last year (he died in 1977)

rather than lose their right to work, reprimand their organization/workspace. solves a lot of problems

Problem is, the Legacy Media knowingly publishes false information, then retracts it later after the damage is done. They do it all the time to drum up outrage over the favored cause of the day.

It would be one thing if there were genuine inaccuracies, but generally speaking, the papers and cable news are more than happy to play fast and loose with the facts, then play coy afterwards.

of course they should (making emphasis in **KNOWINGLY**)

The problem is it'd be either very hard or flat out impossible to prove these people did it with that intention on the spot

Yeah, years later after the damage was already done

Lets take CNN blatantly lying on the primaries for example reporting estimates that were waaaaaaay off

Was it intentional? Was it not? No way to make sure

But even with this, it'd be worthy to see this enforced

Media should be controlled by the state.

If you're willing to take the risk of completely biased and censored news

all current news is biased and censored

Ofc, private media has the problem of yellow journalism
but with a free market system the more objective news outlets have the chance to thrive while public distrust obviously biased ones

the free market is doomed to be dominated by a single group

and what it most consumers distrust the group and stop buying their products?

that probably won’t happen, if the real world is anything to go by

maybe they will start listening to the same people called something different but that seems to be the extent of it

That would be impossible to enforce in a country like America without infringing on the First Amendment. Anyone can engage in the activities of the press. Write a blog, make a YouTube video, hell even tweet live from an event.Becoming a journalist has no legal requirements, or restrictions.

The best response to fake news, and those that create it, is simply to call it out. I archive shitty articles and when I do, I alway put their name on it, and the name of the news outlet. Over time companies and people become tainted by their actions. Think about CNN. That brand has been devastated in the past few years.

If anything should be done legally, maybe make slander and libel laws stronger.

the question didn’t say that the answer had to be constitutional

Yeah, but then why would you prefer a state-controlled media when this is virtually impossible instead of the latter when there's at least a chance in your hypothesis of an absolute monopoly?

I know. @Deleted User I just thought I’d comment about it in the context of the country I live in.

I mean if both are corrupt to the teeth and have control over the field, what makes you pick one over the other?

id prefer a state that wasnt corrupt

which before anyone says otherwise, is very possible, and has existed

but if both are corrupt, it is better for people to choose the state over some malicious interest group exploiting capitalism

unfortunately in america both of these options may as well be the same when it comes down to it

journalism shouldn't be regulated by the state

@21tagtmeiern join vc

can't rn

gay

u can listen to it after its done

@Deleted User Losing they’re rights is far too much, maybe defamation or slander charges youth

I don't really have much to add to this qotd, other then news should be kept as a private business, and the only recourse that should come from fake news is the public not believing you. if the public won't take the time to check your shitty stories then they deserve to be lied to

what about when news organizations become large corporations? should they still be privately run then? i'd think some kind of democratically influenced government regulation would be preferable in that case

I think especially then, I don't want the government involved in the people that are supposed to be talking about them

i'd be supportive of some kind of unionized media surveillance, alongside some law that penalizes journalists for spreading false information while there's reasonable basis for determining that it was intentional

also some sort of legislation that criminalizes large corporations and government agencies from bribing news groups

and by media surveillance i mean activity which monitors the reporting of news groups

outside the workplace of a licensed news organization, i think news workers should of course have the usual freedom of speech that other national residents possess

yeah I can see that being reasonable

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should we have universal healthcare? How would it work? How would we fund it?

No

yes

Can't work with fatties

In Japan it would work fine

Hmmmm, no

Whites are degenerate

so it won't work for us

You would need social pressures like Japan where you can lose your job for being too fat (cost of healthcare pushed onto employer)

Im actually a nurse yes i work in the field of medicine as a professional

@Deleted User WOAH there buddy https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O8J2yDcJdYw

So i have extensive knowledge on this topic

No

It's the ideal place for universal healthcare

the amount of money that CEOs of insurance companies make could easily cover universal healthcare

I mean that America is physically degenerate you tard

especially if you sort out treatment and the health of a nation

What would you call America?

66% overweight

this nation is a fucking joke

Im a medical professional

I mean here's a better example

Denmark could do it

Because there aren't FUCKING FATTIES

In America we have voting yeah, so if we allow universal healthcare to pass do you think they'll ever allow a restriction on fatties/drug users?

Fatties/drug users are over 50% of the population

So I'd pay their way

fuck that

I'm pretty sure these QOTD are asked with idea that if it was an ideal state

Don't think so

No they asked who was your favorite US president once

Unless you think US was ideal at any point in its history

Haha

All I'm saying is, universal healthcare barely works in Japan/Denmark which are far healthier than the USA

My favorite was Grant

or really most white countries

@Da_Fish NEIN!

Whites are physically degenerate

Don’t ping me for answers

...........

Denmark

Is white

It's also a good reason why the ethnostate would be a fucking joke, most American whites are too lazy to stop being fat let alone establish an ethnostate lmao

Sorry to inform you man

Denmark is a small sample and isolated

UK is also fucking obese so they have a terrible universal healthcare system too

Why not just make a universal healthcare system where the people who support it opt in to the taxes, And if you don’t, opt out

@Griselda literally not universal healthcare

that's a private insurance scheme

We’d need some way to ensure people took better care of themselves.

@Deleted User oops

Well then that’s my answer to the question of the day. Private insurance scheme

@Deleted User I said Japan did this but got shitposted on. In Japan you can lose your job for being too fat as the company will have to pay huge fees for your health insurance.

it's tricky for the government to enforce those programs tho @Deleted User

Japan does it fine

but you can't start with America or the UK

Japan is the most degenerate country on Earth

with 66% overweight

Both private and public have their advantages and downfalls

@Deleted User yah keep worshipping your anglo fatties

I'm talking about physical degeneracy

Doesn't matter if they're fatties or not

66% overweight/obese

brown people

oof

No country on Earth has been destroyed more by capitalism and modernity than Japan

Honestly sugar/refined carbs should just be taxed to shit

and they didn't even have to flood in immigrants

US can hang on to private healthcare cause the standard of living is really good

Rather be poor and homogenous

You get me?

with low crime

there's a reason their birthrates are extremely low

Interesting. I’d rather the person be taxed. Not the company. @Deleted User

@21tagtmeiern yeah. I bet. That’s why I’m not promoting it personally.

than rich, multicultural, retarded, and fat

walk into the wrong neighborhood get shot

I don't think you have any fucking clue how bad it is there

@Deleted User well it's really a better system than even taxing the person directly, because the company will just fire you

especially in the cities

where?

Otaku culture alone is enough to show the degeneracy

Thats always the comeback everybody uses when someone attempts to even vaguely praise japan

Oh they have declining population

All I've said is that japan isn't full of fatties

no, you also called an entire race degenerates

Aren’t Otaku’s a western thing tho

yeah

most american whites are degenerate

66% overweight

Japan fat shames like a boss

add in drug users it goes to probably like 75%

most Japanese are degenerates

of all whites are either drug users or overweight

I don't know what else to call that

Far east = western culture

All people are degenerates

should I be nice to them because they are white?

As if 75% medicated, elderly, fat, or on drugs is an acceptable standard for people you live with?

Who’s more degenerate? Americans or the Japanese?
🤔🤔🤔

Sounds like a funny debate.

Whites are physically degenerate

I mean should we genocide them

Whats your solution

@Froce no, like if you’re Japanese and like Japanese media it’s not an otaku, that’s specifically a western person who is obsessed with Japanese stuff

you mean like Japan which is 70% Boomers

Yeah no I mean like the age range of 18-50

Look at military recruitment standards

Japs have basically become mindless capitalist atomatons

they even admit 70% of all 18 year olds can't pass them

obesity is for 20%

50% are meds/mental illness/etc.