INDIVIDUAL

Single motherhood needs to be discouraged. Also, can’t have people on death row for 20 years.

educate prisonersl

or execute them

just execute them

why do u want the easiest way to lower crime

shouldn't you seek the best way

because that way also allows for the most pragmatic use of government funds

The best way to lower crime in general is probably keeping people as busy as possible with a maximum buy into a lawful culture . High employment. Strong families. Involved communities. Clubs, fraternities. General brother and sisterhood. Zero social tolerance for criminal culture.

i

h,,,

@Deleted User that and educations. You are way more likely to be a criminal the poorer you are, and being uneducated is a ticket to poverty. The first step is always fix the school system

Always always always

what if children refuse education

@Deleted User that’s not acceptable. We need parents that actually raise and discipline

Children refusing education shouldn’t even be a concern if parents actually do their job

Children don’t have the capacity and foresight to realize the flaws in their actions

That’s the whole point of a parent

If a student is refusing education

You haven’t fixed the education system

how do you incentivize parents to make their kids not refuse education

'cus some kids will go to school but refuse to be educated in the process

''If a student is refusing education
You haven’t fixed the education system'' you said it was the parent's fault

Legalize all victimless crimes

Mfw injecting testosterone is a crime in 2018 only because of some faggots that watch baseball

fucken druggie cunt

@Deleted User the parents haven’t been educated on how to raise fucking children

So yes

I still see that as education

what is the way to 'raise fucking children'

That’s a question I could answer if I was educated on raising children

The way the last couple western generations have been known to do it is the wrong way

Even if I’m wrong in it being a huge factor relating to crime and education

I don’t think it’s controversial to see that that’s a big change we need going foreword

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Should journalists that knowingly report false news stories lose their right to work in that field by law? If no, what should the response be?

depending on wha you define as "false news"

If any misunderstanding happened when reporting then little to no reprimanding should occur

no, it brushes the stroke too broad and the truth is a living thing not set in stone forever; all details about a particular subject don't immediately come out. In fact, I'm pretty sure we didn't find out why Elvis died until last year (he died in 1977)

rather than lose their right to work, reprimand their organization/workspace. solves a lot of problems

Problem is, the Legacy Media knowingly publishes false information, then retracts it later after the damage is done. They do it all the time to drum up outrage over the favored cause of the day.

It would be one thing if there were genuine inaccuracies, but generally speaking, the papers and cable news are more than happy to play fast and loose with the facts, then play coy afterwards.