Only by people

!rank

!rank

!rank

<:GWnanaREEEEEEEEEE:392308452208410627>

Rank 106

Kc

!top

did you know that north korea has the 4th largest army in the world?

!rank

it don't do top for some reason

!ranks

!rank top

No they dont

ree

that is levels

!levels

Go check **Politicord Simulator**'s leaderboard here https://mee6.xyz/leaderboard/450389123081961472. <:WINK6:403540173566115840>

!levels

Go check **Politicord Simulator**'s leaderboard here https://mee6.xyz/leaderboard/450389123081961472. <:WINK6:403540173566115840>

they do, but only because of the insane amount of conscription

rip my anus amirite gaymen?

again

by what standard

largest

I

by enlisted men

m 5th lmao

sure

yes

noice

but by military size including navy's and air forces

nah

@Adoring Fan No, because nobody with even an elementary-level understanding of socioeconomic relations would even think such a thing. You clearly don't know what being a "capitalist" entails. And Parvus was NEVER an official of any government. He had no governmental authority with which he could exercise in any sense. There's also substantial evidence suggesting he didn't "fund the revolution". He may have been sympathetic and contributed to it in a non-material sense, but he certainly didn't bankroll it.

he was a leading figure and spokesperson in the social democratic party

He was a theoretician with a background in political economy. He wasn't exactly a "leading figure" in the sense that he could exercise political control over anything or anyone. His "power" was minimal, and his role was largely that of an advisor.

no, it seems like nobody in the world except for (You) and people in agreement with you understand what being a capitalist entails. Because like I've said before, only your definitions are valid to you. Not anyone else's. No amount of historical truths will free you from your Marxist post modernist tunnel vision

Equating Marxism with post-modernism now? Okay, Jordan Peterson. Why don't you explain what Marxism and post-modern philosophy actually are? Bet you can't.

can anybody explain to you what Marxism is? And no, I did not equate it, I added them together to form your word masturbation

amazing red herring btw

The Marxian critique of capitalism is a modernist one, it has absolutely nothing to do with post-modern French philosophy aside from the fact that some philosophers associated with that school were influenced by Marxism to a certain extent.

again, I did not equate marxism with post modernism. I stated that you used post modernism to justify marxism

You "added them together" because you're implying that one must be a post-modernist in order to be a Marxist and vice versa.

no I did not

I stated that you specifically used one to achieve the other

hence why I said

"No amount of historical truths will free you from your Marxist post modernist tunnel vision"

amazing how you use post-modernism to try to prove I misrepresent post-modernism

laughable

Oh, so post-modernism is some universally sound body of thought, with absolutely no dissimilarities? It's a direct result of the modernist critique of capitalism presented by Marx and Engels?

no, I am not saying that lmao

Pretty sure you know little to nothing about either and you're just pulling more shit out of your ass in a terrible attempt to save face.

you're, without pause, misrepresenting my words

keep trying

Oh, what is there to misrepresent about "You specifically used one to achieve the other"?

Maybe you should keep studying before you come here and spout off anymore obvious bullshit as though it weren't blatantly obvious that you're far from being an expert on either subject. Does your mental midgetry know no bounds?

fight fight fight fight

Maybe you should cease misrepresenting me. Post-modernism in your use was manipulated subjectivity. I.e.

you used subjective definitions to your advantage in order to subvert objective historically accepted definitions of socialism/capitalism

thus defending marxism

Oh really? Lemme guess, it was manipulated subjectivity to the 9th power thereby necessitating the historical subversion of objective definitionality regarding the theoretical application of socialism in relation to it's linear progression from capitalism? Anymore bullshit red herrings you want to cook up? Maybe you can add even more nonsense to the next one. Gives it more flavor.

⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣠⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣄⢀⠠⡀
⢀⢀⢀⢀⣠⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣤⣙⣿⣿⣾⣷⣄
⢀⢀⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡄
⢀⢀⠜⣿⠙⣹⡻⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄
⢀⢀⣰⣿⢠⣿⣇⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢀⢀⢀⢀
⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢀⢀⠍⠙⢿⡟⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣴⣾⠃
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⠈⢀⡤⢲⣾⣗⠲⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⠻⢿⣿⣿⡿⠃
⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⢙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢀⠰⠁⢰⣾⣿⣿⡇⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠈⢿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣄⡀
⡇⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣇⢀⢀⠙⠷⣍⠛⠛⢀⢀⢀⢀⠙⠋⠉⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢀⡟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⠦
⠰⢀⠻⣿⣿⣿⣧⡙⠆⢀⣀⠤⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣧⢸⢻⣿⣿⠿⢿⡆⠁⠠⠠
⢀⢀⢀⠈⢿⣿⣿⣷⣖⠋⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣀⣀⣄⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⠏⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⢸⣿⣆⢀⢻⣿⣆⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣀⡀
⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⡒⠉⠉⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢈⣴⣿⣿⡿⢀⡿⢀⢻⣿⣆⡈⣿⣿⠂⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠐⣴⠦
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⢀⢀⢀⢀⠐⠄⢀⢀⢀⠈⢀⣀⣴⣿⣿⣿⡿⠁⢀⣡⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣄⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⢀⢀⢀⢀⠐⣠⣾⡏
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢹⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠢⣤⣄⢀⢀⣀⠠⢴⣾⣿⣿⡿⢋⠟⢡⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⡄⣿⣿⢂⠐⢀⣤⡾⡟⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠸⢀⠘⠿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣹⣿⣀⣀⣀⣀⠘⠛⠋⠁⡀⣄⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢀⣿⣿⣴⣾⣿⣭⣄⢀⢀⠂⢀⡀
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⠛⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⢀⢀⢀⣡⣾⣿⣿⣿⡟⣹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣦⣤⣤⡮⠷
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⣶⣿⡿⢛⢿⡇⠟⠰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⢇⢀⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⣿⡿⢉⣭⢭⠏⣿⡿⢸⡏⣼⣿⢴⡇⢸⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⢀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⢀⢀⠠⡀⡐
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢰⣿⣿⣿⢃⣶⣶⡏⠸⠟⣱⣿⣧⣛⣣⢾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠈⢀⢀⡼⠉⠉⠉⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⠟⢻⡿⡉⣷⣬⡛⣵⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡯⢀⢀⠴⠋
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢰⠘⣰⣇⣿⣿⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠘⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡷⢺⣿⠟⣩⣭⣽⣇⠲⠶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠐⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⢐⡈⣿⣷⣶⠎⣹⡟⠟⣛⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠠⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣼⣿⣷⣿⣷⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠐⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠂⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⠼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡄
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠹⠉⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣇
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠓⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠄⡠⣹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣇
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⠉⠛⢦
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠉⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠁⡀
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⡿⠟⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠐
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⠙⠻⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⡟⣿⠹⣮⣿⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠠
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠉⢀⠛⠳⢾⣷⣾⣿⣹⣿⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀

@Deleted User in no way was this a red herring.

You really are a Master Chef. Jordan Ramsayson would be proud.

your word masturbation of marx's theory of the stages of history is impressive, it really is, but that's all it is at the end of the day - word masturbation

marx's theory is nonsensical, subjective bullshit. And postmodernism only enables such bullshit by denying objective truths. By denying objective truths, one can easily delve into the realm of defining socialism/communism/capitalism/power struggles in any way one desires.

Even if I were theoretical masturbator, at least I'm not pleasuring myself to simulated situations through a medium of abstraction which has absolutely no bearing on concrete reality and the material relations therein.

marx disregarded both past and contemporary definitions of economic systems, to enhance his own vision. As a result, his followers only see his definition, an altering of the previously agreed upon meanings of terms such as capitalism and socialism.

like I said, word masturbation. You jacking yourself off to the vast array of words in your vocabulary doesn't shy away from the obvious, objective truth, that you've yet to speak a single truth.

How does he "disregard" them when his writings are filled with commentary that only a highly-educated individual who knows his stuff could provide? He was a Master of not only the classics, but also the popular thought of his day. His knowledge of political economy was vast, and he makes this obvious in his writings.

appeal to authority. You omit the fact that Marx knowingly failed to account for socialistic thought that existed prior to Marx, such as that of Mazdak, Thomas Paine, Chartism, Distributism, etc. All these systems were disregarded as capitalistic because Marx decided to alter previously accepted definitions.

oh, and Prussian Socialism, of course

I love watching facist and communist argue

Who's that guy ^

a liberal

Don’t blame you they’re a bunch of idiots

OH BOY

HE MUST BE THE FIRST

@Adoring Fan Way to take another fallacy out of context. And No, he definitely didn't. It's obvious that you haven't read Marx's thoughts on utopian socialism. You are just a shit-tier pleb-brain that makes claims without justifying them.

I heard Hitler was a hermaphrodite. Don't ask me for a source though.

Why be a liberal, when you can be a *libertarian*

Liberals are a endangered species

strawman

We are the OG liberals

libruls hur hur hur

You new liberals are a sham

how do i go about this

and yes, in his criticism of utopian socialism, marx wrote within the confines of his definitions, of bourgeoisie and proletariat

>wanting to be any form of liberal ever

🤢

^

“Lol we masculine gays were the first gays!”

How about just not be gay?

That isn't a strawman, pal. Learn how to contextualize. Maybe then you'll be able to provide source material in defense of your claims and won't have to to call people out for fallacies they were never responsible for in a shitty attempt to shut down your opposition who you so moronically presume is dumb enough to believe they are at fault.

Yankee doodle keep it up

>Yankee