Message from @tsarsNeezy
Discord ID: 451486682005372929
it don't do top for some reason
!ranks
!rank top
No they dont
ree
that is levels
!levels
Go check **Politicord Simulator**'s leaderboard here https://mee6.xyz/leaderboard/450389123081961472. <:WINK6:403540173566115840>
!levels
Go check **Politicord Simulator**'s leaderboard here https://mee6.xyz/leaderboard/450389123081961472. <:WINK6:403540173566115840>
they do, but only because of the insane amount of conscription
rip my anus amirite gaymen?
again
by what standard
largest
I
by enlisted men
m 5th lmao
sure
yes
but by military size including navy's and air forces
nah
@Adoring Fan No, because nobody with even an elementary-level understanding of socioeconomic relations would even think such a thing. You clearly don't know what being a "capitalist" entails. And Parvus was NEVER an official of any government. He had no governmental authority with which he could exercise in any sense. There's also substantial evidence suggesting he didn't "fund the revolution". He may have been sympathetic and contributed to it in a non-material sense, but he certainly didn't bankroll it.
he was a leading figure and spokesperson in the social democratic party
He was a theoretician with a background in political economy. He wasn't exactly a "leading figure" in the sense that he could exercise political control over anything or anyone. His "power" was minimal, and his role was largely that of an advisor.
no, it seems like nobody in the world except for (You) and people in agreement with you understand what being a capitalist entails. Because like I've said before, only your definitions are valid to you. Not anyone else's. No amount of historical truths will free you from your Marxist post modernist tunnel vision
Equating Marxism with post-modernism now? Okay, Jordan Peterson. Why don't you explain what Marxism and post-modern philosophy actually are? Bet you can't.
can anybody explain to you what Marxism is? And no, I did not equate it, I added them together to form your word masturbation
amazing red herring btw
The Marxian critique of capitalism is a modernist one, it has absolutely nothing to do with post-modern French philosophy aside from the fact that some philosophers associated with that school were influenced by Marxism to a certain extent.
again, I did not equate marxism with post modernism. I stated that you used post modernism to justify marxism
You "added them together" because you're implying that one must be a post-modernist in order to be a Marxist and vice versa.
no I did not
I stated that you specifically used one to achieve the other
hence why I said
"No amount of historical truths will free you from your Marxist post modernist tunnel vision"
amazing how you use post-modernism to try to prove I misrepresent post-modernism
laughable
Oh, so post-modernism is some universally sound body of thought, with absolutely no dissimilarities? It's a direct result of the modernist critique of capitalism presented by Marx and Engels?
no, I am not saying that lmao