No

Most white immigrants, besides Northwestern europeans, vote Democrat

No one that has heritage outside of Cornwall should be considered American

Anyways, let's get back on track

Let's say Trump does an Executive Order along these lines

It's a legislative proposal but I think Trump can say something similar to this

Got it from Button

@ThatRightWingFish I don't know tbh. He probably falls into the crowd of hating boomers, wanting to end immigration, etc

Inevitably, this will have to go through the Supreme Court

Which I can agree with. But tbh, I think thats only the first step

http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2018/08/10/the-myth-of-european-assimilation/

http://i2.wp.com/ideasanddata.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/ratios.png?w=678&ssl=1

Their interpretations of "Social Media" are incredibly massive, including WebMD and Amazon.com as "social media". They are also incredibly broad on free speech, and have described social media as the modern public forum unanimously in a previous ruling.

tbh, this guy should have been POTUS

https://youtu.be/Z_7_jpRYk5g?t=210

"Even with these assumptions, the statute here enacts a prohibition
unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech it burdens.
Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate
with one another on any subject that might come to mind.
With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many
are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for
employment, **speaking and listening in the modern public square**,
and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and
knowledge. Foreclosing access to social media altogether thus prevents
users from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment
rights. Even convicted criminals—and in some instances especially
convicted criminals—might receive legitimate benefits from
these means for access to the world of ideas, particularly if they seek
to reform and to pursue lawful and rewarding lives. "
-Packingham v. North Carolina

I suspect it would take a while for the court to get to this theoretical EO, but in the end they would rule in our favor

Wow, Trump really is Patton's reincarnation

sounds like fake news

wow

Seems that this is actually credible

It's scarcely being reported though

but it has the appearance of credibility due to the amount of sources restating the claim

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-shinzo-abe-pearl-harbor_us_5b856cbbe4b0162f471cd52a

"“I remember Pearl Harbor,” Trump told Abe at a meeting in June, The Washington Post reported Tuesday. "

"During a tense meeting at the White House in June, President Trump caught Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe off guard with a pointed remark.

“I remember Pearl Harbor,” the president said, referring to the surprise attack that propelled the United States into World War II.

Trump then launched into a blistering critique of Japan’s economic policies, according to people familiar with the conversation. He railed against the U.S. trade deficit with Japan and urged Abe to negotiate a bilateral trade deal that is more favorable to U.S. exporters of beef and automobiles."

@ThatRightWingFish where did you find this?

We allow any whites

america should be for all whites

obviously we shouldn't allow leftists in

K

this

@FLanon Why did Trump decide to renew the TPS program

it would be funny

if we took in refugees

an then we could mock the europeons even harder

for actually taking in refugees as opposed to trojan horse bomb baskets

europeons are so fucking stupid and ignorant of american life

Should I hand out libertarian flyers around my neighborhood?

no

no

But WHY

because libertarianism is a cancer on the right wing

Hey hey

Hey

No

Explain

It’s not

it is, it takes social liberal positions and forces the right to move further left on these issues

That’s lite libertarian

Minarchy is different

:)))

Libertarianism is such a large category that it fits so many different ideologies

And libertarianism will not solve the decay of society, the death of the family, the rising drug use, deaths from despair, the loss of identity, and the demographic tide

That can’t be controlled

It is a mechanical, soulless ideology that only has the end of furthering this idea of the free market, nothing more

Especially with authoritarian forfe

it sure can

with a competent state

Statebad

"state bad"

I want a night watchman state

The state isn’t your friend

yeah alright then

They basically are just bully’s asking for your lunch money

He state is

The

state intervention is necessary for prosperity in a wide variety of situations

Like?

well, public utilities like water/electricity for one

not sending kids to coal mines

My biggest problem with the state is property tax

keeping prosperity and intervening in monopolies

@Borb Property tax is the best tax there is out there

keeping vice from the streets

Capitalism can really regulate itself

heh

sure it can

that's what's going on with twitter

Also the Government is technically a monopoly

the state is necessary and a competent one can be quite good for the common good

and that is really what is the end, the common good

You vote with your dollars

right, everything is a market

Take Milton Friedman for example who said that the property tax is the only "good" tax. I agree with him here but the reasons he stated why it was good was because it's the only tax out theere that doesnt penalize productivity unlike the sales tax (the more you buy, stemming from more earned income, the more taxes you pay), tariff (the more trade there is, more taxation) and income tax (for obvious purposes)

@Borb

No

That’s MY land

we should allow prostitution and put a dollar value on everything on earth, it all must be the route of most efficiency and most profit

MY property

not the states

tell me, bud, who protects your property rights?

^

Not to mention

I’m not for abolishment of state

Isnt it also *your* bread, *your* car, *your* profit which you earn?

You know what night watchman state is?

Obviously, I used to be a Minarchist

doesn't pay for itself

property tax in return for ensuring your property rights is certainly very reasonable, is it not?

Libertarianism also certainly doesn't address the border issue.

it is terrible on that, yes

Especially given the breadth of state power necessary to enforce the border and protect demographics in the modern age.

Brb gonna eat

But Lex, America is a melting pot

Stupid bigot

we are selling off our values and culture for cold efficiency

the market is not God

I'm actually not a big fan of the property tax. It's one of the forms of tax which prevent one from ever truly owning their own house.

Though to be serious, open borders would economically be a large benefit in the long run excluding all forms of government handouts. The issue however is that culture and people trump economic progress imo

economically in theory in a vacuum

not how it happens

@[Lex] Depends on where you are. Most places around here go for $5k in taxes a year. My family and I currently rent and that's....... $10k which is considered cheap

The issue with property tax is that you pay it all at once if I recall

driving up the housing prices, lowering the wages, lowering the social trust

only a psychopath would support open borders for economic reasons

at least leftists support it because they're a bunch of delusional virtue signalling fucktards

+ all the poor labour would deepen the consumption economy problem

Though increased spending and a more diverse market would spur more innovation, would it not?

at what cost

Arguably, it'd hinder automation by reducing economic pressure.

the phone's a bit shinier, the camera's a bit better, maybe it costs a bit less

but that comes with a price far larger than it's worth

Economically speaking, which is?

Lowered wages?

Lower wages is one of them, economically speaking

but to me the economy is far in the periphery relative to something like the social trust and identity of a nation

Velocity of money would increase due to the propensity to consume increasing in the economy.

the GDP MEME

+ the debt-to-gdp falling, their credit rating would improve and they'd be able to borrow more

realpolitik

Back

@FLanon Agreed however I'm being the devil's advocate, arguing from a purely economic standpoint

@Borb Did ya wolf down your food?

No

Small meal

@Borb kys

K thx

You call me degenerate but still use the term kys

🏳️‍🌈

smh

Lol

Though seriously, lemme ask you @Borb

As compared to an AnCap society, why is a night watchman state necessary?

Mhm

Because ancap is retarded

No state would mean anarchy

An equivalence

The NAP is a good concept but shouldn’t be the only law

If the only way to protect yourself is yourself then it really isn’t civilization

The state should only be there to protect citizens

Protect them from a violation of contract, or beyond?

From harm

Would hate speech be considered a harm?

No

So only physical harm?

Yes

would you advocate for the legalization of all drugs, including PCP?

No

That’s harming people

alright so that's at least more reasonable than some

what's the extent in your opinion

and should we have a minimum age for drug use

21

Whatever age of alcohol

If that shifts the drugs shift

Smaller less harmful drugs I don’t care

Do fucking weed just don’t hurt anyone else

When your on pcp you are a monster

But shouldnt I be allowed to do what I want with my own body, so long as I'm not harming others/

You are incapable of controlling yourself

@Vaghar you will be harming others

You become a danger to others on heavy drugs

so should we allow fathers to smoke weed

Sure

But they must fill out forms

Some regulation

Not just anyone above 21

@Borb As a percentage though, most people who do heavy drugs dont harm anyone else

Physically at least

True

But there is that one percentage

Which is pretty large

Should we also ban Christianity?

No

What do you think libertarians are lol

I mean there's that 1% of Christians who attack "heathens"

😂

should be much higher

^

Baste

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/phineas-priesthood

Think I'm joking?

Don’t give me fucking splc

*theyre out there*

Lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Priesthood

*christians bad muslims good* - billary binton

based

Lol

should be much more of those

*keep immigrants deport republicans* - billary baste binton

Though seriously

Why should the actions of 1% affect the remainder 99%?

Religion is a beleif

It’s what you do with the beliefs

You can worship a goat for all I care

Just don’t bomb shit

Well most people who do hard drugs do it in their basement or bedroom away from others

Theyre not like hotboxing parties

then they scavenge around for more

harming people in the process

they are the ones being harmed by the people who brought it in the country

It’s a biological trap

That kills

Couldnt the same be said for marijuana though?

No

I'll be back, gotta finish up some AP work

Ok

Weed may be degenerate

But you know what’s **NOT**

Faith in **JESUS CHRIST**

@Vaghar What class?

AP Euro

@zakattack04

awww :(

I miss that class so much.

Loved it so much, enjoy it while it lasts my friend @Vaghar

I bet I will, I love history. The class I fear the most though is AP Lit

AP Euro was a very fun class

@Borb Back

So why cant the same be said for weed?

Why do you fear AP lit

@Vaghar tl;dr Controlled Substances Act prohibits marijuana

Well yes, of course

Though this is a discussion on marijuana legality, not saying that people should use it

GOP turnout is not low (it's about the same as 2014). It’s Dem turnout that’s high. And that’s what could cost the GOP the House.

Typically in midterms there is a turnout drop off with younger voters and non-college educated voters.

The first dropoff favors the GOP. The latter dropoff didn’t matter...until 2016 (when Trump won them over) and now that could hurt the GOP (because they're now Trump's base).

As these elections have shown, turnout among whites with a college degree is up, and even higher among women in that subgroup.

While the Obama-Trump voter still exists, the issue, again, is that they may not show up this time. But that may not matter for 2020.

Moving from a 2018 to a 2020 electorate may help Trump on balance, even with higher younger turnout (won't be that high anyway).

Obama-Trump voters will be more likely to show up then, so college educated whites won't have as much weight then.

@[Lex]

EMERGENCY

VC

What happened last night?

>I agree with Medicare for All
>I want a Medicaid expansion
https://twitter.com/wiredsources/status/1034801326209814529

I really hope there is a debate set up, this along with wanting to abolish ICE and believing a corporate tax increase is a tax cut, not the sharpest knife in the drawer

@[Lex] GOP turnout is low in the special elections but high in the primaries

😂😂

@FLanon Do you think Gillum could win

I think DeSantis is more likely to win, but I'm not going to Hillary Effect it

Won't Gillum turn out people who don't normally vote in midterm elections

like Black voters

Yeah, he's a fucking idiot who wants to abolish ICE, wants to do medicare for all and a medicaid expansion *at the same time*, is under FBI investidation, and thinks a tax increase is a tax cut for corporations