Message from @FLanon
Discord ID: 484080289451212821
@shrub I'm Good
Just talk about how the Green Party is rising and the Democrats are falling
it'd be hard to coordinate
talk about Turning point/walk away whatever it is
and divide and conquer
I suspect people would see right through that a lot of the time
Talk about how the Democrats are corporate and bought. Talk about how foreign governments pay them and how they accuse their enemies of doing it
Talk about Saul Alinsky and how prominent democrats and democratic dynasties are Alinskyites
Yeah but not sure hard Dems would leave to green on a whim
Greens catch a ton of flack in tighter elections like Ohio, lot of people don't buy into it
He isn't a WN
I'll see if Trump actually does something
Tbh, I think Trump should invite Peter Brimelow into his cabinet
Or maybe Coulter, just to be safe
Based on him saying Probably will reach far beyond the scope of just Google, probably could influence the entirety of social media considering Trump said "Google & others", implying Twitter and maybe also Facebook
@ThatRightWingFish Fuck WN. America shouldn't be for whites only, It should be for Western Europeans only
No
Most white immigrants, besides Northwestern europeans, vote Democrat
No one that has heritage outside of Cornwall should be considered American
It's a legislative proposal but I think Trump can say something similar to this
Got it from Button
@ThatRightWingFish I don't know tbh. He probably falls into the crowd of hating boomers, wanting to end immigration, etc
Inevitably, this will have to go through the Supreme Court
Which I can agree with. But tbh, I think thats only the first step
Their interpretations of "Social Media" are incredibly massive, including WebMD and Amazon.com as "social media". They are also incredibly broad on free speech, and have described social media as the modern public forum unanimously in a previous ruling.
tbh, this guy should have been POTUS
"Even with these assumptions, the statute here enacts a prohibition
unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech it burdens.
Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate
with one another on any subject that might come to mind.
With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many
are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for
employment, **speaking and listening in the modern public square**,
and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and
knowledge. Foreclosing access to social media altogether thus prevents
users from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment
rights. Even convicted criminals—and in some instances especially
convicted criminals—might receive legitimate benefits from
these means for access to the world of ideas, particularly if they seek
to reform and to pursue lawful and rewarding lives. "
-Packingham v. North Carolina
I suspect it would take a while for the court to get to this theoretical EO, but in the end they would rule in our favor
Wow, Trump really is Patton's reincarnation
sounds like fake news
wow
Seems that this is actually credible
It's scarcely being reported though
but it has the appearance of credibility due to the amount of sources restating the claim