+ all the poor labour would deepen the consumption economy problem

Though increased spending and a more diverse market would spur more innovation, would it not?

at what cost

Arguably, it'd hinder automation by reducing economic pressure.

the phone's a bit shinier, the camera's a bit better, maybe it costs a bit less

but that comes with a price far larger than it's worth

Economically speaking, which is?

Lowered wages?

Lower wages is one of them, economically speaking

but to me the economy is far in the periphery relative to something like the social trust and identity of a nation

Velocity of money would increase due to the propensity to consume increasing in the economy.

the GDP MEME

+ the debt-to-gdp falling, their credit rating would improve and they'd be able to borrow more

realpolitik

Back

@FLanon Agreed however I'm being the devil's advocate, arguing from a purely economic standpoint

@Borb Did ya wolf down your food?

No

Small meal

@Borb kys

K thx

You call me degenerate but still use the term kys

🏳️‍🌈

smh

Lol

Though seriously, lemme ask you @Borb

As compared to an AnCap society, why is a night watchman state necessary?

Mhm

Because ancap is retarded

No state would mean anarchy

An equivalence

The NAP is a good concept but shouldn’t be the only law

If the only way to protect yourself is yourself then it really isn’t civilization

The state should only be there to protect citizens

Protect them from a violation of contract, or beyond?

From harm

Would hate speech be considered a harm?

No

So only physical harm?

Yes

would you advocate for the legalization of all drugs, including PCP?