😂

If you wanna find the truth, you have to accept the possibility of being wrong.

@Puzzloo That is true on both sides of an issue. However, I tend to not believe those organizations that have a vested interested in the outcome.

@The Gwench https://namelyliberty.com/dr-andrew-zimmermans-full-affidavit-on-alleged-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-that-u-s-govt-covered-up/

there you go

so much for there not being a link between vaccines and autism

that affidavit exposes the truth

https://youtu.be/-SCw1HqF464

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids Thank you for that. 😃

youre welcome

https://namelyliberty.com/dr-andrew-zimmermans-full-affidavit-on-alleged-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-that-u-s-govt-covered-up/

the government strawmanned an expert witnesses testimony to give you propaganda claiming "theres no link between vaccines and autism" rip vaxxers

@The Gwench if youd like i could also share an hour long Neurology lecture given by a Neurologist explaining the link between vaccines and autism

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids Please share it. 😃

@The Gwench https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYV8laCbNSE

idk why it isnt showing like a video is supposed to

Hang on

Try now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYV8laCbNSE

👏

its excellent

I’m going to watch that. I love bio and science videos. 😃

nice

enjoy

@The Gwench btw i dont recommend simply listening to that lecture, you can learn a lot more if you watch what youre being shown

They were only trying to be helpful

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids

who?

what?

@мιяαgє

👻

i think you might be a bit confused

But I am not a You I am a Me.

You are You and I am Me.

👀

cool story

i dont have time for trolling atm

Are you feeling alright?

🤔

if you continue, youll be blocked

I did not mean to disturb you. I apologize. Why were you upset at videos being posted? You did not have to watch them? I am confused you are right.

Wha

Man, are you okay.

Howdy @Puzzloo

How's it going?

Don't ping me when I'm here.

And I'm doing fine thank you.

oh so you were talking to me?

I'm fine thanks.

k

k

Sooooooo

This is a flat earth server? 😄

the earth is a cat

The earth is a globe

Change my mind

Okay guys

That one really bothers me

You really are against vaccines??!?!

Can I go into VC with someone and listen to their opinion?

Vaccines are gud

Yes

@The Gwench Can you explain why you are against vaccienes?

<:smart:484956754489376781>

<a:fakenews:507983891056033797>

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

<a:poop:507983981187432458>

<:deadpoop:551269056766935040>

@The Gwench what is that role that says Zink what does it mean last time it was lead

<#484538010483032065>

It's just a role for ranking

The first one

O

@Puzzloo Your reaction to being pinged by someone who is only being gracious has to be one of the rudest comments I’ve ever seen. It’s normal to @mention someone when there are multiple people in the room. Talk to me that way and you’re gone. Am I understood?

@Puzzloo Satan has your soul, realise the globe is the occult, we're trying to help you, you're not trying to help us. Thank you

...

**Question Of The Day #20**

Should topics such as 9/11, vaccines, conspiracies, and flat earth be shadow-banned or censored on google and all social media?

Please share your thoughts here in the <#484514023698726912> 😃

@Human Sheeple Good morning. 😃

At least it’s morning where I am. 🤔

How's things?

Question 20: Free speech is a right, when man starts taking your tongue out with a knife he is doing the work of the Devil. Unfortunately google, jewtube, kikebook and shitter all have OWNERS and SHAREHOLDERS. So they have the right to free speech on their private property. So if they don't want to permit you to use their property to speak freely, just don't use their property and make your own forum, website, application etc where you can.

I still think misinformation has to be controlled

But then the question will be

Who determines what is misinformation and what not

The mainstream narratives should be censored.

Cactus people are real

What are even these questions, as if anyone is going to say yes. You're in a conspiracy server asking if conspiracies should be censored.

We're talking about the very likely possibility that the state controlled media is being censored in order to push a narrative that involves killing off you and everybody you know and love.

My free speech has been restrained.

I can't tell people to not ping me when I'm here anymore.

And I was polite too sadly.

@Puzzloo Yes you can. Go ahead. Go ahead, be rude to someone again and see what happens 😁

That's not being rude, that's being honest. I don't like when people ping me for nothing, and I expressed it in a calm and polite manner. Please stop censoring me.

Your honesty was abrupt and rude. Perhaps be more assertive...instead of so aggressive about it.

I didn't know this was a christian minecraft server. I literally said "Don't ping me when I'm here.
And I'm doing fine thank you."

Are you going to tell me I'm in the wrong because I forgot to say "please"? If anything it's not an aggressive tone and more like "Hey you don't need ping me, I'm already here.".

If you're going to advocate free speech and anti-censoring, then don't censor me like that for something so slight. Holy shit.

@Puzzloo lol

The guy literally doesn't owe me anything, if he wanted he could've kept doing it. I simply told him not to because it was pointless.

@Puzzloo that was so long of an explanation. Could have been easier had you just said “please” 😂

Sorry for not abiding to your christian minecraft roblox friendly and fortnite streaming server.

@Puzzloo Thank you for the apology.

Hey, look I'm gonna swear. "Fuck" Holy shit.

@Puzzloo oh my 😂

Listen I understand it might've came as rude, but that's not my intent.

Apologies for doing so, but to say it's the rudest comment you've ever seen is quite a stretch imo.

Also please don't ping me in everywhere of your single messages when I'm there, thank you. There's point in doing so because ping is something you usually use to get someone's attention. But if you already got it, I doubt there's any point to it.

@Puzzloo I have yeast chicken

*Should the UN get involved in a woman’s right to have an abortion?*
That question makes no sense

They shouldn't but at a certain age the fetus is probably alive.

It's not because one makes a mistake that they only allowed to feel the full consequences instead of repairing the damage done.

But at some point, I think it's agreeable that it could be considered a baby. That's why if you're pregnant by accident, abort from the start. (Unless it's too late)

I am a pro life

It said for context that the UN declared abortion to be a human right, then the question asks about getting involved in a human right.
First of all, if you want to consider abortion to be a human right, how would affirming that be "getting involved"?
Getting involved is basically pro-life, by overturning that as a right of choice to a right to live for the fetus.

That is why the previous day question doesn't make complete sense to me

It's not easy to answer.

You can't ask the fetus if it wants to live.

Today's question might seem simple, but it is a bit more complicated, because it is related to internet algorithms.

But if you let it live as an accident, there are chances it will be treated as an accident.

Life isn't about consent

Instead of curing a disease, prevent it.

Mistakes do happen, but if you can prevent you should.

Well

Life is about consent, you can kill yourself at any time. Well most of the time.

I joined to debunk you

You can, doesn't make it moral

Because beliving vaccines are bad is really idiotic

It's idiotic but if they are right it's not.

The thing is

They aren't

It's idiotic if the vaccines aren't fake, but it's smart if it's fake.

🤔

We're dealing with uncertainty here.

No

It's a thing of both sides.

WE DON'T

No man

This is not a thing about opinion

Those are scientific facts

Facts are a subjective opinion that is acknowledge by a massive group of people.

Not true

You can look up what a fact is.

Definetly not true

You are very wrong my friend

You are not good at debates.

Science doesn't work that way

<:mad:507991428924964867>

I disagree with many conspiracies, but you're attacking it wrongly.

"Science doesn't work that way."

@Puzzloo I am, just listening to you first

Science is ever changing.

Look, I am really happy to explain how science works to you

Eh, it sometimes does work that way, but generally not in medical science

But it'll take a while

Psuedo science, sounds good doesnt work

So i first give a short comment asnd listen

I'm listening.

Do you guys want me to explain when something becomes a fact?

Okay good, because I am a very scientific thinking person myself

Sorry for any grammar or spelling errors, I am german not american or anything with english as native language

Good for you, think skeptically

Good

Skeptical thinking is a good thing.

Thats true

But you have to learn when to have faith.

But only if you have toe abilities and resources

But let me explain

Do you know what correlation is?

@Puzzloo Why are you putting faith with science

I'm not talking about religious faith.

Doubt x

“I believe that everything happens for a reason. People change so that you can learn to let go, things go wrong so that you appreciate them when they're right, you believe lies so you eventually learn to trust no one but yourself, and sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.”
-Kim shellfish

@Puzzloo Do you know what correlation is?

When someone tells you "trust me jump into my arms."

You have to have faith when right, and think skeptically when wrong.

Much of science is inductive, facts are decided by a group of people in that respect.

Can we go in some vc its faster to explain

@AstralSentient Not true

@AstralSentient By evidence

But evidence can be falsified.

Anyone in for VC?

I think this would make fun

I am down

My voice just sounds crappy and I have this german accent so please ignoe that

I want to explain scientific work and evidence and this stuff

Never u might have to wait

I'l be using text.

I'M better at expressing myself through text.

They are, these people compile descriptive conclusions to predict various phenomenon, and agree on them not to be epistemological truth but principles that they deem a more accurate descriptor

Yep.

I am on a tablet so I can’t use VC

I mean it's common sense.

It's like saying because x did a that x will always do a.

You there?

Lol?

I'm there.

<:angrycube:507990207602229249>

Vaccines are not perfect but they are genetically modified cells (usually of the disease itself) to be harmless so that the body can train it's immunity against it.

@ZeroT I just finished watching a video that explains the problems with vaccines administered to infants under the age of 2. There is a significant risk of brain damage in that 2 year window. It’s a long video but very good. This information comes from a neuroscientist.

Puzzloo, your information is correct, but neuroscience has discovered that the brain has its own immune system, that should not be messed with while the brain is still developing.

@The Gwench can u prove that video actually have proven facts or information

I suggest you watch that video. Determine for yourself whether the guy is making it up.

Link?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYV8laCbNSE

@The Gwench That may be true but that only underlines that vaccines are so important

Huh? The idea of triggering immunity is a great one. However, in practice, this is not what’s always achieved.

Look

You know what herd immunity is?

Explain it for everyone please.

You need at least 95% of the people immunized

To protect the rest who cannot be vaccinated

Like infants, weak people

So by that I can assume that there is only 5% that cannot be vaccinated.

With the 95% immunized the chances of the other people getting the disease is around 0

@The Gwench Not a really true assumption, there are less then 5% that can't be vaccinated

How do you know this?

Its just a minimum requirement

Demographics

The major part of people who can't be vaccinated are new born infants

Given that allergies are a common issue these days, I refuse to believe that only fewer than 5% cannot be vaccinated.

Those with severe immunoligical deficits are a smaller part

@The Gwench What do allergies have to do with vaccines?

Many vaccines have allergens

To many people

They are not perfect, I can draw a parallel to this: If you use the same 'pest control' tactic against rats, they will eventually adapt to outsmart it. That's why when you reuse the same poison over and over, they may eventually develop an innate immunity. Also sometimes in rare cases, for x reasons vaccines can cause the actual disease. (X stands for any situation with different variables ex: non sterilized syringes, mistakes in genetic compound, etc whatever you could think of that would be possible even if unlikely.)

But, my opinion how that measle managed to infect the vaccined. Is that the measles probably was exposed to the vaccined people because of the host not being vaccined. (Think of it as you being on the other side of the canyon and eventually creating a bridge to the other side. The bridge being mutation in genetics to adapt.

However what I meant earlier is that while it's true vaccines are important if they are real. Is that it's kind of a dilemma I can't explain. I do think this vaccine conspiracy is unlikely and I really am not in the strong forte of believing it. But I have not dissected an actual vaccine myself (It'd require me to have some basis knowledge in that field mind you, and some plan to get my hands on it either) What I meant is that while if vaccines are real, they work. My point is that I wanna stay open to a paradigm shift that they are not.

I am not sure if you understand, my line of thinking is quite unorthodox. I agree with science but I also like to use creativity/logic simultaneously. I disagree with statistics even if they can be useful sometimes, but each situation is different. (May it be by only one atom particle to be different) While reusing the same tactic can work, it will not always work. (That's what I think over what you said about stats earlier)

Gotta seperate in two because discord text limit.

Show me this data, I want to see those allergenes

Otherwise by faith I probably didn't express it right. What I meant is that sometimes lies can happen. When someone tells you that the bible cannot have lies I chuckle (even if it might be true.). There's still the possibility that there might be lies, because remember that it may look good but is it really? If god cannot create a boulder that he himself can't lift. Then would that mean that he is imperfect. Either way the bible could of been a conspiracy itself or blah blah x reason for it to contain such lies.

I also think the same of science, sometimes things can look good even if you don't understand them. But you have to do your research sometimes and be open minded that you might be wrong. (Even if the truth ends up being ugly or hard to accept)

Egg protein is a common ingredient in many vaccines.

I, personally, am averse to having mercury, alluminum, or cloned fetal cells injected into me.

From what vaccines supposedly inject you, the alluminum content is not lethal.

The alluminum content in one vaccine is not lethal, I agree. However, alluminum is accumulative. The body does not get rid of it. Yet it’s now recommended to give 48 vaccines to infants before they are even in school.

There is no chelation in existence that can rid the body of alluminum.

I agree that it may cause a problem where paradoxes occur everywhere, but sometimes charging full front can solve paradoxes. But sometimes not, so you have to think of another way to solve it.

Also, I like to think that science theories or "facts" should still be testable.

Also, are you there because I can't hear you for some reason

@The Gwench Not true

Why the need for alluminum in the first place?

Even accumulative metals

Are getting out

In such small doses

They need it to prepare the viruses

Alluminum is an innate tinfoil hat.

Change my mind.

@ZeroT Please show me your scientific data.

But yeah I agree with a lot of things you say, but the things I disagree I just can't really express correctly my thoughts.

They are abstract and I don't really know the terms or sentences I should use to explain them.

Why the cloned fetal cells? Gross!!!

@The Gwench Dude? What are you talking about

Can you come to VC?